There are about 1.7 million people of voting age in Crimea, about 1.1 million of them are Russian, they go but you're still going to have a very large pro Russia block in Ukraine, basically all the Eastern provinces and the strong pro Russian block in the South centered around Ukraines remaining Black Sea cities, Odessa and Nikolayev. I wouldn't be surprised if they also agitate and split away from Ukraine, especially Odessa and Nikolayev.If that was the case, wouldn't losing the Russian votes in the Crimea ensure that the Ukraine won't vote to align with Russia? this has already been brought up in this thread, I think.
Art
i have a relative in the Just Russia party [regional leadership role] he scoffs at Crimea only... his line is Putin wants all of Ukraine and Crimea is but the start of an avalanche/snowballWhich ever way you look at it Ukraine is screwed, if they don't let the Russian bits go they'll have a very hostile large minority within the country and if they do let them go they take pretty much all of Ukraines industrial capacity with them.
They're not just the Black Sea cities. Kharkov, Donetsk, Zaporozhye, and Lugansk are all inland, but still heavily Russian. Lugansk, Donetsk, and Kharkov especially. It will probably matter a lot what happens in Kharkov and Donetsk next. If they manage to organize and take over the local government the way they did in Crimea, it could mean the end of Ukraine in its current form. If they don't, it's likely that the whole thing will fizzle out.There are about 1.7 million people of voting age in Crimea, about 1.1 million of them are Russian, they go but you're still going to have a very large pro Russia block in Ukraine, basically all the Eastern provinces and the strong pro Russian block in the South centered around Ukraines remaining Black Sea cities, Odessa and Nikolayev. I wouldn't be surprised if they also agitate and split away from Ukraine, especially Odessa and Nikolayev.
Which ever way you look at it Ukraine is screwed, if they don't let the Russian bits go they'll have a very hostile large minority within the country and if they do let them go they take pretty much all of Ukraines industrial capacity with them.
“Judging by its identification number, UAV MQ-5B belonged to the 66th American Reconnaissance Brigade, based in Bavaria,” the statement claimed.....Russia says intercepted US drone over Crimea: arms group
I have my doubts about this News..
But anyway, where would NATO or US have the nearest based Drones from Crimea?
It was a MQ-5B out of the 66th American Reconnaissance Brigade, based in Bavaria according to Yahoo.I have my doubts about this News..
But anyway, where would NATO or US have the nearest based Drones from Crimea?
Well first off there isnt an occupation... see CNN belowI do not know politics nearly as well as some of you do or foreign military's.
But what are the chances US/NATO does get involved in all this?
And I been researching news story after news story but cant find the answer, what is Russia's mission for the Ukraine occupation?
Also, I have recently been suggested to read up on Stepan Bandera. Learning about this figure and organizations he lead, Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), which have relation to current events and rhetoric, may help understand it all better.This is an article which sheds a bit of light on what happened regarding the Ukraine around the time of the Russian revolution and civil war A Ukrainian in Paris: Symon Petliura, Nationalisms, and the Russian Civil War « makinghistoryatmacquarie If the Crimea has been part of Russia for two centuries. I don't normally cite wikipedia but this link gives a readable history of the Crimea. History of Crimea - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Of note that according to this Russian claims through occupation only go back to 1783 after Russia conquered it from the Ottoman empire.
If fighting breaks down between Nato/US and Russia, then who knows. US/Nato is stronger in conventional war, but both have nuclear weapons.I do not know politics nearly as well as some of you do or foreign military's.
But what are the chances US/NATO does get involved in all this?
And I been researching news story after news story but cant find the answer, what is Russia's mission for the Ukraine occupation?
If US/Nato get involved it won't be a conventional warfare because Russia as bad it look is rebuilding its Army and will give US/NATO hell Russia will lose but US/NATO will pay a price that will hurt economics around the world. The cost of conventional war with Russia will be huge. Even if US/Nato don't have a nuclear war there will be heavy damage to equipment and personnel in Europe.If fighting breaks down between Nato/US and Russia, then who knows. US/Nato is stronger in conventional war, but both have nuclear weapons.
According to Russian media, their stated mission in Ukraine would be to protect Russian compatriots.
Apparently, according vz.ru, in Eastern Ukraine's city of Kharkiv, armed Ukrainian right-wing extremists have attacked, killed and wounded some anti-maidan protesters as the right-wing extremists hideout was discovered. One policeman was also severely wounded. About 30 of these right-wing extremists were eventually arrested and held at a police station.
Also regional administrative court in Kharkiv has forbidden any referendum about Kharkiv status, and threatened punishment ranging from warning to fines or imprisonment of up to 15 days for those who attempt to participate.
*
Interesting article alone for the different view in my opinion. Speaking as an European, the lack of support is because we never got a clear picture on what is going on. I have an higher than usual interest in the matter and it is very hard for me to make heads from tails over this whole matter. It is a bit scary to think that nowadays, with internet and the massive amount of information available, how hard it is to find independent on site views on the whole situation. Quite tight information control I say.In this article, the interviewee provides some insight on what happened in the Maidan square and the role that the several political organizations had in the protests.
He begins to explain that the role of the Nazi party Svoboda was minor in the middle of all the protests. What gave them more visibility was the fact that they were the first parliamentary group to join the protests.
Then he proceeds to explain the intervention of the unions in the whole process. According to the interviewee the official (state) unions were not present whereas the independent union was. This independent union tried to organize a massive strike to paralyze the Ukrainian Industry which would help increase the pressure on the government. He explains the failure to organize a massive strike to the hold of the Oligarchs over the Ukrainian economy. The service sector however managed to organize some limited strikes.
He proceeds to provide some historical insight on the whole Ukrainian situation through the failed proposal to recognize Russian as the official language and provides his insight on the Crimean situation as a way of Russian to reinforce internally by discrediting political alternatives.
Finally he proceeds to criticize Europe and the west for their slowness in responding to the whole crisis and shows some surprise on the lack of support by European population.
Good sign you're dealing with misinformation: they called it a "brigade", which, to my knowledge, the USAF/USAAC/USAAF has NEVER called an aviation unit. I don't even know think the US Army calls its flying units brigades (brigade is the headquarters units); Gremlin could confirm this, though.“Judging by its identification number, UAV MQ-5B belonged to the 66th American Reconnaissance Brigade, based in Bavaria,” the statement claimed...