alexkvaskov
New Member
It's also militias blocking the Ukrainian units and confiscating their vehicles.
http://twower.livejournal.com/1268980.html
http://twower.livejournal.com/1268980.html
Russian media is claiming some soldiers defected, but it's unconfirmed. The Ukrainian government has said that six armoured vehicles were seized by militants - apparently after they were blockaded by local sympathisers.Anyway I saw pics on BBC of pro-Russian seperatists on armoured vehicles. Were there defections of Ukrainian armoured units?
I'll look for the polls tonight, I forgot where I found them. As to the young people being involved, I didn't say there were no young people that are in favor of joining Russia, I said that the numbers decreased the younger they were.If you have the polls please share. I think there is a lot of truth to what you say. That having been said, the photo and video material gathered so far shows a lot of younger people involved, and the use of social media sites to coordinate these actions between people, and even cities, also speaks against your theory that this is an aging and small minority. I do think that the people protesting are a motivated minority, but they are a very large minority and they cannot be ignored. I think the majority of the population is politically inert, and while it has some opinion on things, it's not motivated or polarized enough to take to the streets to fight for their views, which is what it has come to (and not just in the East, let us not forget that the government in Kiev was brought to power by a determined, well organized, and armed minority).
That's pretty well sums it up actually. It is a minority that is driving events but it is an active highly motivated minority as compared to an apathetic majority.Like I wrote earlier, Ukraine is not a democracy, and the mind set of the population there is not that of a democratic nation. In the East, the politically active element of the population (and not a small one either) is heavily pro-Russian. It has tacit support of a lot of locals who support them not so much in favor of Russia, as against Kiev.
As for federalization, remember Russian didn't suggest a referendum on it. Russia suggested Ukraine federalize. The point of the federalization is to weaken the central government, and make it forever impossible for Ukraine to join NATO, or even the EU, under some particularly active pro-Western leader. It's an intelligent move on Russia's part, and had the west grabbed on to it, it could have been used to de-escalate the current tensions, but it might be too late now regardless.
Also remember, the more urbanized an area is, the higher the percentage of Russian population, and Russian speakers. And it's been the cities that have become centers of resistance, Lugansk and Donetsk, sending out groups of activists and fighters to locales. In a few cases villages and small towns have also played their part, but their overall impact is significantly less. This will not be decided at the election polls. It will either be decided between closed doors using international diplomacy, or on the field of battle.
After all the majority may not be for independence, but they are certainly not willing to take to the streets to stop those who are from making it happen. So far it's been the opposite. Those who disagree in the east mostly sit home, and those who are for it take to the streets in massive numbers. The pro-Ukrainian protests that did take place usually involved bussed in activists from Kiev, or elsewhere.
I think we agree then. Though to be honest I'm not sure what a practical alternative would have been for Russia.I do think that in the long run, Russia is going to regret all this. The long term economic consequences are going to be considerable, not from the sanctions but from Europe buying their energy needs elsewhere. That leaves Russia in a bad position having only China as a potential growth customer. As monlithic as Russia's exports are, it will be painful.
In the long run, south and south-east Asia will intensify growth in infrastructure, industry and manufacturing, so the energy market south of Russia is only going to grow. On the other hand, gas from hydraulic fracturing is going to cost more than gas obtained using traditional extraction methods. So Europe will just end up paying a higher price for costlier gas plus transportation and shipping costs across the Atlantic. In addition, this scheme for switching to shipping compressed gas to Europe instead of piping, has a very high fixed cost (start-up cost) due to infrastructure needs and is a deadweight loss to world economy. My only wish is that this monstrosity is not funded by taxpayer money in the interest of homeland security, but by whoever had economic interest in it in the first place.I do think that in the long run, Russia is going to regret all this. The long term economic consequences are going to be considerable, not from the sanctions but from Europe buying their energy needs elsewhere. That leaves Russia in a bad position having only China as a potential growth customer. As monlithic as Russia's exports are, it will be painful.
Way to go Feanor.Update.
