Yes youre right, lets wait and see....I Don't think Starstreak can be considered cheap low end stuff. Moreover if you compared with Polish stuff. Still like I said in my previous post. Have to be careful to read the info from Indonesia Media these days. A lot of unconfirmed info moving around, even a respectable media like Tempo can get slip, like their claim of Typhoon deal that I've put forward above.
Agreed. I would very much doubt if compared to IR seeking MANPADS from certain countries, Starstreak could be considered cheap. The Starstreak is a follow on to the Starburst, is also laser guided and has 3 darts fitted with explosives. Buyers have a choice of mounting their Startreaks in 3s on Lightweight Multiple Launchers - like what Malaysia did with its Starbursts.I Don't think Starstreak can be considered cheap low end stuff. Moreover if you compared with Polish stuff.
So far, the official photograph that I've seen, mounted on the Land Rover. That's been talk on mounting them on various different chassis, but no real development that I know of.Ananda, what vehicle has the POPRAD launcher been mounted on?
Yes, and I believe this already being talked from last year, about possibility getting Typhoon Tranche 1 (UK have 57 of them if not mistaken). However, booth UK and Indonesian Min-def already deny this.UK are quitting their first batch of typoons in 2015+, so there might be something to it
Oke, with its range of 7 km its indeed a hightech high velocity but-still-a-short-range air defence system. Even the QW-3 has a further range (8km). And all ADSs used by us are only capable to take down low slow flying objects from a short distance. Giant Bow, QW-3, Kobra, Mistral, RBS-70 (still active?), S-60, Rheinmetal Rh202, 40L70, Strela (on the Parchim I class)...and none of them can shoot down a tactical cruise missile, PGMs or even a simple airliner at 6 km height.Agreed. I would very much doubt if compared to IR seeking MANPADS from certain countries, Starstreak could be considered cheap. The Starstreak is a follow on to the Starburst, is also laser guided and has 3 darts fitted with explosives. Buyers have a choice of mounting their Startreaks in 3s on Lightweight Multiple Launchers - like what Malaysia did with its Starbursts.
The British use the Air Defence Alerting Device [ADAD] for target alerting with their Starstreaks but according to what I was told by someone, ADAD doesn't work well in SEA due to the high humidity levels. The only known export so far is South Africa and if if I'm not mistaken, Starstreak for a while was limited to only NATO countries [I know I read that somewhere years ago]. A combination of Starstreak and IR seeking missiles would be tough for any low level aircraft to evade.
The radar, the battery command post and the Poprad system are all mounted on the Hussar vehicle, whichAnanda, what vehicle has the POPRAD launcher been mounted on?
But thats Bullsh!t ofcourse edited by an underage kid or an idiot.Operators
United Kingdom
* LML - 135 systems
* SP HVM - 150 systems (approx)
South Africa
* LML - 8 systems
Indonesia
* LML - 350 systems
I think I've comment sometime ago, that after withdrawal of SA-2 in the early 70's, TNI did not have area defense SAM capability. Since then with Rapier etc, they're only equipped themselves with Point Defense SAM. Still, Starstreak (if it's true being procured) in my opinion provide better performance for Point Defense SAM than other existing Point Defense system that TNI used today.Oke, with its range of 7 km its indeed a hightech high velocity but-still-a-short-range air defence system. Even the QW-3 has a further range (8km). And all ADSs used by us are only capable to take down low slow flying objects from a short distance. Giant Bow, QW-3, Kobra, Mistral, RBS-70 (still active?), S-60, Rheinmetal Rh202, 40L70, Strela (on the Parchim I class)...and none of them can shoot down a tactical cruise missile, PGMs or even a simple airliner at 6 km height.
For some reason, the Starburst and the follow Starstreak didn't attract much customers, possibly due to the price tag. Malaysia was the 2nd export customer, after Canada, for the Starburst when it ordered 48 for all 3 services. Problem with laser guided missiles is that they are line of sight SACLOS weapons, but are immune to flares, which are carried by almost every fighter.Oke, with its range of 7 km its indeed a hightech high velocity but-still-a-short-range air defence system.
Tue but they were not designed to . There are meant to deal with low flying planes, helicopters and UAVs, anything below 10,000 feet.and none of them can shoot down a tactical cruise missile, PGMs .
A lot depends on how much warning the operators get of an incoming target. A combination of a laser guided Starstreak and an IR guided QW-3 would make it tough for a fighter to deal with. Not sure about others but I read somewhere that Soviet doctrine called for at least 2-3 missiles to be used to increase the kill probability. Do you know if the QW-3 has ben fitted with a Western IFF? The Malaysian army has fitted Thales IFFs on its Chinese supplied FN-6s.Still, Starstreak (if it's true being procured) in my opinion provide better performance for Point Defense SAM than other existing Point Defense system that TNI used today.
