The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread

Ikimieli

Member
These things what i mentioned now in here, might be one of the base reasons why Ukrainians want out of Russian influence. They are tired of their attitude of disrespect towards your subjects or vassals, and they are tired of disrespect on them. But once they hurt you bad enough, the respect will come from there.

This is what they have been saying all along. That Russia only understands power.

SamB: That was a suggestion to the capitalists. I am not a capitalists and i understand your points.

But Mercenaries are a valuable asset if your goal is to win.

The way i represent it, is on purpose like this. More twisted the better the capitalists like it.

Capitalists lack all these things what you describe. You wont find them in capitalist world. They will sell you these things, or the image of it. But its not real. Its only for you to believe in, so that you sacrifice yourself for them.

There is really not much honorable people, or governments out there. But they all like to sell the image. They are cheats actually.

If those things you describe would exist on the leadership, these things might not happen and world would be a wonderful place.

I really would like what you describe more.

But what about the Russians. Is what they do along the lines what you speak of ?

What you speak of is the exact image that the Ukrainians want to build. But how much of it is real ?

And if they want to push Russians back and reclaim their territory. What would be the most meaningful way for them to do it ? To use drones and mercenaries and avoid Ukrainian losses. Or use Ukrainian citizens who sacrifice their life instead of a drone or mercenary ?

Which would be preferable. A dead Ukrainian. A destroyed Drone. Or a dead Foreign Mercenary ?

Or which would be preferable. A dead Russian. A destroyed Drone. A Dead Foreign Mercenary. Or a Dead Russian Tatar or Chechen ? They would most likely first lose a Drone, then Mercenary, Then Minority, then Russian people.

If you want to preserve your people. Throwing them in the harm's way by the millions is then what ?

And you still have the objectives that you need to accomplish. And to do so seems almost impossible, but you still need to do it.

All kind of ideals and ideologies of a honorable battle, where only Ukrainians charge and drive the Russians away, might only lead to millions of dead Ukrainians. They had the professionalism and honor, but now they are dead when Russian mercenaries and drones pummel them to ground.

Maybe the best use of a soldier is not in the battlefield, but in the factory.

"A soldier motivated by currency will choose their own life every time, resulting in mutiny. " This is why Russians shoot them. They install fear in them, and control them trough terror. They have always done this. They position their own troops behind them, and make them clear everyone is shot immediately if they turn back. Fear is also a motivator, and some systems use fear and terror. Then other thing to do is kidnap their relatives and love ones and threaten to kill or torture them if the soldier wont do as they tell them. There is no honor in that. But you gain results either way.

There is always these stories that good wins from an impossible odds, and vanguish evil by some miracle. But just look at the Russian territories. You really think they were handed them voluntarily. No, they are conquering and will do so endlessly, until they have conquered and vassalized the whole world. They push the front. Their current administration wants to mark at least the conquer of 4 Oblasts from Ukraine. Preferably more. Then they continue later. They aim to push for Moldova, and annex Ukraine and Moldova both. Then they go for other countries until they have conquered all of Europe. Then they go for other areas and expand endlessly. The only way to push them back is by force. And if you lack the will, and the force. Then what ?

Everything they say is a lie. There is no real reasons. The only reason is they want to conquer more land. They give you honorable stories about history, about "liberating" their people from those areas and that kind. Why exactly those people are there in the first place ? They have been moving their own people from this narrative. They push their own people inside other nation border, then they declare independence and come to "save" those people. This is the exact same what US did to Mexico and then annexed California and Texas. They pushed their people in as immigrants. Then those people declare independence. Then Mexico try to re establish their territory. Then US declare war and beat Mexican army, and then annex the territories. The Russian people in Donbas and Crimea are there only for one reason. To give a narrative to "save them" and the past administrations have been placing them there for this reason only.

You see Russian people moving in your country. They start to populate your border area. After 20 years they declare independence and their Army comes in to save them and annex your territories on pretext that they are "saving" and "liberating" their people who happens to reside inside your borders. The reason Russians are packed in Donbas is because its border region and to be annexed. There is no other reason. Everything else is a lie.

