- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #6,901
It's a very interesting discussion and I have a few comments, observations and questions.An interesting analysis on Wagner tactics, and Battalion level reorganization by the Russian army a reserve Ukrainian military officer. He goes into some detail on unit structure and tactics.
First off, it's almost certain that this is the VDV. D-30s, BMD-2s or BMP-2s, 2S9s, ZU-23-2s, all scream VDV. Ok I know the ZU-23-2s are not exclusive, neither are the 2S9s as some Marine Bdes use the latter, and the former are scattered through many units though are less common. But the VDV are their most common operator. In the VDV every unit continues to use the ZU-23-2 for AAA roles. Note, some VDV near Kremennaya have received BMP-2Ms to replace/supplement their BMD-2s. Given battlefield losses, and the nature of the fighting this is a logical choice. Notably absent are SP howitzers, any heavy artillery (no 152mm at all), and any APCs. Also interesting is the very small size of the formation. VDV were always a lighter smaller force so this is also consistent. By the way, normally motor-rifles have one MBT company supporting one infantry btln. Here we have a tank platoon, because VDV divisions only have a tank btln not a tank rgt.
Second off I immediately have questions about vehicle numbers. There is no way a company is riding only 4 IFVs. Presumably these aren't so much all the company vehicles, but rather a detachment of them being used for the assault. They also say that the btln weapons don't include company weapons, but I don't think this is entirely true. It's not likely that the btln has one tank platoon supporting it, and the company has a separate tank just for themselves. It also wouldn't make any sense for the btln to have a 6 gun battery, but then a separate set of guns for each company. It's far likelier some guns are given to each company commander to be used at his discretion, while the rest are kept at the btln command level. Namely one arty pltn of 3 is parcelled out to the assault coys, while the other is kept whole. At least this is what makes sense to me. One BREM-L is interesting and is likely wishful thinking. BREM-Ls are relatively rare. It's possible to replace it with older BMP-based ARV variants. Not sure what the VDV specifically uses, I don't believe there is a BMD-chassis ARV, and it leaves open the question of what would be used to evacuate one of those MBTs if they get knocked out. For 2S9 batteries, I do believe each VDV btln has a 6-gun battery of them, so they should be available. Obviously losses were taken, but I suspect there are enough in storage to replace them. So I think the company slide has a mix of btln level support assets and their own organic vehicles/equipment.
Third off, their platoons are listed as 12 and 11 soldiers respectively. This is far smaller then even typical VDV. The whole thing is rather strange because in a way these numbers make sense with the numbers of IFVs. 12 dismounts are reasonable for 2 IFVs to carry, and their scheme, despite showing 3 platoons per company in the org chart, it seems to imply 2 platoons of 2 vehicles each. This entire thing looks very strange because if the totals are right, then for ~24 infantry dismounts, there are 2 HMGs, 2 ATGMs, 2 mortars, 2 AGS-17s, and a howitzer for support. Of course the current war is heavily about artillery and heavy weapons, but these are very small assault elements. Either the chart is wrong and self-contradictory, or we're looking at companies that have 4 IFVs (presumably 3 crew each), 2 "platoons" of 12 each, and then 22 personnel manning heavy weapons and sniper rifles. Company size, not counting company command elements, would then be a 58 service members, most of them not actually able to participate in the assault directly.
I guess this would kind of make sense if we're talking about assaulting single buildings, or small hamlets at a time, follow by extremely heavy longer ranged fires intended to prevent enemy counter-attacks. But it doesn't make any kind of organization sense within the current VDV structure, and I suspect these formations are composites made out of existing line units rather then standard force organizational charts. Forming a infantry btln where there are 2 sniper pairs per coy, and 2 sniper pairs in the btln, would mean that for less then 200 total infantry you have 16 snipers? I.e. ~9% of the total fighting force are snipers? Ditto for crew served weapons.
EDIT: He talks about a lack of MLRS, but this would make total sense if we're talking VDV. They don't have MLRS.
Last edited: