The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread

KipPotapych

Well-Known Member
British MoD is claiming Ukrainians are sending “elite units” to Bakhmut. I wouldn’t necessarily trust their “intel” as their claims weren’t necessarily “honest” from the very beginning.

Also, it may be assumed that the two bridges were destroyed by the Russians in order to cut the supply routes. Just going by the British MoD statement.

 

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
British MoD is claiming Ukrainians are sending “elite units” to Bakhmut. I wouldn’t necessarily trust their “intel” as their claims weren’t necessarily “honest” from the very beginning.
The UKMOD is a valuable and reliable source. Of course they aren't going to publicise everything.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
The UKMOD is a valuable and reliable source. Of course they aren't going to publicise everything.
Here's the question though. If Ukraine intends to convince Russia that they're committing their best to the fight around Artemovsk/Bakhmut, would the UKMoD participate in this deception? Or would they blow their cover? I suspect in the former. In which case they are not reliable source. Their goal can't be to tell the public the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. No national MoD can afford to do that, especially in a time of war. So questioning their statements regarding this specific instance is valid.
 

vikingatespam

Well-Known Member
Here's the question though. If Ukraine intends to convince Russia that they're committing their best to the fight around Artemovsk/Bakhmut, would the UKMoD participate in this deception? Or would they blow their cover? I suspect in the former. In which case they are not reliable source. Their goal can't be to tell the public the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. No national MoD can afford to do that, especially in a time of war. So questioning their statements regarding this specific instance is valid.
A better questions is - why is UKR fighting so hard under disadvantageous conditions ? Unless there is something the UKR are working towards, being surrounded on 3 sides isnt ideal.
 

tonnyc

Well-Known Member
A better questions is - why is UKR fighting so hard under disadvantageous conditions ? Unless there is something the UKR are working towards, being surrounded on 3 sides isnt ideal.
Wait, I thought Ukrainian forces are doing a gradual withdrawal this past week? My impression is that as long as Russia is throwing men at their fortified positions, Ukraine is happy to take them on. But as Russia threatens their supply line, Ukraine has been removing some of their troops from Bakhmut while the remainder is fighting a holding action.
 

seaspear

Well-Known Member
It might be that Bakhmut offers some topographical advantage over surrounding areas in it heights as an advantage for artillery and Ukraine would have to withdraw further to positions away from this advantage ,also Ukraine is likely having to withdraw its forces through very heavy mud that could easily trap vehicles or equipment delaying this
 

KipPotapych

Well-Known Member
It might be that Bakhmut offers some topographical advantage over surrounding areas in it heights as an advantage for artillery and Ukraine would have to withdraw further to positions away from this advantage ,also Ukraine is likely having to withdraw its forces through very heavy mud that could easily trap vehicles or equipment delaying this
Topography doesn’t work (Bakhmut circled in blue on the first image):





They need the rails connecting to Krasna Gora though (the dark grey line on both images going through Bakhmut).
 

KipPotapych

Well-Known Member
The AP claiming that the Ukrainians took out the bridges citing the same reports. Weird how that works: Civilians flee embattled town as Ukrainian pullout looms

Ukrainian units over the past 36 hours destroyed two key bridges just outside Bakhmut, including one linking it to the nearby town of Chasiv Yar along the last remaining Ukrainian resupply route, according to U.K. military intelligence officials and other Western analysts.
 

vikingatespam

Well-Known Member
Wait, I thought Ukrainian forces are doing a gradual withdrawal this past week? My impression is that as long as Russia is throwing men at their fortified positions, Ukraine is happy to take them on. But as Russia threatens their supply line, Ukraine has been removing some of their troops from Bakhmut while the remainder is fighting a holding action.
I thought they were leaving too, on account of the bridge destruction. Now, who can tell ?
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
I thought they were leaving too, on account of the bridge destruction. Now, who can tell ?
I've seen several videos in the past couple of days of Ukrainian infantry walking out of the town. It's possible that they are withdrawing after all.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Update Jan. 30th-31st

Zaporozhye-Dnepropetrovsk.

Russian T-80BVs in Zaporozhye area. Allegedly they're from the 3rd Army Corps.


Oskol Front.

Ukrainian infantry near Krasniy Liman getting hit in the forest.


Ukrainian T-64BV getting hit by artillery near Svatovo.


Russian Shturm-S taking out allegedly a Ukrainian APC, near Svatovo.


Russian 2S5s near Svatovo.


Russian BMP-2s in the Svatovo-Kremennaya area.


LDNR Front.

LNR forces artillery and mortar fires towards Seversk. With the impeding fall of Artemovsk/Bakhmut, this might become the next town to be attacked.