So far, officially TNI-AU told the media they are in the process of integrating the National Air Defense network. This integration consists of Early Warning/Radar system, Satellite data transferring, and integrated field data system.Do you know if the QW-3 has ben fitted with a Western IFF? The Malaysian army has fitted Thales IFFs on its Chinese supplied FN-6s.
Some Mig 17 and Mig 15 UTI still in operation until early part of 70's, and L-29 until end of 70's. Besides that according to historical data, they (TNI-AU) operating B-26 and P-51 until they got Sabres (some ex RMAF but most ex RAAF) and T-33 (ex USAF). P-51 and B-26 uses as COIN until being replaced by OV-10. Those B-26 being used as Air Cover for East Timor Invasions. Sabres replaced the Mig 17, whille T-33 replaced the Mig 15 UTI. L-29 later on in the early 80's being replaced by Hawk Mk 53.Ananda,
If I'm not mistaken, due to a break in relations with the Soviet Union, most of the MiGs were not flying by the late 1960's due to a lack of spares. So what fighters was AURI flying before the transfer of 5 ex-RMAF Sabres in 1975? Or were some MiGs still operational well into the early 1970's?
Before that Thales already hook-up with an Indonesian Private Electronic company to collaborate with possible local production on Ground Based Radar.BALTIMORE, Md. -- April 23, 2012 -- Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) executed a Memorandum of Understanding at the Sixth National Radar Seminar in Bali, Indonesia with PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia and the Research Centre For Electronics And Telecommunications of The Indonesian Institute Of Sciences to facilitate collaboration on pending ground-based radar opportunities in Indonesia.
The Northrop Grumman AN/TPS-78 is the latest generation of state-of-the-art radars made possible by advances in high power transistor technology and designed to operate in some of the harshest, most unforgiving environments. Proven in the field, the S-Band long-range AN/TPS-78 is the choice of the U.S. Air Force and customers worldwide.
If I am not mistaken, PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia is PT INTI -http://www.inti.co.id-a state company in telecommunication, while LEN is Lembaga Elektronika Negara with official name PT LEN industri-http://www.len.co.id/- now, a different institution. However, PT LEN Industri itself historically has a very close link with Research Centre For Electronics And Telecommunications of The Indonesian Institute Of Sciences.Northrop Gruman collaborate with Indonesian State Owned Electronic Company (PT. LEN) in producing Ground based Radar system : Northrop Grumman to Collaborate With Indonesian Partner Companies to Produce Ground-Based Radar Systems (NYSE:NOC)
Yes, Thanks. My Mistake. PT. INTI is the one that collaborate with Northrop Grumman and not PT. LEN. PT. LEN seems will collaborate with Thales Raytheon, and PT. CMI with Lockheed Martin. Thus three established Radar manufactures find local partner to Manufactured/Assembly ground based radar locally if they got the project.If I am not mistaken, PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia is PT INTI -http://www.inti.co.id-a state company in telecommunication, while LEN is Lembaga Elektronika Negara with official name PT LEN industri-http://www.len.co.id/- now, a different institution. However, PT LEN Industri itself historically has a very close link with Research Centre For Electronics And Telecommunications of The Indonesian Institute Of Sciences.
This will be the third satellite by Lapan, but First totally build by them. The other two was collaborating effort with Berlin Institute of Technology. It also the first satellite with multiple capabilities build by them. The Satellite will be able to conducts terrain mapping and photograph, and also monitoring ship-lanes and and relaying short band radio transmissions used by amateur radio operators.TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - Deputy Head of Aerospace Technology National Aeronautics and Space Institute (LAPAN) Soewarto Hardhienta said LAPAN will orbit an artificial satellite Indonesia in August.
"It is entirely artificial satellites Indonesia," said Soewanto in the office of the Ministry of Education and Culture, on Monday afternoon, June 4, 2012.
Satellites that will diorbitkan was named LAPAN-A2. He said LAPAN include three main devices in the satellites. The first device is the photographer of the Earth. Later Indonesia could take pictures of Earth from space with satellites
I think you should read the source in the link. They will use Indian Satellite Launch Vehicle. I think LAPAN needs more time and absolutely more money for their RPS project.Any news about what rocket will be use to orbit that satellite?
Or when and where it will be?
What companies take involve to the rocket maker ?