T-98 vs Arjun

Status
Not open for further replies.

pezfez

New Member
RealIndian said:
Arjun & Type-98 are not same class. Type-98 is compare able with Tank-EX. While Arjun is in the same class of M1A2 SEP, Leopard2EX, Markava mk-IV. :mrgreen
omg, that and the al-zarrar is also in the class of m1a2sep, lep2ex, etc, and where is the tankx in the first place? i can claim ne thing i want too, it doesn't take much
 

RealIndian

New Member
[Admin edit: http://defencetalk.com/forums/rules.php Read the rules, no PERSONAL insults.]

-Engine problem
-Armour strength does not match requirement
-Main gun did not meet performance standard
-High cost
-More than 60% imported parts
All the problems solved. It entered for production & by 2007 IA will induct 127 Arjun mk-II.

So tell me, why would India develop Arjun MK2 if the original Arjun is already in the class of M1A2, Merkava MK4, and Leopard 2EX??
I was saying about Arjun. And only Arjun . no Arjun derivative mentioned by DRDO.
 

RealIndian

New Member
pezfez said:
RealIndian said:
Arjun & Type-98 are not same class. Type-98 is compare able with Tank-EX. While Arjun is in the same class of M1A2 SEP, Leopard2EX, Markava mk-IV. :mrgreen
omg, that and the al-zarrar is also in the class of m1a2sep, lep2ex, etc, and where is the tankx in the first place? i can claim ne thing i want too, it doesn't take much
You can say this. I am not surprised. :smokingc:

BTW Here are some capabilities of Arjun:


  • http://www.bel-india.com/Website/Products/prod_tankele_stabilizer.jpg

The IGMS is a state of the art Fire Control System jointly developed by BEL and IRDE, for the MBT-Arjun tank, providing high first-round hit probability during day & night in all weather conditions, as well as in all terrain / tank conditions.
System comprises of the following major sub-systems:

GUNNER'S SIGHT

Two Axis Stabilized Head Mirror Unit
Thermal Imager Module
Day sight
Laser Range Finder
System and Fire Control Electronics
Gunner's Control & Display Unit
Commander's Control & Display Unit
Tandem Gun Resolver


Provides Stabilized line of sight for engaging moving targets from moving tank
Reduces engagement time for the crew.
Uses second generation Thermal Imager for Night observation & firing.
Online BITE facility for self diagnostics.
Tank Stabilizer
Tank Stabilizer is an electro-hydraulic system designed to increase efficiency of fire of the gun and co-axial machine gun when tank is on the move. Tank stabilizer provides stabilization and laying of the gun and co-axial machine gun in elevation and in azimuth. The special features of Tank Stabilizer are various modes of operation, viz., automatic mode wherein power controls automatically hold the gun at preset angle, stabilized observation mode wherein gunner observes terrain through the sight with elevation power controls switched OFF, Manual laying mode used to fire from stationary position manually, Commander's target designation mode used when commander gives indication of target to gunner from gun laying, where emergency mode turret traversing is done by drivers toggle switch in case it is neccessary to turn turret to open driver's hatch, setting of the gun to the loading angle.
The different subsystems of the unit are First Distribution Box -the control unit for both elevation and traverse drives, Converter used for converting the voltage of 26 V DC to 3 phase AC having voltage of 40 V, 500 Hz, Frequency Stabilizer maintaining constant output frequency of the converter, Gun Setting Device- an electro-mechanical device used for setting the gun at the loading angle and retaining it at the same angle during loading.


An Electro-hydraulic drive system
Stabilized line of sight in elevation / traverse
Automatic compensation of mismatch between stabilized line of sight and stabilized position of gun in elevation.
Preset loading angle
About Arjun protection

All round protection from anti-tank ammunition is achieved by t~e newly developed KANCHAN armour to a degree much higher than available in present generation tanks. The high degree of immunity is achieved by.
*The computerised design and simulation
*A fabricated turret housing lightweight compact KANCHAN armour
*Careful dimensioning of wall through optimal slopes and angles
*A low silhouette

Cross posting From another Forum



Ok for the guys who have not read much abt Arjun and its capability, I'm putting here some posts made by the Israeli (whom many Indians in here too wud be aware of) who happened to have worked on the Arjun project. I’m posting some of his posts from another forum, so interested ppl can read it and can try to understand that almost all of Arjun’s problem – except the new engine - have been resolved beyond belief of the critics and that many new ‘items’ also have been incorporated into the Arjun which finally made the IA to clear it for the production. But that said personally I’d have loved to see Arjun in a totally different way, but then in its current form its as good as it can get and can FIGHT its way out against the best out there w/o any doubt. So not surprisingly every Indian wud be proud of this achievement as this was the very first step to building an indigenous tank and the hard lessons learnt from this 30 yrs of ‘problem solving’ will indeed put the indigenous tank developers in good stead in designing new, upgrading the existing ones and in collaborating on new projects in the future and that’s truly a achievement that the Arjun team has achieved and Hats off to them for pulling it out!

