The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread

[rsemmes]

Even if that were true, how is that different from any other war? Lend-Lease also changed the course and duration of the war against Germany. You said yourself that this is normal. "Like in every war". Yet somehow it only turns the supplier into the “real” opponent when Russia needs an excuse for poor battlefield performance.

Is your “we’re fighting NATO” fairy tale really easier to swallow than admitting that Ukraine, with outside help, has resisted Russia's poorly planned and executed invasion?

War is a business, that is normal.
I didn't say anything about poor performance, but about how long the show has been going on. Hoover just pointed out why the show was still going on in 2024... Well, all right, some fantasy about China giving Russia ∼$90bn for free.
I don't think Russia planned an invasion and a war, it planned a SMO; like the bunch of traitors who planned a coup d'etat in Spain in 1936. It was just as good as the US after-the-Iraq-war planning.
The real opponent is Ukraine... fighting with NATO weapons while NATO money keeps the country running.
No ex-Soviet army needs and excuse for bad performance, no army needs an excuse; not even the US army in Vietnam, Afghanistan or the 3rd battle of Fallujah. Sorry, was I pointing out at any bad performance or at keeping Ukraine "in the fight"? As we love repeating. Did the Robotine offensive failed because of Russian bad performance?
BTW, I still think that calling an offensive planned in a NATO HQ in a NATO country "NATO offensive" is fair, even if not completely accurate; everyone understood what offensive I was talking about without feeling outraged. I have mentioned the Kursk return ticket before, never the NATO return ticket.

What I still haven't been able to find is how Ukraine is going to "win". Well, not even Tisdall was able to swallow that and added the "or holding its own". Not in the battlefield, it seems that we all agree with that. Not with the economy, whatever is left of the 90bn plus another 70bn just to hold in 2027. Talking about Ukraine defeating Russia with missiles its just a joke... well, another one; and a sad joke for Ukraine.

Edit
Is the las paragraph, maybe, reality trumping fairy tales?
The pun was intended with the first Trump, I forgot to mention.

 

[swerve]

Russia invaded Ukraine with armies, not with small bands trying to launch a coup. Multiple columns of armoured vehicles & tens of thousands of soldiers crossed the border simultaneously at several points. Maybe 150,000 men were in the initial invasion force, with many more in reserve, & a few thousand tanks.

That's an invasion. No doubt about it.

It seems clear that they expected a quick & easy victory, just like Franco, Mola, Sanjurjo et al did in 1936, but it certainly wasn't a coup. They expected fighting - just not as much as they got. They didn't have hundreds of thousands of troops ready for nothing.

 

[deyhere]

Then Russia can take responsibility for its own decisions. Being pressured by the West does not establish that it had no choice but to invade Ukraine. If you think invasion was the right choice, defend that choice instead of blaming the West for Russia’s decision.

Russia does not regret invading Ukraine, they regret not invading earlier than they did, there's talk of upgrading the smo to an actual war and finishing the job.


And you think Russia is up there with the US and China? Really?


Russia may not be up there with the US and China but Russia is a big contributor and facilitator


And you still haven’t answered the question: would a change of government in France forces Germany invading it?


if the change of government was as a result of a Russian sponsored coup then anything can happen, we all see what happened in Romania

 

[rsemmes]

Russia invaded Ukraine with armies, not with small bands trying to launch a coup. Multiple columns of armoured vehicles & tens of thousands of soldiers crossed the border simultaneously at several points. Maybe 150,000 men were in the initial invasion force, with many more in reserve, & a few thousand tanks.

That's an invasion. No doubt about it.

It seems clear that they expected a quick & easy victory, just like Franco, Mola, Sanjurjo et al did in 1936, but it certainly wasn't a coup. They expected fighting - just not as much as they got. They didn't have hundreds of thousands of troops ready for nothing.

I agree... And I strongly disagree with your "small bands", that is all they had.
13m in Afghanistan, 44m in Ukraine, scale is important. Do armies plan and expect anything but victory?

 

[KipPotapych]

It appears people are beginning to clue in about the Flamingo program (read scam). A few examples:



From here (an exchange with the CEO):

Good day, Ms. Irina. You received a codification index for the Flamingo FP-5 cruise missile in October 2025. It was codified as a drone, supposedly to facilitate its launch into production. Your company has not codified any more missiles since then. In July 2026, Denys Shytlerman stated that you were already producing 3 Flamingo FP-5 missiles per day—the same Denys had reported back in March 2026. That amounts to 90 missiles per month. On August 20, 2025, President Zelenskyy announced that mass production of the state-of-the-art long-range Flamingo (FP-5) missile should begin in Ukraine by early 2026. The President called the Flamingo the "most successful" among all Ukrainian weapons currently in existence. On November 19, 2024, Zelenskyy tasked the production of 3,000 cruise missiles by the end of 2025. As we all understand, your company was the primary producer. And now you are stating that this was a political statement about cruise missile production, that you did not count on it, and planned to switch straight to ballistics. You have already reported twice that you received codification for the ballistic missile F7 in June 2026 and in August 2026. Both times, you reported that codification takes 2-4 weeks. But you still haven't received the code. Thus, Ukraine has neither cruise missiles nor ballistic ones (at least not yet); you have one more month to launch ballistic missiles at Moscow, as your company promised. Shytlerman promised by the end of autumn, you by the end of the year. Where did the cruise missiles go, Ms. Irina? By the most conservative estimates, you should have made about 1,000 of them. Or did the Ministry of Defense not order them from you? Don't answer that—it's a state secret. All the figures and dates I cited are in the public domain.

From here:

In the story with the pink flamingo, which suddenly transformed from the most powerful weapon into a "political statement," just as King Midas's gold turned back into shit, there are a heap of important questions.

First off, who, how, and with what intent deceived the President of Ukraine, who as far back as August last year called "Flamingo" the "best missile," and informed the public about the launch of serial production?..

Also in August this year, President Zelenskyy ordered "Flamingo" missiles to "fly off to winter in Russia."

It turns out that someone deliberately fed the head of state and supreme commander-in-chief false information that undermined his reputation and sparked distrust in society toward the words of the country's leader.

Second, who, with what intent, in the General Staff made incompetent decisions—and perhaps deliberately harmful ones—about deploying the so-called "Flamingo missile," which in reality turned out to be a "political statement"..

I’ll remind you that high-ranking General Staff representatives were even present at the pompous Fire Point press conference in November last year.

Third, who and with what intent in the Ministry of Defense made decisions about procuring these so-called "Flamingo missiles," which turned out to be a "political statement"..

Over the entire existence of this "political statement," about 100 "Flamingo missiles" were manufactured and launched—both in tests and "in combat."

Based on ShtilerMAN's statements that the missile cost the Ukrainian budget $600,000, it turns out that just to scare Putin, at least $60 million was spent. ShtilerMAN also repeatedly said that the Fire Point company was developing—or had already developed—its own engine for this "missile"; how much that project cost is unknown.

Terekh's claim that the state didn't spend a single penny on development is false, because Fire Point has no other source of funding besides state money or funds from our partners that are channeled into the budget. This is all OUR MONEY.

It's intriguing who exactly made the decisions to start developing the "missile," serial production, deployment, halting production.. Could it really have been Iryna Terekh herself.. That can't happen in the arms market. The Verkhovna Rada's ad hoc investigative commission, the relevant Rada committee—they need to sort this out; I also see signs of criminal offenses here.

There's work here for NABU too, and for the DBR, which stubbornly turns a blind eye to cases worth billions of dollars but has persistently been trying—for a whole year already!—to throw the entire Kasyanov family behind bars for those accurate strikes on Moscow.



People began to really “suspect” after FirePoint posted that last video:



It’s cute that they/some still think that this is just miscommunication and Zelensky was not aware. The thing was as clear as bright sunny day from the start and commented on by me as such. Wait till they hear about their new epic ballistic missiles (what colour will they be?). And the air defense frejas or whatever they called them. Gon’ produce cheap missiles better than Tomahawks enough for the whole Europe and then some though!