I've been putting this KFX fiasco on my several post, and agree this renegotiation move is just simply a 'rediculous'.
Rediculous, cause what they are trying to renegotiate is simply the term that we have during CN-235 with Casa back in the 80's.
However with CN-235 we are 50:50 partnership. We are not junior partner.
In KFX, we are only 20%, but we asked more work share from KAI that exceed 20% of our share. We also asked proprietor rights to build and market our own version without Korea or KAI intervention.
Well you can do that if you put more money. Simply on that. This negotiating tactics with negotiating some reduce payment scheme, but in same time ask for more work share and rights...what the heck ?
Well no wonder some in Korean side begin serious doubt of our continous intentions with KFX/IFX program.
But then, the opposition on KFX, is not simply from politics of this administration or some 'hiden' agenda of some factions to get more 'procurement' projects..
But also seems coming from local Industries it self (DI)..with from rumours that I heard also think doing KFX project is not really worthwhile. Some in the local aviation industry feel if we only got 'Junior Partnership' then it's better goes with licensed agreement with more established partner (like Airbus or SAAB).
So, will see how this developed. But on this stage I'm not really hold high expectations on Indonesia continuation on the program. Too many 'interest' that can sidelined the implementation from our side.
Seems Korea it self sees more potential on Naval cooperation with Submarine program or even Corvettes/Frigate. Especially when (if I heard right from the industries sources), MinDef and PAL not really happy with Damen.
Add:
In my opinion, if DI want to continue working with KAI, then forget KFX/IFX. Used the money to work with KAI to further improve FA-50. DI, has no experience with Jet Fighter. The whole portfolio of DI are Transport Turboprop and helicopter.
In 90's I remember plan by then IPTN under Habibie to licensed Hawk 200. Even Habibie then that usually have 'grandious' plan for IPTN, he knows that you can't jump to first line fighters like F-16. Start with something more manageable.
FA-50 is like Hawk 200, something manageable with good potential for Indonesian environment. Like Hawk 200, further developing FA-50 can be add with radar that can provide you with BVR capabilities (Hawk 200 is using derivative of AN66 of F-16, thus can theoretically according to BAe equipped with AIM7).
Most importantly TNI-AU can operate that with quantity that they want, and manageable with their operating budget.
KFX even tough theoritically only available on 2030+ (which in that time it's hope Indonesian budget has much increased than now)..still will be more expensive to operate relative even to F-16V. My guess will be relative in current operating cost of Flankers.
Even with larger budget (and remember you have to calculate inflation cost), I still suspect TNI-AU will have strained their budget on operating 3-5 SQ of KFX. Simply single engine is much cheaper to operate than double engines.
Buy that single seat F-50 design that KAI left, for KFX project. It's win win in my opinion with KAI. They still got money with us left KFX, and we got the more or less relative matured design that they already prepared but left for KFX
Just my two cents