Let me put some info abt the member that the member himself have posted abt him which is all whats needed as of now –


I have been with Armour & Systems and for 9 years now and developed 2 very critical sub systems for the Merkava from scratch and were regarded as a breakthrough. My father too worked on these tanks and has his share. Anyway thats me.


So thats the person describing himself , now for his posts abt the Arjun developments as he posted with some modification by me in the posts (not to the substance or his original post) -

Quote:
THE BEAST WALKS THE DESERT AGAIN


Loads of development on Arjun...

- Active area defence system tested to user satisfaction...

- 34/37 successful LAHAT..the 2 fail were tuning trials so actually 34/34 100% hits.. weight is reduced by 1.3 tons.

- No engine problems

- No hydraulic screw ups.

- FCS/BMS/Gen2 TI/ MRI-Ti/ Auto scan and request/ IFF system for strike corps implemented in tank and later same will go to t-90's/72's and finally all mobile units in battlefield. So % kill of friendly is reduced.

- Auto track tested but no one interested -including me as ARM2 (special MRI for Arjun CMDR) scans and beeps at mobile objects on battle field is mis match occurs from scanned input to database.

- AC is working fine - but still not that good. some vents directly fall on FCS/BMS (small ac ducts) to keep temperature down for electronics inside there by keeping overall temp down...this is better as a overall AC is not required and avoids too much load on Engine.

- Its coming out to be a TRUE NIGHT BEAST ... 4km hits and kills are at 100% level on the move at night with ARM2 targeting.

- rotating magazine concept will happen in probably MK3 - so that will have to weight...

- RPG-7 OG7v hits just bounce off the Armour even from rear.

- new nano-carbon aerosol lazer jammer perfected

- two modes of seating one leaning. like challenger and other like Ab.M2 upright...upto user to chose.

- Barrel life counter added to BMS

- self check system further upgraded...simple FIRE WIRE link to onboard system to diagnose tank ..no wire anymore.

- mobile arjun maint. kit 100% complete and tested to user satisfaction.

- For the sighting system...modifications being done to avoid lazer blinders.

- NBC system perfected to AB.Mk2 Sep standard. actually they are the same..we did ToT to India.

- Many other little issues addressed. ...most critiques in Armored units very satisfied..

- summer trials we will re-test and we are quite sure it will do well as most systems were lab tested to worse conditions than in Rajasthan

- independant satcom system added for BMS too..

we see arjun as are adopted baby out here turning out to be a excellent machine...for zeeee night. A Indian serial killer out to rape those little al-kh. he he he...

- Integration tests for air support and Arjun battle target share system(TSS) [part of BMS]tested and 100% A-OK...

- LAHAT launch and air support guiding to target tested and OK too.

Fucccckkkk it will kill a merkava at night...OH GOD WHAT HAVE WE CREATED....
BIG PARTY TODAY


and this too from him replying to the Chinese T-98 and Arjun ...

Quote:
Hi buddy,
I am denil - from Israel and working on the Arjun. I think most of you guys are getting too personal here. Facts are facts.
Buddy i think i can help you out here. Most of the answers to your questions are already in this forum.

Anyway i have been to Singapore and spent some time in assisting Singapore with certain critical upgrades and system design issues. Anyway that is not the point here. I DO KNOW THE T-98 quite well seen the interiors too I guess you have too. The entire tanks metallurgy is MESSED UP... even a RPG -7 will kill the t-98 - sorry but its true. I know about Chinese engineers consulting Israel on these issues. There is talk of a huge assistance from Israel to Chine -but USA is a major bottle neck. You are a market to us - but USA wont let it happen even with some really small issues.

Ok so what do you want to know about the Arjun.

a) On the move it sees you in pitch darkness at 6+KM through MRI-TI devices - ID at about 5.3KM and engage you with comfort at 4.7 KM with super high velocity AP shell..much like the CHARM shell -but much better.

b) At day time it will kill you on the move at 5KM. HeSh at almost 7.5KM.
This tank is no joke my dear man. Its super-chromium lined rifled barrel with revolutionary dual discarding APFSDS shell is a killer.

c) It has as per our own experience and knowledge the fastest AP shot on this planet.

d) FCS/BMS/LAHAT at 6+KM (first people on earth to fire ATGM through rifled barrel using Indian tech of dual cassette disposal- i can explain this in detail to you. But i think someone here can take the trouble to explain CONDOMIZING concept) MRI system etc etc... puts it way out of the t-98.


e) Let me honestly tell you what the t-98 is. It is a honest attempt to make a decent tank and experiment (since there is a lot of money in China to do this) and play with technologies and see what comes out. This one has gone WAY TO WRONG...but nevertheless that’s how all nations learn. next time around most of it will be rectified. Its was also made from a marketing point of view to make some form of dent in the Russian arms market in providing cheap alternates.

f) Metallurgy and China have a long way to go. I know of incidents documented secretly by China and given to El-Op systems for study and rectification - i don’t have the liberty to go into that.

g) Ask what you want on Arjun and i think i will be more helpful. Engine problem (as in Import issue just like the problem with our Merkava's) is being jointly addressed by India and Israel and progress is excellent.


The post below was in reply to the amazing muzzle velocity that Arjun achieved with its 120mm rifled gun , the SECRET ammo of the Arjun which was an Indo-Russian joint development which in all sense will see its use in other tanks in the Indian armory and so will it in Russia and their newer Tanks .....

Quote:
Please understand i will be as liberal as i possibly can be. Certain area's i can not go into depth with.

Q) show how arjun achieve the 5km range with the 120 rifle?
It will be great to get some numbers, like different types of rounds:
1) Their mass,
2) muzzle velocity, Yes way above 1800m/s see if you are doing a standard v=1/m thing here - it will hold little water.

The thing is a 11 yr research which has yelded the hyper velocity (Secret) shell. This is the third type of ammo Arjun fires and is Unique in nature. It is a Joint devp by the Russians and Indians. details of this shell are highly classified. We have fired it and seen the results but have never been allowed to study it. Although we have a fair idea. Its a new type of propelent and a lighter shell (metullargy R&D of Russians) that makes it althought light -making it achieve hyper velocity with a special charge with a crystal tungsten tip giving it penetrations close to a DU round and at the same time a velocity way in excess of what most would be aware off.

Listen i am really short of time...so please do me a favour go here:
scrool down to my 4th post...read it. It will help answer a few of your questions.
4) interior pressure, No can tell


And finally the Super Secret Ammo and the Propellant

Quote:
What nationality is the propellant? German, Israeli or Indian?

Russo-Indian: Israel is very keen on getting its hands on it - till now no success. Germans are aware of it and so are the British for the challenger 2E program. They also want to understand crystallization issues India has had a breakthrough with to develop the Green CHARM 3 ammo. They have been regularly sending requests to negotiate. They saw the demo too and were amazed at the penetration levels... its like rams through any armour you throw at it. We even had our new Armour blocks flown here and it had shown excellent results in tests in Israel. But dam it! Would you know it - it was **** all in front of the Arjun...and that was at some 4.0Km. I keep getting ideas all day long how to stop this round.
He seems to se a tank specialist. :smokingc:
 

RealIndian

New Member
DRDO fixed the problems with mobility & engine heating.

• DRDO teamed up with Israeli companies to develop a digital FCS. This FCS was extensively tested by Indian Army & duly accepted.

• Development of new & better optics by BEL.

• The MoD has allocated $3.9 million to build three transporter types to move Arjun.

In addition to this Arjun achieved many goals. Some of them are listed below.


• Chromium lined barrel increases the barrel life & also the muzzle velocity of the shell.

• Arjun’s armor was tested in combat like conditions and fared very well. It also withstood direct fire of APFSDS, HEAT, HESH & various RPG roundsas per the latest trials on September 2003.

• LAHAT ATGM has been test fired from Arjun. This trials were successful.

• Never before seen crew protection levels in tanks used by Indian Army. Crew protection is paramount and slight changes have been made here. The ammo storage is in the turret bustle but is modulated and separated from the crew by armor, so that if hit by RPG or top-attack ATGM, crew remains safe.

• Integrated GPS & BMS (Battlefield Management System). These systems have touch screen for rapid access.

• A new Active Area Defense System (AADS) from Elbit.

• Estimated cost of $ 4 million per piece.