This is the exact reason, why Finland have monitored Russian populace in Finland very closely, and made certain that they never become majority in any area but remain a minority. Russia have also been caught on installing a proxy inside Finland, in an attempt to be activated when and if the Russian attack on Finland comes. The plot was denied. They started to buy strategic properties in strategic positions, and smuggle stuff in to establish a network to attack Finland from inside among the Russian invasion of Finland. The have also monitored Finnish army, so that the Russians wont infiltrate it from within. They install these as precaution. That if they attack, they have them in there. It might not result as an attack. But they prepare actively to attack everyone they can that if they happen to do so, they have forces and infrastructure inside that region already.

The people who last lived in Crimea were actually Turkish Tatars. But they were forcibly removed from there and replaced by Russians for geopolitical reason.

Lets say that Russia would be Australia's neighbor, and they would attack Australia. You would have a land route. Would your honor win the day, when they push endless amount of mercenaries, convicts and drones to conquer your territories that are driven either by money, or fear, or both.

You have ideals, honor, professionalism. You have tens of times fewer soldiers. You have tens of times fewer equipment.

You cannot win wars with ideals, honors, professionalism alone. You need actual military power. And in a capitalist world, you can actually buy it.

In the other thread you are speaking about equipment what you buy. Where you need that equipment if honor, ideals and professionalism will win the day regardless ?

It actually wont. The nation with one million missiles is actually just pummeling you.


This is what they are building now still. They are building a drone army, so that human lives, soldier lives can be saved. They want to use a robot, not a live person. And if they use live people, they would rather use any other than their own citizens.

In other thread, you told that Australia is not scared to put their people in the harm's way. Europe dont share that perspective. They are scared. They would rather send a drone or mercenary, than their own citizens.


What Ukrainians say is true. The only way to stop Russians is to give them so much hurt, that they have no other options. The only language they know is Power. There is no peace negotiations. The only real peace negotiation comes trough power. The moment they start to lose too much, they cannot continue. Which means that to achieve this, their society and people must be crippled. And they must be subdued with military might.

Honor, ideals and Professionalism wont help in this. You need to actually pummel them to submission and make them surrender so that they say "no more. Please. Stop. No more. We surrender. Keep your territories. Just make it stop. Just leave us alone."

And how i understand. They will. Russian society will be destroyed in the form it is today. And it will transform because of this. Their people will be traumatized for generations to come. Ukraine, and Russia both. It is in every nations interest who reside near Russia, and they reside near a lot of nations, to weaken them to the point that they become weak. And then in the same means that they aim to install quotas on Ukrainian Army, after vanguishing Russia, they must be installed these same quotas. You can then control what kind of military equipment they can have or build, how many soldiers they can have and so. But to achieve this, you need to conquer Russia first. So basically. You first wait until they are weakened. Then you attack them with overwhelming force. Then you remove their government and install a government that is more to your liking and then subdue that government to your will. The same thing that happened in Venezuela. It is not as easy.

After you do this. They become very nice to you. There is no more problem. Their people have been used to vassalization already, so they will adapt fast. And they know they have no options. Who knows, they might actually like the new Russia to come. More than this what they have now. They gain more freedoms actually. And might fare a lot better as individuals. And then, after few generations, they, and their territories can be attached to NATO and EU. This is one of the possibilities, and a very real one. But to achieve this, you must first conquer them. And that is not easy. They are currently thinking how. The question is not why or should. It is how. And in how there is only one problem: Nuclear Arsenal.
 
Last edited:

SamB

Member
These things what i mentioned now in here, might be one of the base reasons why Ukrainians want out of Russian influence. They are tired of your attitude of disrespect towards your subjects or vassals, and they are tired of your disrespecting them. But once they hurt you bad enough, the respect will come from there.

This is what they have been saying all along. That Russia only understands power.

SamB: That was a suggestion to the capitalists. I am not a capitalists and i understand your points.

But Mercenaries are a valuable asset if your goal is to win.

The way i represent it, is on purpose like this. More twisted the better the capitalists like it.

