GermanHerman
Active Member
Georges Malbrunot of Le Figaro cites a french intelligence source claiming that british SAS as well as US Delta Forces are active in ukraine since the first day of the war. Same source claims russia is aware of this.
I think there is a deficit of information from the Russia side that is largely the fault of Russia's own government whose information campaign has been... non-existent? I don't know how else to describe the sad briefings they put out with minimal information and minimal coverage. There are good sources on the Russia side, including people who are moving with rebel units through the war zone, but they are on social media and there is a language barrier. There is also a significant bias, and claims are often made that are not corroborated by the material presented. I try to bridge these two gaps and present these sources 1) in English, making them more accessible, and 2) by filtering to what is either strictly factual or very close to it. When presenting claims I make sure to present them as claims. If I have a personal opinion or stance on the claim being made I include that as well (so if I find a particular claim questionable I will say so and why).@Feanor hello, can you please tell why in your bulletins 95% of the channels are strictly pro-Russian telegrams? To read it that way, only Ukrainian equipment is destroyed.
(this is not a complaint).
For the direction of strike, I can't speak to it. Like I said, if the location of tail part falling is indicative that suggests a launch direction. If not, then not. I was hoping someone with more knowledge on SRBMs might be on here and can jump in.Regarding the investigation of the strike on Kramatorsk by serial numbers - schizophrenia, which is spreading in Z groups. ( at first they appealed to what direction the tail part fell from, but from the video from Berdyansk it became clear that the tail part is significantly twisted and it is impossible to determine the direction of impact. Now the serial numbers are taken)
Moreover, these missiles and all the serial numbers were manufactured by the Soviet Union at the Bryansk factory, and if the AFU had them, then Moscow should certainly have Soviet documents that they were transferred to the Ukrainian armament back during the Soviet era. But there is no such information. Strange again, isn't it?
So far I don't have evidence that this launch took place, only uncorroborated claims. Do you happen to have any footage? Launches get video taped pretty frequently, so I'm still hoping it turns up.There was also a launch from Russian-controlled Shakhtarsk. Everything was blamed on the work of the air defense, but again, this is a sofa opinion, where is the official investigation?
There was an explosion in Kramatorsk right after the work of the air defense system, again, strange.
I actually haven't reviewed Russian MoD statement, I usually ignore their meager attempts at information coverage this war because they are so unhelpful. I just spent some time poking around with a map tool and you're correct. Those two locations are within the range of a Tochka-U strike, Ugledar being a bit closer, and Velikaya Novoselka being close to the range limit.The Russian Defense Ministry also points to the southwest direction of the arrival, claiming that the launch came from Ukraine-controlled Dobropillya. However, there are positions of Russian and "separatist" forces in the south-south-west direction (for example, south of Ugledar and near Velyka Novoselka) within the range of the Tochka-U missile (120 km), which means that the launch could well have taken place from there.
Tail fragment location and serial numbers is about all we have to go on at this time. I'm happy to have someone provide more materials and information. Again I think it's plausible that Russia fired an old Tochka missile in an attempt to hit a piece of railroad infrastructure, missed, and hit a crowd of civilians. I also think it's plausible the launch was not by Russia. Moving a Tochka unit from Belarus all the way to Ugledar without anyone else spotting it, is a bit of a long shot, in my opinion. We've seen very little of this Russian Tochka unit until just now. I'm curious whether it's because this unit is being hidden (but if so, why was it being transported without so much as a tarp through Belarus?) or it's because the unit hasn't really seen much action.I also do not deny that it could have been Ukrainian-controlled forces, because a couple of days earlier, Zelensky had authorized the use of such systems for the territorial defense of Ukraine. Therefore, they could have easily used them on civilians due to inexperience or on other purpose. It should be a normal investigation, not guessing by serial numbers (Yes, and 15 numbers difference is not small, there could be different batches.)
In addition to the harshness of a conflict in which "everyone acts in an inhuman way with civilians involved", this elite shooter from Madrid has been surprised by the presence in kyiv of so many private security agencies. “I have not seen armed civilian militias here. What there are here are military companies from many countries, including Ukraine. A commander interviews you, they get to know you, they take pictures of you. Analyze all that you are and where you have been. They are Poles, Swedes, Danes and, above all, Americans. They put together teams of six people and, if you are the missing card in the deck, they hire you. I understand that Zelensky's number four is the one in charge of coordinating operations with the commanders, who are mostly Americans. They are the ones who move the roost ».
«You don't arrive, they give you a weapon and you start shooting. It's false. You have to have contacts with someone from the Army base. If you don't speak English, for example, they take you directly to the border. The Foreign Legion that I have seen is in Yavoriv, on the border with Poland. They do not have weapons, nor do they wear uniforms. If they arrive in military clothing, they provide them with another. What they are doing is learning Ukrainian so they can communicate with the population if they attack that area. They are like a humanitarian aid made up of ex-soldiers from many countries.”
He does not want to say the name of his employer, nor the salary that is paid into a Ukrainian account every fifteen days. He specifies that the figure depends greatly on the qualification and the task, «a paramedic is not paid the same as a sniper. Or to a drone pilot than to a scavenger or an artificer ». Then there are the “pluses”. "In my case, it's $300 per man killed."
The next mission for which they have just hired him will be a “black op”, an operation without a flag that he will carry out together with three colleagues with a US command. If they are caught, no one will take notice. “It is a mission that is done under the radar. Let's just say that, officially, it doesn't exist. I still don't know when it will take place."
He is sure that massacres like Bucha's are the work of Chechen mercenaries: «I have seen the occasional corpse left behind by the troops, but I can assure you that it is not the Russians. They are the Chechens, an elite group working for Moscow. It's scary even to see them physically. Russian soldiers are children, they do not have that evil or that level of violence and cruelty. Most are doing military service. I can tell you that they have knelt in front of me, asking me to please not shoot them, crying. A soldier crying. The Russians have not done that.
Point-U in Berdyansk, what I meant about the tail part, if you look closely, you can see its rotation. Sometimes the engine compartment ends up in the impact circle, sometimes it flies off in a completely different directionFor the direction of strike, I can't speak to it. Like I said, if the location of tail part falling is indicative that suggests a launch direction. If not, then not. I was hoping someone with more knowledge on SRBMs might be on here and can jump in.
Also with regard to serial numbers and documentation of the USSR, without this information will not be able to determine accurately. The difference in the series is significant, okey when it differs by 1. Here's an example in the city Snejnyi 2014 . Serial number ВГ 910840Tail fragment location and serial numbers is about all we have to go on at this time.
You don't really think these fighters will agree to run Eastern Ukraine for Russia? Or that Russia, after demonizing Azov, would be able to put them in charge? I'm sure there's a deal to be made, but the deal will probably be more of their lives in exchange for surrender. During the '14-'15 campaign rebel forces made a practice of executing captured right wing volunteer fighters from units like Aydar, Azov, Right Sector. I suspect this is still the case.Statement of the AZOV deputy commander in Mariupol
It looks like they start to realise they have been left to die heroically there. I wouldn't be surprised if Russians would make a cynical offer in exchange for a clean surrender. After all, they would need someone to run Eastern Ukraine should Russia succeed in capturing larger areas than they could manage.
I don't know, most of them seem young and idealistic, after going through what they are going through now they will come out 20 years older, psychologically speaking. I also think most of them are not nazis in the real meaning of the word despite the Russians portraying them as such, but rather nationalists. Maybe only a minority - those coming from Right Sector and other fringe nazi organisations existing prior to 2014 are indeed nazis. But those who joined from 2014 onwards are probably mainly nationalists, patriots and such. I also understood from various sources that many in Azov are from Eastern Ukraine and Russian speaking. I wouldn't exclude that some of them would seek a different meaning and purpose after captivity, there are parallels in history, especially if they are left with a feeling of betrayal and abandonment from the current leadership in Kiev and if they will be treated humanely as PoW's.You don't really think these fighters will agree to run Eastern Ukraine for Russia? Or that Russia, after demonizing Azov, would be able to put them in charge? I'm sure there's a deal to be made, but the deal will probably be more of their lives in exchange for surrender. During the '14-'15 campaign rebel forces made a practice of executing captured right wing volunteer fighters from units like Aydar, Azov, Right Sector. I suspect this is still the case.