Wagner artillery fires at a Ukrainian position near rail station Salt. With hindsight, we know the station was taken shortly thereafter. Surprisingly the building was intact.


Ukrainian PzH-2000 operating near Artemovsk/Bakhmut.


Some footage of Wagner forces in Klescheevka. Note, they're riding a BTR-MDM, likely loaned from a nearby VDV element, confirming that they're engaged in the area.


DNR 58th SpN btln (former 3rd SpN btln) ATGM launch against something firing in the distance, allegedly a Ukrainian BMP-2. Avdeevka.


Russian infantry engaged somewhere near Avdeevka.


Russian loitering munition strike on a Ukrainian M-777 near Bogoyavlenka, Ugledar area.


Russian Ka-52 strikes near Ugledar.


Russian 40th Marines near Ugledar.


DNR rescue workers and soldiers are getting first aid training.


Reconstruction efforts have begun in Severodonetsk-Lisichansk. One resident shows off the shoddily installed replacement windows. It does help make the place warmer, but is obviously not a permanent solution. Unlike Mariupol', where reconstruction efforts are being showed off, and have political significance, here not much is being done.


Russia.

Ukrainian strikes hit Shebekino and Belgorod. Russian air defenses intercepted some inbounds.


Misc.

A Ukrainian Bayraktar-mini downed.


A damaged Ukrainian Kipri MRAP.


Russian Grad, Uragan, and 2S4 operations.


Russian Su-35S operations in the war. They're carrying the R-73, R-77, R-37M, and Kh-31P.


Russian T-72Bs, B3's, and B3mod'16s.


Russian soldiers with a captured Barrett M107A1 at a training ground.


Russian Volga armored train operations, Ukraine. Note the helo cover.


Russian troops training on BRM-1KMs somewhere in the war zone.


Ukrainian mobilization efforts continue.


The World.

Ukrainian soldiers training in the UK.


Reportedly France is delivering 12 more Caesars to Ukraine.


France is also reportedly handing over Ground Master 200 radars.

 

Capt. Ironpants

Active Member
British MoD is claiming Ukrainians are sending “elite units” to Bakhmut. I wouldn’t necessarily trust their “intel” as their claims weren’t necessarily “honest” from the very beginning.

Also, it may be assumed that the two bridges were destroyed by the Russians in order to cut the supply routes. Just going by the British MoD statement.

UKMod also reporting Russians are fighting with shovels:


The Independent reported the Ukrainians blew up the bridges, same as AP, citing "videos shared widely on social media [which] appeared to show Ukrainian troops setting off explosives on a metal railway bridge in the city, with images showing similar destruction of several road bridges." At least this piece includes a map showing locations of the bridges in question:


At least two bridges were blown according to various reports. I have also seen reports claiming it was the Russians who blew them. So many conflicting claims are coming out about Bakhmut. That's how it goes in war.
 

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Here's the question though. If Ukraine intends to convince Russia that they're committing their best to the fight around Artemovsk/Bakhmut, would the UKMoD participate in this deception? Or would they blow their cover? I suspect in the former. In which case they are not reliable source. Their goal can't be to tell the public the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. No national MoD can afford to do that, especially in a time of war. So questioning their statements regarding this specific instance is valid.
It's not in the Ukrainian interest for 3rd party Ukrainian partner MODs to publicise Ukrainian military plans because it gives succour to the enemy attacking Ukraine. It also depends upon how much of their plans the Ukrainians have shared with the UK, US etc. Finally, as you note, OPSEC is important.
 

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Topography doesn’t work (Bakhmut circled in blue on the first image):

They need the rails connecting to Krasna Gora though (the dark grey line on both images going through Bakhmut).
I am sure that the Russians are quite capable of trucking ammo to artillery on the high ground. Whilst the bulk of their logistics are rail dependent, they don't need rail to extend right to the frontlines like it did during WW1. Hence the topography would work for them. It is dangerous to underestimate the Russians because they are relearning the basics and learning new lessons. Their biggest problem is their C2 system.
UKMod also reporting Russians are fighting with shovels:
A sharpened entrenching tool is a very good hand to hand combat weapon. It's a large long handled slashing blade and very effective. The sharper the better.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Footage of Ukrainian forces withdrawing from Artemovsk/Bakhmut. Note the BMP-1 column getting wrecked was the Ukrainian withdrawal from Yagodnoe. We have 4 BMP-1s knocked out, a M113 damaged, a Panthera T6, a damaged BTR-4E, and a bunch of unarmored cars that were likely being used by Ukrainian forces, which is typical. We also have infantry exiting on foot in small groups.


