Countries where the leaders moved decisively early on and gave clear messages , did much better. Countries like uk ,usa are a clear example of either you need good leadership, which they don't have , or you have a population that takes personal responsibility like the Japanese/Singaporeons without much need of government handholding.
And you have countries like mine , India with 1.3 b people, where the government moved decisively early on to shutdown everything, controlled the often predicted explosion in cases , but is now facing a quandary as the economy has suffered a lot and have little choice but to open up. Here also states which were serious in implementing the lockdown and testing measures , have come out very well , while states like maharashtra (Mumbai) with inexperienced chief ministers, just went through the motions and are reaping thousands of positive cases per day. Also like usa, the federal structure leads to some states with opposition (not from central bjp government) , being defensive in their approach. Looking for reasons to blame the central government rather than accepting that health and law order is a state subject on which central government has very limited control. China's centralized dictatorial model has a lot of advantages in such situations.
India now is testing 100000 persons per day with 7000 coming out positive and 150 to 200 deaths every day. Our death tally has crossed 4000 yesterday. This death rate has never crossed 200 per day for whatever reasons. People are maintaining distance, while markets are open in most of India. A explosion in cases might occur in the next few weeks with the migrant workers trekking home , with work starting slowly.
India has a gross savings rate of 30 % , with people not depending on the government in times of need.
In the meantime Chinese army decides it's a good time to ingress a few km into disputed JK Ladakh area with 500 odd men. The border security men on indo china border dont carry weapons and physical clashes with rods is common.