It isn't the state flag of the USSR.Russian BTR-80s rolling around somewhere inside Russia, carrying a Russian flag and a Soviet flag. Russian military use of Soviet flags in this conflict is interesting. It highlights the attempts to play on Soviet nostalgia and reference to a shared past, while being utterly devoid of the meaning it originally carried.
Those guys are doomed. Such is the fate of useful idiots who get too big for their britches. The speech may inspire Rhett Butler types to join up, though. ("Maybe it's because I've always had a weakness for lost causes once they're really lost. Or maybe... Maybe I'm ashamed of myself. Who knows?")Statement of the AZOV deputy commander in Mariupol
It looks like they start to realise they have been left to die heroically there. I wouldn't be surprised if Russians would make a cynical offer in exchange for a clean surrender. After all, they would need someone to run Eastern Ukraine should Russia succeed in capturing larger areas than they could manage.
It says the UA lost 398 UAVS. Did they have that many? This figure is surely including all the imrpovised quad copters, because there is no way UA had that many TB-2s or other similar large sophisticated UAVs.---
And now for something completely different. This is five days old now, but I had not seen it before. Not sure what to make of it.
Mod edit: Link with obviously wrong data on the war in Ukraine deleted — any future posts by new members or illogical partisan supporters of either side, that uses deliberately wrong data will result in a 7 day ban. No need to promote just any idiotic institute who uses unpaid, untrained interns to gather garbage-in, garbage-out, data.
For all I know, they're counting every remote-controlled toy helicopter every kid got for Christmas and crashed. I was surprised to see this posted by this source, as CNN and CNBC are very much pro-Ukraine and you'd think from some of their segments the Ukrainians have beaten the Russians back to the border. It's all a puzzle to me, so I posted here for you professionals to have a go at.It says the UA lost 398 UAVS. Did they have that many? This figure is surely including all the imrpovised quad copters, because there is no way UA had that many TB-2s or other similar large sophisticated UAVs.
My first thought which immediately came to mind is GiGo. Absent further or additional information, the numbers listed are IMO rather meaningless since we cannot tell whether or not any or all of them are accurate, and the list of information sources has two which are immediately suspect.And now for something completely different. This is five days old now, but I had not seen it before. Not sure what to make of it.
Mod edit: Link with obviously wrong data on the war in Ukraine deleted — any future posts by new members or illogical partisan supporters of either side, that uses deliberately wrong data will result in a 7 day ban. No need to promote just any idiotic institute who uses unpaid, untrained interns to gather garbage-in, garbage-out, data.
Some of the numbers for total kit on the Ukrainian side are less than reliable too. 2000+ tanks of which 1900+ have been lost? I suspect they took figures off of something like Military Balance, subtracted claimed kills by both sides, and published the results. I would ignore lists like this.My first thought which immediately came to mind is GiGo. Absent further or additional information, the numbers listed are IMO rather meaningless since we cannot tell whether or not any or all of them are accurate, and the list of information sources has two which are immediately suspect.
Further, when one looks at the pre-conflict vs. current losses for Ukraine, the chart does show that two categories have losses significantly in excess of the pre-conflict inventory. While it might be possible that Ukraine were able to add/replace lost inventory during the conflict, the numbers listed make me question the accuracy of the data, i.e. the pre-conflict inventory was wrong/lower than actually the case, and/or the claimed number losses might be higher than actually the case.
As for the pre-conflict numbers listed for the Russians, I strongly suspect that those numbers listed include all kit which Russia and before that the Soviet Union had brought into inventory, including tanks, APC's and IFV's which have essentially been parked and mothballed. This is important because a tank which has been parked, mothballed and put into reserves is not a tank which is immediately available for issue as a replacement for a damaged or destroyed tank. In effect, if the Russian list includes vehicles which have been put into reserve then the list makes it appear as though Russia has a significantly greater number of vehicles and systems which are combat ready. Related to that, it also makes me wonder whether or not the kit list for Ukraine includes kit parked in reserve. If not, then the list is comparing dissimilar data which is already questionable.
Lastly, the last two sources mentioned are the Ukraine and Russian MoD. I would not trust anything from either source without independent verification, and without some sort of list of who provided what set of data, the entire set of data would need to be verified.