Ya mate that is the confusion here, what international technology, British American or Russians, if he was comparing Arjun to a T-90 then the problem is that such a comparison can not work they are both leagues apart that utilize different methods, The initial T-90s had their share of problems, i think he was comparing the Arjun with American and British tanks and his comments signify what might be a change in the soviet doctrine of warfare in which case well thats good about bloody time.
The real reason for the above stated comment by the Chief of Army staff is to stop the government form pushing the tank down the ranks, i mean the army has made its mind about a armor that is mostly T-90 and T-72(upgraded), and the army is fighting tooth and nail to protect this,
Remember the tank trials that were canceled by the Army, i mean that would have shut the MoD once and for all, however the problem was had Arjun compared up with T-72 and T-90 even bettered them in some aspects and that would have caused a problem for the army.
Its really not all that complicated.
As for the decision, its for the Army to decide after all they have to use it.
And i might add the Arjun tank project has seen its fair share of chief of army staff come and go so i do not know whose opinion will prevail, Army chief or posters here or MoD there.
nfloorl:
see this :-http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20070025577&ch=9/9/2007+9:17:00+PM
Arjun tank's comparative trials called off
Ajai Shukla
Sunday, September 9, 2007 (New Delhi)
For three decades, India's Arjun tank project has struggled and has been scoffed at by experts and dismissed by the army.
The army, in fact, refused to accept the tank into service until comparative trials were held pitting the Arjun against the army's Russian T-72 and T-90 tanks.
But now, mysteriously the army has asked the Ministry of Defence to call off the comparative trials.
The T-72 has proved itself over years, says the army, and the T-90 is even better - only the Arjun needs to prove itself.
Meanwhile, the army is going ahead with buying 347 more T-90s paying a billion dollars to Russia. The army chief will be visiting Russia next week and the defence minister will follow next month.
The MoD itself had insisted on comparative trials before this turnaround. Now it says that you can't compare a 46-tonne T-90 with a 60-tonne Arjun.
But the men who built the tank in the Central Vehicles R&D Establishment in Chennai believe that's just an excuse to avoid comparative trials which would prove that Arjun is the best tank.
''People have been asking that question, how can you compare a 40 tonne class tank with a 60 tonne class tank, and I think the golden question is that irrespective of the weight and other features, if one is given a choice as to which tank he'd like to ride to battle, which tank would you choose?'' said Major General HM Singh, Additional DG, CVRDE.
This competitiveness is a sign of the Arjun's new confidence. After three decades of public criticism, the Arjun seems to have ironed out its defects.
''Over a period of five years, we have evaluated this tank in the deserts of Rajasthan. We have evaluated over 70,000 km of cumulative run with 15 tanks we have fired over 10,000 rounds,'' said R Jayakumar, Associate Director, CVRDE.
But success came only in 2005 after the Arjun hardened its electronics to work in the desert heat and fixed chronic suspension leakages.
The army then demanded that the tank be able to drive for 20 minutes under six feet of water, and that's been done too.
Now as the Arjun races over these rumble strips, it has logged up notable successes.
In the year 2000, the Indian Kanchan Armour proved itself in trials - a T-72 couldn't penetrate the Arjun even from point blank range.
Last June firing trials noted that the ''accuracy and consistency of the Arjun tank was proved beyond doubt.''
While the T-90 plans to install an air conditioner to keep its electronics working, the Arjun's electronics now work at up to 60 degrees.
The MoD admitted this year to the Parliament's Committee on Defence that the ''Arjun's firing accuracy is far superior to other two tanks.''
And that that ''MBT Arjun is specifically configured for Indian Army requirements, and the T-90 does not have some of the advanced features of MBT Arjun.''
But the Arjun's makers don't just want acceptance and a token order of 124 tanks.
They want the Arjun to be the backbone of India's 3500 tank fleet, and the comparative trials, they say, will prove the Arjun deserves that.
The MoD is backpedaling. It says the army could accept another 124 tanks of the improved Arjun and perhaps many more, if the army likes the tank.
''We have kept the option of producing another 124 of the better version of the Arjun tank. And when the army uses this tank, God knows, they may just fall in love with it and decide that the entire production line should be Arjuns only,'' said KP Singh, Secretary Defence Production.
The Army's opposition to the Arjun tank is partly the fault of the Arjun team. It took three decades to develop the tank and the generals lost faith in the project.
And today, with the Arjun ready to prove its worth the army seems unwilling to listen.