Future of Arjun looks very bright. DRDO is more confident now. Spin-offs from Arjun project have been many. Army has extensively tested a howitzer mounted on Arjun chasis named ‘Bhim’. Another is Arjun turret mounted atop T-72 chasis. It is named Tank-Ex by DRDO (some people also call it Karna).

http://orbat.com/site/weapons/2004/arjun.pdf
 

RealIndian

New Member
Cross posting......

And the reply to the question of wear and tear of the barrel

Quote:
Ok wear and tear: Here is what you are saying

Q: “rifling does increase range and accuracy but actually decreases muzzle velocity. As the grooves on the inside of the barrel "grip" the projectile to spin it, they also slow it down. Not only that it actually wears the barrel down

Ans: This FS-AP you are pointing out is the one with exposed cone. The AP fired from this barrel is a dual stage projectile. The cone is sealed in a condom type rubber around it with 3 burnable line seals. During travel through the barrel it heats up and burns out exposing the main cone on exit – and then separates the sabot jacket. So during travel it is as smooth as a smoothbore with a HIGHER velocity and hence a flatter trajectory, better accuracy and greater penetration. The griping by rifling is thus removed from the concept of FS-AP shots…long rod and otherwise. Also note that the “Greenhill's Rule†is pushed to its limits through research. This is a significant contribution of Arjun 120mm to the MBT’s of the world…if ever the tech is declassified.

and a few more questions and answers based on the range and propellants

Quote:
Q a) How have you managed to do an assessment against CHARM?
Ans: The americans did it...we were there for the assessment.

Q b) I’m curious about the HESH of almost 7.5KM. That’s way beyond LOS and makes engagement necessary through prisms or other targeting devices. At 7.5km, I’m assuming that this is an assisted projectile?

Ans: Can not go there
i will address this part first: 8Km is the entire trajectory of the HeSh round. this is nothing more than a capability demo. In actually situation a gunner wont let off the HeSh round at atleast 5.6Km. But this is a phenominal achv. by itself...even now i agree with you..given the terrain where arjun is to be used (Sand Dunes) engagement will be mostly at 2200m to 3Km max. But then again if we change the terrain this excess range of HeSh effective range of 6+Km is a major Advantage. Mind you this HeSh is not our standard TNT/RDX chemical mix...its the new stuff

and to the question of the barrel wear and tear and also the barrel life ...

Quote:
Q) One of the significant issues with bore liners is wear and tear at higher velocities, and there are significant metallurgical issues between the liner and the core barrel. Are you indicating that bore liners are now less of a mating issue with these barrels?

You are 100% correct: this will reamain a issue with Arjun. aFTER ALL THE INNOVATIONS AND BREAKTHROUGS THE BARREL DOES wearout...but it is not a major cause of worry as the wear and tear is better than anything riffled out there-sorry can not reveal exact detail. But take my work...it is not a issue the cmdr will be too worried about.

And that will tell u guys that the Arjun’s rifled gun is something really really different and the best out there and so do the cmdr need not have to worry abt the barrel life coz as said earlier, the Arjun has got a barrel life counter integrated into its BMS

and abt the engine issue, its said that the 1,500hp engine maybe on its way and that summer mean in the post was this summer that passed , but then i hope it don get into Arjun and rather an indigenious one gets in as that wud help reduce costs greatly
Quote:
Q g) If you are still using Russian or Ukrainian engines then I would have a high degree of doubt as to longevity and MTBF issues.

Its a German 1400 engine...almost got the 1500 one ready for trials...will do that this summer. Its looking good.


and abt the new propellant and the time taken for 'solving the problem' of the Arjun
Quote:
One last thing: the propelant was so powerful that it has during the early days poped the barrel out of the tank and broken the FCS with its vibrations...it took 4 yrs just fixing that issue... gives you some idea is HeSh is assisted.
and some more question and answers... hope u guys wud be intrested in reading this ...

Quote:
Q) Sorry for stepping in, but i'm quite annoyed by people here keep saying a rifled tank gun is better while the fact is a smooth bore is obviously superior

Ans)…and that is why I keep saying that this Arjun rifled gun is a accidental find by Indian Engineer’s.
Lets take this point by point and in the process look at the deeper secret of rifled guns, development/advances in chromium lining […gives increased velocity and therefore penetration power to the round, greater precision and reduced wear on the barrel.which is reduced to negligible amount in the Arjun…will explain below] and a Russian high charge shell specially designed for the 120 of Arjun.{
sorry can’t say much on this due to classification of technology.}

Q1). The gas seal on a rifled round has to be metal-on-metal contact between the round and the barrel this has a high friction co-efficient -limiting acceleration (see chromium lining as mentioned above) of the rifled round.