Capitalists lack all these things what you describe. You wont find them in capitalist world. They will sell you these things, or the image of it. But its not real. Its only for you to believe in, so that you sacrifice yourself for them.

There is really not much honorable people, or governments out there. But they all like to sell the image. They are cheats actually.

If those things you describe would exist on the leadership, these things might not happen and world would be a wonderful place.

I really would like what you describe more.

But what about the Russians. Is what they do along the lines what you speak of ?

What you speak of is the exact image that the Ukrainians want to build. But how much of it is it real ?

And if they want to push Russians back and reclaim their territory. What would be the most meaningful way for them to do it ? To use drones and mercenaries and avoid Ukrainian losses. Or use Ukrainian citizens who sacrifice their life instead of a drone or mercenary ?

Which would be preferable. A dead Ukrainian. A destroyed Drone. Or a dead Foreign Mercenary ?

Or which would be preferable. A dead Russian. A destroyed Drone. A Dead Foreign Mercenary. Or a Dead Russian Tatar or Chechen ? They would most likely first lose a Drone, then Mercenary, Then Minority, then Russian people.

If you want to preserve your people. Throwing them in the harm's way by the millions is then what ?

And you still have the objectives that you need to accomplish. And to do so seems almost impossible, but you still need to do it.

All kind of ideals and ideologies of a honorable battle, where only Ukrainians charge and drive the Russians away, might only lead to millions of dead Ukrainians. They had the professionalism and honor, but now they are dead when Russian mercenaries and drones pummel them to ground.

Maybe the best use of a soldier is not in the battlefield, but in the factory.

"A soldier motivated by currency will choose their own life every time, resulting in mutiny. " This is why Russians shoot them. They install fear in them, and control them trough terror. They have always done this. They position their own troops behind them, and make them clear everyone is shot immediately if they turn back. Fear is also a motivator, and some systems use fear and terror. Then other thing to do is kidnap their relatives and love ones and threaten to kill or torture them if the soldier wont do as they tell them. There is no honor in that. But you gain results either way.

There is always these stories that good wins from an impossible odds, and vanguish evil by some miracle. But just look at the Russian territories. You really think they were handed them voluntarily. No, they are conquering and will do so endlessly, until they have conquered and vassalized the whole world. They push the front. Their current administration wants to mark at least the conquer of 4 Oblasts from Ukraine. Preferably more. Then they continue later. They aim to push for Moldova, and annex Ukraine and Moldova both. Then they go for other countries until they have conquered all of Europe. Then they go for other areas and expand endlessly. The only way to push them back is by force. And if you lack the will, and the force. Then what ?

Everything they say is a lie. There is no real reasons. The only reason is they want to conquer more land. They give you honorable stories about history, about "liberating" their people from those areas and that kind. Why exactly those people are there in the first place ? They have been moving their own people from this narrative. They push their own people inside other nation border, then they declare independence and come to "save" those people. This is the exact same what US did to Mexico and then annexed California and Texas. They pushed their people in as immigrants. Then those people declare independence. Then Mexico try to re establish their territory. Then US declare war and beat Mexican army, and then annex the territories. The Russian people in Donbas and Crimea are there only for one reason. To give a narrative to "save them" and the past administrations have been placing them there for this reason only.

You see Russian people moving in your country. They start to populate your border area. After 20 years they declare independence and their Army comes in to save them and annex your territories on pretext that they are "saving" and "liberating" their people who happens to reside inside your borders. The reason Russians are packed in Donbas is because its border region and to be annexed. There is no other reason. Everything else is a lie.

This is the exact reason, why Finland have monitored Russian populace in Finland very closely, and made certain that they never become majority in any area but remain a minority. Russia have also been caught on installing a proxy inside Finland, in an attempt to be activated when and if the Russian attack on Finland comes. The plot was denied. They started to buy strategic properties in strategic positions, and smuggle stuff in to establish a network to attack Finland from inside among the Russian invasion of Finland. The have also monitored Finnish army, so that the Russians wont infiltrate it from within. They install these as precaution. That if they attack, they have them in there. It might not result as an attack. But they prepare actively to attack everyone they can that if they happen to do so, they have forces and infrastructure inside that region already.

The people who last lived in Crimea were actually Turkish Tatars. But they were forcibly removed from there and replaced by Russians for geopolitical reason.

Lets say that Russia would be Australia's neighbor, and they would attack Australia. You would have a land route. Would your honor win the day, when they push endless amount of mercenaries, convicts and drones to conquer your territories that are driven either by money, or fear, or both.

You have ideals, honor, professionalism. You have tens of times fewer soldiers. You have tens of times fewer equipment.

You cannot win wars with ideals, honors, professionalism alone. You need actual military power. And in a capitalist world, you can actually buy it.

In the other thread you are speaking about equipment what you buy. Where you need that equipment if honor, ideals and professionalism will win the day regardless ?

It actually wont. The nation with one million missiles is actually just pummeling you.


This is what they are building now still. They are building a drone army, so that human lives, soldier lives can be saved. They want to use a robot, not a live person. And if they use live people, they would rather use any other than their own citizens.

In other thread, you told that Australia is not scared to put their people in the harm's way. Europe dont share that perspective. They are scared. They would rather send a drone or mercenary, than their own citizens.


What Ukrainians say is true. The only way to stop Russians is to give them so much hurt, that they have no other options. The only language they know is Power. There is no peace negotiations. The only real peace negotiation comes trough power. The moment they start to lose too much, they cannot continue. Which means that to achieve this, their society and people must be crippled. And they must be subdued with military might.

Honor, ideals and Professionalism wont help in this. You need to actually pummel them to submission and make them surrender so that they say "no more. Please. Stop. No more. We surrender. Keep your territories. Just make it stop. Just leave us alone."

And how i understand. They will. Russian society will be destroyed in the form it is today. And it will transform because of this. Their people will be traumatized for generations to come. Ukraine, and Russia both. It is in every nations interest who reside near Russia, and they reside near a lot of nations, to weaken them to the point that they become weak. And then in the same means that they aim to install quotas on Ukrainian Army, after vanguishing Russia, they must be installed these same quotas. You can then control what kind of military equipment they can have or build, how many soldiers they can have and so. But to achieve this, you need to conquer Russia first. So basically. You first wait until they are weakened. Then you attack them with overwhelming force.
You call that winning? Ukraine was gifted brand new mechanised brigades, fighter jets and embedded trainers and Ukraine kept on pulling punches. Just because Ukraine had big guns doesn't make you the big gun. Don't kid yourself that bigger is better. And neither is newer a replacement for a professional soldier.
 

Ikimieli

Member
Yes. I call that winning.

To cripple the society that is attacking your society. I call that winning.

And / or to conquer them and subdue them militarily. I definetely call that winning.

At the moment Russia is advancing in Ukraine and conquering ever more territories. This is the reality. It actually looks like Russia is winning.

Which is why. They would need to get their act together if they aim to inflict the so called "strategic loss" on Russia.


You might not entirely grasp what i mean.

Lets put it like this.

You have 200 000 Professional Soldiers in your army. Ok. You are fine with it and you go with it. You acquire nothing more and that is all you have.

Then the other you have 200 000 Professional Soldiers in your army. Then you acquire 300 000 Mercenaries and ten million drones.

You understand what i mean ?

You still have the Professional soldiers. You only gain more.

You somehow think, that the Professional soldiers are suddenly removed, and they wont exist anymore. Why would you do that ?

You KEEP your professional soldiers and THEN you hire Mercenaries to supplement them. Which makes their job so much easier and they WILL be thankful to fight along 300 000 Mercenaries when you acquired them to help on their job.

Now you compare those armies. The other have 200 000 Professionals and nothing more.

The other have the same 200 000 Professionals and 300 000 Mercenaries.

Which one you like more ?


Its not about me. I am nothing. I just give ideas and use my boredom. Dont think about me. Think about you. And if there is anything i say that you could use or enjoy, then do that. If not, then im sorry.

