The U.S. has always wanted close defence ties with Malaysia. For various reasons, Malaysia - unlike some of her neighbours - has traditionally downplayed her defence ties with the U.S. but it is important to bear in mind that despite past strained bilateral ties; the defence relationship was never affected. The recently concluded ''MALUS'' and ''Cope Taufan'' - which saw the Raptors debut in a regional exercise - are indications that defence ties are not only entering a new level but that a message is being sent to China that Malaysia is keeping her options open. During the same period as ''Cope Taufan'' there were also a number of visits by senior U.S. military officials. This year's ''Kris Strike'' will see the 1st deployment of the Stryker to Malaysia.
I get the point you're trying to make but recent events mean that the ''opposition kettle'' and it supporters [both in country and abroad] can't call the the'' ruling government pot'' black. Also, the coalition is not currently in any trouble over alleged election fraud claims.
I dis-agree. Malaysia did what it could but certain things it couldn't do; without the help and cooperation of others. There are probably various things that were done behind the scenes that will not reach the public domain: the fact we don't hear about it doesn't necessary mean Malaysia is not ''active''. For various reasons I believe letting others take charge of the MH17 investigation was the right and prudent move. Eastern Europe is not our backyard and countries we have good relations with have better or more influence in the region.
At the end of the day Malaysia has a tough balancing act to perform; with regards to its relations with various other countries. Irrespective of whether decisions taken are sound and are driven by realpolitik; there will still be local and foreign detractors insisting that these decisions are flawed and don't benefit Malaysia.
Last edited:
