The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread

[deyhere]

I do not post much in this thread, as the topic does not really hold my interest. Having said that though, I have to as the following question.

Are you posting here in an attempt to troll the forum, or are you trying to provide comic relief with your posts?

No, why do you think so? i am sharing my honest opinion like every other member of the forum

 

[Todjaeger]

No, why do you think so? i am sharing my honest opinion like every other member of the forum

Given the content of your posts, or more specifically what you appear to be claiming is happening in the conflict between Ukraine and Russia. If all of NATO was actually fighting Russia, things would almost certainly be quite different. There would likely be a great deal more high value and/or strategic targets being hit in strikes within Russia than Ukraine has managed to date. Also, some of the areas struck would likely be a great distance further away from Ukraine, places like Murmansk or Vladivostok, or even St. Petersburg.

Instead of sanctions, there would likely be a great deal more happening if there was an active conflict between NATO and Russia.

 

[KipPotapych]

@personaldesas, it appears that my less vodka math was relatively on point. One of us (me and Ronald) is wrong about the internal demand here and I am going to say it is me, but will not insist (laughing):

View attachment 55906

PS I am sure he is still using the harvest season numbers for the internal demand and will do so to the mid- or late- November, when the exports will rise sharply all else being equal -> I won’t be surprised if we see half a mil plus bpd heading out of the country.

Looks like my (less) vodka math was better than relatively on point, but was exactly
on point.



The prudent question is whether the strikes on refineries will intensify after the Republicans lose Congress (though there will still be a couple of months for transition).