While all that is true, it's not the real issue. Russia is very limited by geography in petro export potential. Most of the infrastructure that has been built to export LNG and petro product is built to service Europe. Sending these exports to the east is extremely limited due to current pipeline limitations. The problem for Russia is that if they want to export natural gas to the east they are extremely limited as to potential export customers. Take a look at the map, geographically China is the only realistic customer in even the medium term. I suppose they could build a pipeline to vladivostok but that would remove many of the competitive advantages they currently have. Exporting from vladivostok would not only involve a few thousand kilometers of extra pipeline but it would also require LNG loading facilities and tankers.In the long run, south and south-east Asia will intensify growth in infrastructure, industry and manufacturing, so the energy market south of Russia is only going to grow. On the other hand, gas from hydraulic fracturing is going to cost more than gas obtained using traditional extraction methods. So Europe will just end up paying a higher price for costlier gas plus transportation and shipping costs across the Atlantic. In addition, this scheme for switching to shipping compressed gas to Europe instead of piping, has a very high fixed cost (start-up cost) due to infrastructure needs and is a deadweight loss to world economy. My only wish is that this monstrosity is not funded by taxpayer money in the interest of homeland security, but by whoever had economic interest in it in the first place.
As someone who had his share of civil war, popular "uprisings", and national revolutions during the wars in former Yugoslavia, I think I can perceive what is going on in Ukraine at the moment, and I think you are partially wrong.SACEUR
It’s hard to fathom that groups of armed men in masks suddenly sprang forward from the population in eastern Ukraine and systematically began to occupy government facilities. It’s hard to fathom because it’s simply not true. What is happening in eastern Ukraine is a military operation that is well planned and organized and we assess that it is being carried out at the direction of Russia.
Mainly just an FYI here, not that this should be surprising after the events in Crimea.
I would assume everyone has seen the agreement to de-escalate things in the eastern Ukraine, does anyone think that will really be successful?
With a major caveat. There are major popular components to both sides of the conflict. Those people need to be adequately represented. The pro-Western population sees all their problems stemming from being like Russia. The pro-Russian population sees all their problems from not being like Russia. They're both partially right, in the sense that either option would certainly be preferable to what they have today. The problem is that neither side wants to talk rationally, and neither side is seems willing to compromise.I think the President of the Czech Republic has hit the nail on the head.
They did not suddenly spring forward. Western media just ignored the situation in eastern Ukraine, until it got to this stage. Actually there were peaceful protests when the euro-Maydan took over Kiev. They went ignored. There were peaceful takeovers of administration buildings by unmasked locals after Yanukovich fell and the new government took power, but they were beaten back by the police, and chased out. There were violent takeovers, with sticks, and stones, of government buildings, (not dissimilar to the tactics of the euro-Maydan against the police) but even then the government chose to escalate and use more violence (like in Nikolaev and Kharkov). They even had to use special MVD units because local police refused to do it. People were also getting arrested and charged with crimes. That's when they started to wear masks. And instead of taking over the government building they seized the SBU buildings. They proceeded to open the arsenals there (which is where the weapons came from). Now there are a bunch of armed and semi-organized militias running around.It’s hard to fathom that groups of armed men in masks suddenly sprang forward from the population in eastern Ukraine and systematically began to occupy government facilities.
Your post expands a bit on what SACEUR's blog post said and really isn't in disagreement with it. I don't disagree with it either. I agree that it is probably 90% citizens of Ukraine.As someone who had his share of civil war, popular "uprisings", and national revolutions during the wars in former Yugoslavia, I think I can perceive what is going on in Ukraine at the moment, and I think you are partially wrong.
Crimean operation was a military operation, and that is the reason why there was almost no casualties there. It was executed by the Russian special forces, over which, Russia, naturally, had complete control in every moment. Local militias, paramilitaries, and such, appeared only after the occupation was de facto done deal.
What is happening in eastern Ukraine, at the moment is a whole different story. There it is militias, who are running the show, with the Russian troops on the opposite side of the border. No one would have been surprised if one was to learn that Russian agents helped armed groups in eastern Ukraine to coordinate their actions, or that indeed among them, there are some Russian citizens. However, 90% of those who protest, who block the roads, and who are members of local militias are citizens of Ukraine - locals, who are in the same time intimidated and angry by violent anti-Russian rhetoric of the ultra right part of the Kiev government, as well as fueled by the exaggerations of Putin's propaganda.
