GermanHerman
Active Member
Georges Malbrunot of Le Figaro cites a french intelligence source claiming that british SAS as well as US Delta Forces are active in ukraine since the first day of the war. Same source claims russia is aware of this.
@Feanor hello, can you please tell why in your bulletins 95% of the channels are strictly pro-Russian telegrams? To read it that way, only Ukrainian equipment is destroyed.
(this is not a complaint).
Regarding the investigation of the strike on Kramatorsk by serial numbers - schizophrenia, which is spreading in Z groups. ( at first they appealed to what direction the tail part fell from, but from the video from Berdyansk it became clear that the tail part is significantly twisted and it is impossible to determine the direction of impact. Now the serial numbers are taken)
Moreover, these missiles and all the serial numbers were manufactured by the Soviet Union at the Bryansk factory, and if the AFU had them, then Moscow should certainly have Soviet documents that they were transferred to the Ukrainian armament back during the Soviet era. But there is no such information. Strange again, isn't it?
There was also a launch from Russian-controlled Shakhtarsk. Everything was blamed on the work of the air defense, but again, this is a sofa opinion, where is the official investigation?
There was an explosion in Kramatorsk right after the work of the air defense system, again, strange.
The Russian Defense Ministry also points to the southwest direction of the arrival, claiming that the launch came from Ukraine-controlled Dobropillya. However, there are positions of Russian and "separatist" forces in the south-south-west direction (for example, south of Ugledar and near Velyka Novoselka) within the range of the Tochka-U missile (120 km), which means that the launch could well have taken place from there.
I also do not deny that it could have been Ukrainian-controlled forces, because a couple of days earlier, Zelensky had authorized the use of such systems for the territorial defense of Ukraine. Therefore, they could have easily used them on civilians due to inexperience or on other purpose. It should be a normal investigation, not guessing by serial numbers (Yes, and 15 numbers difference is not small, there could be different batches.)
In addition to the harshness of a conflict in which "everyone acts in an inhuman way with civilians involved", this elite shooter from Madrid has been surprised by the presence in kyiv of so many private security agencies. “I have not seen armed civilian militias here. What there are here are military companies from many countries, including Ukraine. A commander interviews you, they get to know you, they take pictures of you. Analyze all that you are and where you have been. They are Poles, Swedes, Danes and, above all, Americans. They put together teams of six people and, if you are the missing card in the deck, they hire you. I understand that Zelensky's number four is the one in charge of coordinating operations with the commanders, who are mostly Americans. They are the ones who move the roost ».
«You don't arrive, they give you a weapon and you start shooting. It's false. You have to have contacts with someone from the Army base. If you don't speak English, for example, they take you directly to the border. The Foreign Legion that I have seen is in Yavoriv, on the border with Poland. They do not have weapons, nor do they wear uniforms. If they arrive in military clothing, they provide them with another. What they are doing is learning Ukrainian so they can communicate with the population if they attack that area. They are like a humanitarian aid made up of ex-soldiers from many countries.”
He does not want to say the name of his employer, nor the salary that is paid into a Ukrainian account every fifteen days. He specifies that the figure depends greatly on the qualification and the task, «a paramedic is not paid the same as a sniper. Or to a drone pilot than to a scavenger or an artificer ». Then there are the “pluses”. "In my case, it's $300 per man killed."
The next mission for which they have just hired him will be a “black op”, an operation without a flag that he will carry out together with three colleagues with a US command. If they are caught, no one will take notice. “It is a mission that is done under the radar. Let's just say that, officially, it doesn't exist. I still don't know when it will take place."
He is sure that massacres like Bucha's are the work of Chechen mercenaries: «I have seen the occasional corpse left behind by the troops, but I can assure you that it is not the Russians. They are the Chechens, an elite group working for Moscow. It's scary even to see them physically. Russian soldiers are children, they do not have that evil or that level of violence and cruelty. Most are doing military service. I can tell you that they have knelt in front of me, asking me to please not shoot them, crying. A soldier crying. The Russians have not done that.
Point-U in Berdyansk, what I meant about the tail part, if you look closely, you can see its rotation. Sometimes the engine compartment ends up in the impact circle, sometimes it flies off in a completely different directionFor the direction of strike, I can't speak to it. Like I said, if the location of tail part falling is indicative that suggests a launch direction. If not, then not. I was hoping someone with more knowledge on SRBMs might be on here and can jump in.