Ans] Wrong - overcome by advances in chromium lining and here is what’s new- rounds fired through this 120 are specially designed to reduce friction. This is true for FS-AP and the high power round they developed with the Russians. So rounds fired are a) HesH, b) FS-AP and c) special ammo for high range high impact tank busting (more like a SPIN stabilized round)

Q) On a fin-stabilized round the gas seal can be plastic etc (any suitable low friction material). There are no edges inside the barrel to inhibit acceleration (rifling). So more energy is expended accelerating the round.

Ans] Ok 100% correct (you are saying: “rifling does increase range and accuracy but actually decreases muzzle velocity. As the grooves on the inside of the barrel "grip" the projectile to spin it, they also slow it down) - not valid though. This FS-AP you are pointing out is the one with exposed cone. The AP fired from this barrel is a dual stage projectile. The cone is sealed in a condom type rubber around it with 3 burnable line seals. During travel through the barrel it heats up and burns out exposing the main cone on exit – and then separates the sabot jacket. So during travel it is as smooth as a smoothbore with a HIGHER velocity and hence a flatter trajectory, better accuracy and greater penetration. The griping by rifling is thus removed from the concept of FS-AP shots…long rod and otherwise. Also note that the “Greenhill's Rule†is pushed to its limits through research. This is a significant contribution of Arjun 120mm to the MBT’s of the world…if ever the tech is declassified. Our Israli council is working on tech transfer for the same.

… and that’s the reason I had said in my earlier post the British and even the American’s would be interested in this barrel and tech. Apparently these chaps seem to be better in not just software. Believe me I had my opinions about rifling before I saw what I saw.
The reason I didn’t post was because I did’nt have people with your knowledge to share it with.

Q2). The ability to fire a differnt types of ammunitions. This includes missiles and long rod penetrators. (long rod penetrators are long rod like ammunition designed to punch through armour like a "dart". This type of ammunition cannot be spin stablised because the spinning will break the long projectile)

Ans) Missiles are not required by long range powerful guns. Are you saying rifled barrels don’t fire long rods??? Because the do, what do you think the CHARM ammo is! The AP for Arjun is long-rod type. Yes correct spin will break the long rod projectile….again chromium lining and condom’sing the cone was the answer. The spin is actually reduced to extremely slow spin to a point of being negligible …not like a bullet. But note that the Arjun 120mm barrel is one of the most expensive parts of the tank.

Q3). While a rifled helps to stabilise the shell by spinning, it does subject the round to precession. This means the point tends to wander in a small circle. This is less than desirable when you want to punch a hole through armour by brute force.

Ans) same as point 2. Though you are conventionally correct.

Q4). Less wear and tear for smooth bores

While a shell from a rifled gun is marginally more stable over long ranges, this is nothing when compared to the importance of the Fire Control System. With a good FCS, the effect of wind speed and such can be compensated so a fin stablised round can be just as accurate as a spin stablised round.
When we talk about range for tank gun, we talk about the maximum range that the shell can still penetrate enemy armour. In this aspect, a smooth bore gun has better effective range.

Ans) I think these are answered by reading above. Also the “EFFECTIVE†range is of Smooth bore is challenged by rifled hyper velocity long rods which don’t compromise on muzzle velocity and thereby give long effective range.

Q5)Just look at the most modern MBTs in the world, everyone of them saves our own challenger is using a smooth bore gun. Plus our army is talking about switching to smooth bore guns for the challenger 2'sreplacement.

Ans) Correct. The reason why this is a so is due to R&D into various forms of ammo and the diversity achieved in ammo’s and standardization to NATO and cheaper production costs of conventional shells. This is not possible via Rifled guns. The Arjun is designed for this continent with specific objectives and the 3 type ammunition variety more than meet the required demand of the Indian Army. The ground displacement is good, mobility, sensors, crew comfort and ease of driving Superior firepower - to destroy targets (tank/bunker’s) and very good Armour protection.

I would also like to add that Arjun had its 120mm barrel pop out during trials of the Russian high charge ammo about 2 years ago – as told to m
e.

