Re: Which Aircraft Should PAF opt for ????
Thank You Oqaab and Umair although I am still a bit sceptical about the EF particularly considering the supply of spare parts. Lets not forget that even though it is a multinational European venture it was these very same countries that imposed sanctions upon us towing Washingtons line. But if a deal can be struck to guarantee the supply of spare parts than the EF is definately the one to go for rather than the Rafale.
Another thing, already covered in detail by Gf, is that without integration with force multipliers or smart SOWs, we'll be paying an extortionate amount of money for an aircraft that cannot offer anything significant over the Mirage Rose due to the absence of support assests. In order to realise the full potential of a high tech fighter like the EF/Rafale you cannot just pay for the aircraft but you have to pay for an entire network to support the aircraft. Which makes me even more sceptical of the EF/Rafale proposal materialising because to date I havent seen any concrete steps taken by the PAF to acquire/upgrade AEW+C, EW, C4I, inflight refueling, ELINT/SIGINT/Battlefield Surveillance or looking at the bigger picture increasing interoperability between the tri services (a problem that all 3 services are responsible for an not just the PAF) etc.
Umair in accordance to the silver bullet strategy designed by the late ACM Mushaf did your sources indicate how many EFs/Rafale the PAF is/will be negotiating for?