Used for a broad range of missions, including personnel and cargo transport, as well as humanitarian efforts, the Flight2™ avionics modification will replace the C-130H’s analog instruments with seven multifunction displays, three control display units and new digital autopilot. In addition, the aircraft will be equipped with the required Navigation Performance/Area Navigation flight management system, with high altitude release point and computed air release point precision airdrop software. The modernization will help the Indonesian Air Force optimize its operations, improve pilot situational awareness and minimize aircraft downtime.
Asside the structures, personally I also wondering how extensive the original wiring still exists. Considering the quote that I take from Collins Aerospace press release, seems the upgrade avionics content practically complete change from analog to digital system.how many original parts will be left in those C-130s after the centre wing box replacement.
They could fit the RR upgrade kit for the engines and 6 or 8 bladed props. Something that USAF has done.Good points.
I also can't help wondering about the engines & props. Put all those things together & there doesn't seem to be much left, does there?
E-7 is 'dream' by TNI-AU, but with set budget of USD 800 mio for initial batch of 2, E-7 yes will be outside the range. Unless somehow Boeing manage to give discount packages or MinDef being convinces to change for only one in this first batch.E-7 is already too expensive given the budget allocation, so the most likely candidate is SAAB platform. But I wonder why other candidate like E-2 is not being cosidered?
I'm sorry, I'm ignorant for matters of international trade, but why do we must balance our trade with the US? Is there a benefit?However those more 'pro' US also point out that Indonesia trade balance with US is quite disproportionate favoring Indonesia. Thus there's need to rebalance the trade deficit (something that I already point out few years back in this thread).
Well no wories, in fact this is kind of question that we in the financial market often got from our customers. Especially those business whom begin to enter International trade market. Simple answer that we give usually is: "do we (as one economy) still see that particular market important to us?"I'm ignorant for matters of international trade, but why do we must balance our trade with the US? Is there a benefit?
That's what I think. Much cheaper both to buy & operate, & fit into existing logistics. F-16V would be a great advance on what Indonesia has & is available new or as an upgrade.... Doesn't mean F-15EX deal will be postponement definitely, but seems there's talk on going back to original TNI-AU favour base on their proposal in 2020. That's what I personally hope for. F-16 whether 2nd hand with upgrade packages or direct new ones are much more efficient for TNI-AU operational budget and support infrastructure realities.
SAAB's ability to fit the Erieye on multiple platforms is impressive. It was tested on a Fairchild Metro. probably because the Swedish air force had a few & could spare one. It's since been fitted to the SAAB 340, SAAB 2000 (available pretty cheap because SAAB has some used ones stored), Embraer EMB-145/R-99 & Bombardier Global 6000, apparently with no problems.E-7 is 'dream' by TNI-AU, but with set budget of USD 800 mio for initial batch of 2, E-7 yes will be outside the range. Unless somehow Boeing manage to give discount packages or MinDef being convinces to change for only one in this first batch.
However I do agree more and more Erieye will be the preference. One thing that Erieye got attention is the flexibility of the systems to be mounted on customers platform of choices. Even though SAAB initial offer with their own SAAB 2000 regional turboprop platform for Indonesian packages.
PICTURE: Saab unveils C-295 Erieye concept
Saab has unveiled a scale model of EADS Casa's C-295 tactical transport equipped with its Erieye airborne early warning and control radar ...www.flightglobal.com
View attachment 50107
Still SAAB seems try to shown their products can be flexible to be used on customer platform of choices. Their concept of Erieye in C295, I do believe come due to their realisation that C295 is popular platform. Indonesia with strong Airbus long term lobby, will going to be interested on this concept (I suspect even CN 235 can be candidates platform).
So far SAAB try to offer to Indonesia either their own SAAB 2000 platform or Embrear 145 small regional/business jet) as the platform of choices. However seems SAAB willing to try adjust on more platforms to increase their attractiveness. So let's see what platform SAAB offer to Indonesia going to end up. Seems now they are the leading candidate.
Add:
Platform seems matter. E2D being evaluate before, but from 'rumours' Mindef like the system but not the platform. Northrop Grumman will not going to provide other platform options, for few orders from Indonesia sake. The flexibilities on platform choices seems that been SAAB marketing arsenal.
There's talk/rumours that F-15EX is basically 'pride/ego' demand to US administration. Since they don't want to give F-35 yet, then they should give second best thing which is F-15EX. This is to shown US willing to give best assets to Indonesia to compensate Indonesia dropping Su-35.F-16V would be a great advance on what Indonesia has & is available new or as an upgrade.
Platform wise personally I prefer EMB-145 more on operational support available in the market. Still I do heard rumours that Indonesian MinDef like E-2D (base on their studies with Singapore on older gen E-2) and Japan (on current E-2D). However they want longer range platform, which if they insist on that, Northrop Grumman will charge much more premium in price for costs in customisation of the platform choices.The EMB-145 & SAAB 2000 are significantly bigger & can carry more equipment & the Global 6000 has double their max T/O weight.
Good question, would be interesting to hear the reasoning.What exactly is the use case for the police in keeping a 737 airliner? I can see helicopters for SAR/counter-terror/airborne surveiller, but a 737-sized transport? Seems like not a good way to spend resources.