Ukrainian CASEVAC, also allegedly part of the retreat from Artemovsk/Bakhmut.


A Russian journalist claims Russian forces hold ~40% of Artemovsk/Bakhmut, and Ukrainian forces were exiting the city in small columns of 5-7 vehicles towards Konstantinovka.


A withdrawal is definitely taking place in some form, but it might just be them pulling back to the western half of the town, along the river line. They did this in Severodonetsk-Lisichansk.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Footage of Ukrainian forces withdrawing from Artemovsk/Bakhmut. Note the BMP-1 column getting wrecked was the Ukrainian withdrawal from Yagodnoe. We have 4 BMP-1s knocked out, a M113 damaged, a Panthera T6, a damaged BTR-4E, and a bunch of unarmored cars that were likely being used by Ukrainian forces, which is typical. We also have infantry exiting on foot in small groups.


Ukrainian CASEVAC, also allegedly part of the retreat from Artemovsk/Bakhmut.


A Russian journalist claims Russian forces hold ~40% of Artemovsk/Bakhmut, and Ukrainian forces were exiting the city in small columns of 5-7 vehicles towards Konstantinovka.


A withdrawal is definitely taking place in some form, but it might just be them pulling back to the western half of the town, along the river line. They did this in Severodonetsk-Lisichansk.
It looks like that's exactly what's happening. Wagner fighters have rapidly advanced through the eastern part of town, reaching the T-34 monument near the river. Note, the area is safe enough for them to walk openly and plant flags.


More footage of the withdrawal. With operational encirclement now a reality (all roads are under fire) Ukraine is losing forces as evidenced by what appears to be a smashed groups of cars being used by Ukrainian forces.


Ukrainian vehicles somewhere near Artemovsk/Bakhmut. With main roads not available, unpaved roads are being used and due to the weather are in bad shape.


On the other hand, here's a column of Pathera T6 armored cars heading to Artemovsk/Bakhmut. Considering they are primarily being used by two newly formed brigades (47th and 88th), it's possible that Ukraine is in fact committing some of their best newly trained forces to this fight. One of these vehicles has already been captured in Stupki, and another was seen in the town itself so it's possible either elements of these two units were already present, or another unit received some quantity (possibly a very small quantity) of these vehicles.


I think one thing is now clear. Without a significant counter-attack to reopen major roads into the town, the situation will be untenable. If all supplies, CASEVAC, reinforcements, and rotations, have to be done in these conditions, Ukraine will lose men and materiel simply entering and leaving the town.

The latest map from Rybar shows continued fighting right next to the road out of Khromovo, and some Russian gains inside the town as well as Ukrainian counter-attack attempts. He also mentions Ukrainian helos and dive bombers being used, as well as reinforcements from the newly formed brigades being sent in. If this last bit is true, this is much to Russia's benefit, as every Ukrainian unit committed to this fight will be less available for the upcoming Ukrainian offensive.

 

vikingatespam

Well-Known Member
If the UKR have some sort of plan that requires holding onto Bahkmut no matter what then thats great, but getting men killed because they waited too long will not help morale.

I have vague hopes the UKR are about to drop a big hammer somewhere, but thats a lot of hopium.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
If the UKR have some sort of plan that requires holding onto Bahkmut no matter what then thats great, but getting men killed because they waited too long will not help morale.

I have vague hopes the UKR are about to drop a big hammer somewhere, but thats a lot of hopium.
It's practically 100% that they're about to drop a big hammer somewhere. A likely location is Zaporozhye area towards either Melitopol' or Berdyansk though there are other options. However it's not clear that hammer is ready to drop now. "About to" is a fungible term, and it will likely come once the ground is a little drier. Ukraine has reportedly trained up 3 new army corps.
 

seaspear

Well-Known Member
Does Russia have the capacity to launch its own "Spring offensive " ? I understand that Russia recently has used many of the recent reservists in wide ranging attacks but how much of this was a full committal it should nominally have significant advantages in military equipment despite earlier losses
 

vikingatespam

Well-Known Member
It's practically 100% that they're about to drop a big hammer somewhere. A likely location is Zaporozhye area towards either Melitopol' or Berdyansk though there are other options. However it's not clear that hammer is ready to drop now. "About to" is a fungible term, and it will likely come once the ground is a little drier. Ukraine has reportedly trained up 3 new army corps.
Berdyansk is the logical place with a large payoff. So logical, that the RU know it and have fortified accordingly. I wonder if the UKR are capable of a set-piece fortified line penetration without taking ghastly casualties.
 
Top