Also with regard to serial numbers and documentation of the USSR, without this information will not be able to determine accurately. The difference in the series is significant, okey when it differs by 1. Here's an example in the city Snejnyi 2014 . Serial number ВГ 910840Tail fragment location and serial numbers is about all we have to go on at this time.
Statement of the AZOV deputy commander in Mariupol
It looks like they start to realise they have been left to die heroically there. I wouldn't be surprised if Russians would make a cynical offer in exchange for a clean surrender. After all, they would need someone to run Eastern Ukraine should Russia succeed in capturing larger areas than they could manage.
You don't really think these fighters will agree to run Eastern Ukraine for Russia? Or that Russia, after demonizing Azov, would be able to put them in charge? I'm sure there's a deal to be made, but the deal will probably be more of their lives in exchange for surrender. During the '14-'15 campaign rebel forces made a practice of executing captured right wing volunteer fighters from units like Aydar, Azov, Right Sector. I suspect this is still the case.
It isn't the state flag of the USSR.Russian BTR-80s rolling around somewhere inside Russia, carrying a Russian flag and a Soviet flag. Russian military use of Soviet flags in this conflict is interesting. It highlights the attempts to play on Soviet nostalgia and reference to a shared past, while being utterly devoid of the meaning it originally carried.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Those guys are doomed. Such is the fate of useful idiots who get too big for their britches. The speech may inspire Rhett Butler types to join up, though. ("Maybe it's because I've always had a weakness for lost causes once they're really lost. Or maybe... Maybe I'm ashamed of myself. Who knows?")Statement of the AZOV deputy commander in Mariupol
It looks like they start to realise they have been left to die heroically there. I wouldn't be surprised if Russians would make a cynical offer in exchange for a clean surrender. After all, they would need someone to run Eastern Ukraine should Russia succeed in capturing larger areas than they could manage.
---
And now for something completely different. This is five days old now, but I had not seen it before. Not sure what to make of it.
Mod edit: Link with obviously wrong data on the war in Ukraine deleted — any future posts by new members or illogical partisan supporters of either side, that uses deliberately wrong data will result in a 7 day ban. No need to promote just any idiotic institute who uses unpaid, untrained interns to gather garbage-in, garbage-out, data.
For all I know, they're counting every remote-controlled toy helicopter every kid got for Christmas and crashed. I was surprised to see this posted by this source, as CNN and CNBC are very much pro-Ukraine and you'd think from some of their segments the Ukrainians have beaten the Russians back to the border. It's all a puzzle to me, so I posted here for you professionals to have a go at.It says the UA lost 398 UAVS. Did they have that many? This figure is surely including all the imrpovised quad copters, because there is no way UA had that many TB-2s or other similar large sophisticated UAVs.
And now for something completely different. This is five days old now, but I had not seen it before. Not sure what to make of it.
Mod edit: Link with obviously wrong data on the war in Ukraine deleted — any future posts by new members or illogical partisan supporters of either side, that uses deliberately wrong data will result in a 7 day ban. No need to promote just any idiotic institute who uses unpaid, untrained interns to gather garbage-in, garbage-out, data.
My first thought which immediately came to mind is GiGo. Absent further or additional information, the numbers listed are IMO rather meaningless since we cannot tell whether or not any or all of them are accurate, and the list of information sources has two which are immediately suspect.
Further, when one looks at the pre-conflict vs. current losses for Ukraine, the chart does show that two categories have losses significantly in excess of the pre-conflict inventory. While it might be possible that Ukraine were able to add/replace lost inventory during the conflict, the numbers listed make me question the accuracy of the data, i.e. the pre-conflict inventory was wrong/lower than actually the case, and/or the claimed number losses might be higher than actually the case.
As for the pre-conflict numbers listed for the Russians, I strongly suspect that those numbers listed include all kit which Russia and before that the Soviet Union had brought into inventory, including tanks, APC's and IFV's which have essentially been parked and mothballed. This is important because a tank which has been parked, mothballed and put into reserves is not a tank which is immediately available for issue as a replacement for a damaged or destroyed tank. In effect, if the Russian list includes vehicles which have been put into reserve then the list makes it appear as though Russia has a significantly greater number of vehicles and systems which are combat ready. Related to that, it also makes me wonder whether or not the kit list for Ukraine includes kit parked in reserve. If not, then the list is comparing dissimilar data which is already questionable.
Lastly, the last two sources mentioned are the Ukraine and Russian MoD. I would not trust anything from either source without independent verification, and without some sort of list of who provided what set of data, the entire set of data would need to be verified.