My aim is to help. And i want to help Ukraine.

They are losing territory, and they want them back. It will not be easy. And they will not have the strength to do it alone.

And even supporting their cause in internet is helping them, as the Russians aim to undermine it all the time and spread lies.

DO NOT mistake the Russian attack on Ukraine in anything else than conquering a territory from another country. Everything else is a lie.


Would you not accept 300 000 mercenaries if they would come free, to fight along Australia when Austrlia is attacked ?

Would you say "no, we do not accept your help, we use only our own professional soldiers and no outside force can help us it will undermine our army" ?


What i am suggesting is SUPPLEMENTING the existing Ukrainian force with Mercenaries. And the model i gave was meant to be entertaining in the minds of the worst of the capitalists.


Saying no to 300 000 soldiers to help you in war is not exactly very clever. Who would fight for you ,and die for you. Do you disrespect their sacrifice for your country because they made it for money ?

Are you this proud, that you would for example, rather lose a war and lose your country. Than accept help from a mercenary ?

Do you really despise Mercenaries that much ?

Then what about this. Do you get paid salary if you work in Australian army. Does that make you a mercenary and you should work for free. You are actually paid money to work in Australian army to become a professional. So what you do is then wrong ? You should not take the money. Say to them, i dont need the salary. I will work for free because its the just and honorable thing to do.

Are Australian army personnels paid salaries ?

Isnt this what makes them professionals. Professional means that you are being paid. How is mercenary then not a professional. Mercenary is an Independent. But its stlil a Professional fighter. I suggest you not disrespect them and not look down on them. They might actually be more skillful and dangerous than you think. Mercenaries ARE professionals.

Do you think it wont take courage to take up arms and fight for someone who pay you for it ?

What if you do it from honorable reason. Your mother is sick, she needs money for treatment. You have no other options and you are poor. Then they offer you 100 000 dollar to come fight in a war as a mercenary. Do you think that person is complete shit who does that. Who wont have honor ?

He is actually going in there in the harms way, putting his life on the line for his sick mother. And you despise and disrespect him for that ? That he is "trampling on the soldiers honor" ? What is this ?


Then what about work life ? Should all salaries be taken away from all workers. In some societies they wont pay you salaries. In Communist i suppose, they might not. No one have private property.


Either you have understood me completely wrong. Or we have very different world views which makes it interesting.

Australia in itself might be very different than for example, Europe. Which makes also Australian people very different.

You clearly think in a very different way. Me personally, i dont see any wrong in using Mercenaries as long as its voluntary. Meaning, they are not forced to become mercenary, but make the choise on their free will.

Some mercenaries are actually better on what they do, than your average professional army soldier.

People who choose to become mercenaries, are not pushovers. They are solid people.


You speak of Mercenaries as they would make your odds in winning the war lower.

That when you hire mercenaries, your army actually becomes weaker on having them and you would be better without.

I dont understand this at all.


There seems to be also some form of restriction how you can win ? That you can only win on certain terms or way.

If you win on some other way, it wont count as winning. But if it result as a successful operation, why does it matter in the end ?

You conquer the enemy, and enemy is vanquished. No matter how the vanquished enemy say that its not a win. I would still call it a win.

A win is a win. Even if the methods are questionable.

This is why Russians are doing what they do. For example threatening people on rape, killing of their relatives and so, if they dont go there fighting for them. Its not honorable. But they get soldiers still.


What bout your commanding officer. Would they accept mercenaries if they get them for free ?

Or say no and then fight without ?

It takes courage to do what you do. I would take them.

To say no certainly takes courage. To say no to help for ideological reasons.

"im not fighting with them. They are scum"
 
Last edited:

SamB

Member
Yes. I call that winning.

To cripple the society that is attacking your society. I call that winning.

And / or to conquer them and subdue them militarily. I definetely call that winning.

At the moment Russia is advancing in Ukraine and conquering ever more territories. This is the reality.
Mate, your victory parade looks like the Somme with no Treaty of Versailles. At some point you are going to concede. But I will not be there to see it. Far well
 
Top