My experience from Yugoslavia is, that the members of the self organised paramilitary units are, by default, a mixture of idealistic hotheads, honest citizens willing to fight for "freedom", petty criminals interested in looting, and bunch of trigger happy adrenaline junkies,hooligans,etc ... you name it.
These people are not easy to control, and they will disregard orders even from Moscow if they see it fit. Bottom line: it is easy to give people guns - it is much harder to make them to bring the guns back, especially if those people are already exercising some kind of power, by the very fact that they posses these guns.
So I was not at all surprised by the words of the leaders of the Donetsk revolt, that they find themselves not obliged to follow any deal brokered by Russia, because Russia speaks for her self, not the Donetsk...
I think, that both West and Russia, had their share in escalating the situation. West by offering political support to Maidan protesters, Russians of course, by occupying Crimea, and offering support to eastern Ukrainian "insurgents", but at this present moment, it is neither Russia, nor West, not even the Kiev government who is in control of the situation, and it will remain like that in a while.
I agree that they didn't suddenly spring forward, but as I said in my reply above this, it's pretty highly unlikely that local militias that have only existed a few weeks would exhibit the degree of professionalism and efficiency that is being displayed. Considering the level of competence the Ukranian army is exhibiting, it's pretty unlikely these assaults are being conducted by Ukranian army defectors either.Feanor;277727 They did not [i said:suddenly[/i] spring forward. Western media just ignored the situation in eastern Ukraine, until it got to this stage. Actually there were peaceful protests when the euro-Maydan took over Kiev. They went ignored. There were peaceful takeovers of administration buildings by unmasked locals after Yanukovich fell and the new government took power, but they were beaten back by the police, and chased out. There were violent takeovers, with sticks, and stones, of government buildings, (not dissimilar to the tactics of the euro-Maydan against the police) but even then the government chose to escalate and use more violence (like in Nikolaev and Kharkov). They even had to use special MVD units because local police refused to do it. People were also getting arrested and charged with crimes. That's when they started to wear masks. And instead of taking over the government building they seized the SBU buildings. They proceeded to open the arsenals there (which is where the weapons came from). Now there are a bunch of armed and semi-organized militias running around.
Did the hint to grab SBU buildings come from Russia? Quite possible. Actually I saw on many Russian and Ukrainian live journals, people writing that instead of seizing the government administration buildings, the protesters should seize police stations and SBU buildings, because there are weapons there, and because force wielding agencies are the way the new government holds power. So it may not have require a Russian suggestion.
I think the degree of professionalism shown by the militias varies greatly and although not wanting to discount any kind of Russian (or Western) involvement, if you have a small group of people with prior knowledge on the matter it would be pretty easy to organize them simply by bundling them together. I imagine they would show up if they got word of the taking over of sdu buildings. I would in their place.I agree that they didn't suddenly spring forward, but as I said in my reply above this, it's pretty highly unlikely that local militias that have only existed a few weeks would exhibit the degree of professionalism and efficiency that is being displayed. Considering the level of competence the Ukranian army is exhibiting, it's pretty unlikely these assaults are being conducted by Ukranian army defectors either.
Also it's not like russia doesn't have a precedent in the Ukraine for sending in troops to accomplish their goals. Putin has shown he is willing to push things in the Ukraine as far as he can, why would he hesitate at sending in some special operation troops to assist? Keep in mind I say this at a time when I wouldn't be surprised if some NATO countries had some people in Ukraine as advisers at this very moment.
What degree of professionalism? Government buildings were seized by crowds, multiple times, with various levels of damage and looting. From the photos, videos, and eyewitness reports, you can see that the blockading of Ukrainian army units is done by crowds of locals including women and the elderly. Every once in a while you see a few photos of armed and variously equipped militia men. Some of them could be professionals, from the looks of it, but then don't forget these militias include a lot of ex-service members, and ex-law enforcement. As for a few weeks, pro-Russian political and social organizations predate the current crisis, and while I don't know the details, I wouldn't be surprised to see that they became the sources for these militias.I agree that they didn't suddenly spring forward, but as I said in my reply above this, it's pretty highly unlikely that local militias that have only existed a few weeks would exhibit the degree of professionalism and efficiency that is being displayed. Considering the level of competence the Ukranian army is exhibiting, it's pretty unlikely these assaults are being conducted by Ukranian army defectors either.