P.S: With developments like the german L55 and DM 53 developments maybe Rifling will have to be droped and smooth bore re-adopted. I guess when R&D started with the Indian's the rifled looked more promising....lets see, time will tell


And this post talks abt the Arjun’s BMS and also of a future version (Mk2 or Mk3?) of Arjun with semi-automatic magazine …..
Quote:
Hi bro's,
I had mentioned the CONDOMISING of rounds on page 1 of this topic...actually i was discussing AP rounds specifically...similar system for LAHAT was adopted here in India and all went fine after 2 tests, the 3rd being made public . This tech of condomizing is 100% Indian. I think you guys are heavily into sex..like writing kamasutra and implementing sexual idea's into tank guns Anyway yes we can say its a Indian-LAHAT. the trix was already there and implemented on this ATGM. Did you know that once lahat is fired from tank A...it can still be guided by Tank B to its target. It is a lang range ATGM. As part of the Arjun BMS system between the tank and other elements on the battlefield - data such as enemy location, target designation can be exchanged with other tanks, or helicopters, artillery, etc., allowing better situation awareness. Moreover, for example a guided LAHAT missile fired by one tank can be guided to its target by another.
Now the idea is to have a MERKAVA type electrical semi-automatic revolving magazine for 10 rounds on standby and the loader coming into action after depletion of these 10. It also increases its ammo capacity.


Yes Arjun fires Long rod TYPE ammo. not a photocopy of CHARM DU type but slightly smaller with a heavy charge...it used to break the targeting sights of Arjun due to the vibration...it was solved though. Isreal is studing the 10 round issue.


The spinoff from 30 yrs of Arjun 'problem solving' also has got itself into the infantry too with the A-7 rifle aka the AK-47 clone to have a good rifled barrel, and so definetely this too wud be the case with the INSAS Rifle and which cud in short mean that India will/has the best rifle ... what do u guys think?

Quote:
Although this may be off topic but i just wanted to tell you that India has a very advanced form of chromium lining tech. this is now being put in all forms of rifling....EVEN THE NEW A-7 ak 47 look alike, result is the penetration power and accuracy of this little toy is astounding... spin off of ARJUN MG to small arms.

-----------------

e] BMS of Arjun is a photocopy of M1A2 BMS + has some stuff from MERKAVA 4 spin off's. If you looked inside - the gadgetry would look better than a Leclerc. Sophisticated touch screen's and all with Gen 2 TI and NOW MRI devices same as MERKAVA Mk4. It will also house the ACTIVE AREA DEFENCE SYSTEM developed by Israel. Has been tested for the same.
Note: Kindly no more discussion on KA-50. You will know when it happens
 

RealIndian

New Member
ON THE DRDO SITE publications

ARJUN gunnery Simulator :

http://www.drdo.com/pub/nl/novdec2003/development.htm






Combat Vehicles Research & Development Establishment (CVRDE), Avadi, has initiated the development of simulators for MBT Arjun gunners under the project Gunnery Arjun Part Task Training Simulator (GAPTTS). Mass production of MBT Arjun is in progress and the users need training to use this state-of-the-art battle tank effectively and efficiently. The simulators will impart cost-effective, exhaustive and extensive training.

In this novel training methodology, training will be in steps of increasing content and complexity instead of having a single simulator which traditionally many other leading tanks in the world have. It will provide training in three stages:
. Classroom Gunnery Training Simulator (CGTS-Agastya)-A software-based version with soft panels for gunnery controls is aimed at teaching the functionalities of the various controls and switches present in the gunner station to a group of gunners in a classroom. It also includes bilingual (Hindi/English) online help for the gunners to independently learn the tank gunnery operations with the help of a simple mouse click.

• Desktop Gunnery Training Simulator (DGTS-Agastya)- This aims at imparting hands-on experience to the gunners with replicated gunner station hardware. The procedural operation on the Integrated Fire Control System (IFCS) is taught. CVRDE in association with CASSA, Bangalore, has developed these two versions of training simulators.

• Gunnery Training Simulator (GTS)- A full-fledged high fidelity simulator provides with advanced procedural, laying, tracking and firing skills to the gunner. This containerised, air-conditioned simulator systems has separate compartments for the instructor and gunner. The gunner has all the vital gunners' equipment positioned in the exact place as in the tank. This simulator has gunner seat vibration unit to simulate the realistic disturbances felt by the gunner during the operation. Specially developed piping optics integrated with gunner's day and thermal eyepieces provides the same field of view of the battlefield environment as in the actual tank. The instructor with his dedicated console can plan, conduct, monitor the exercises and evaluate the trainees based on their performance.

The GTS has been developed in a record period of 15 months in association with M/s Macmet India Ltd., Bangalore and two such systems are commissioned at CVRDE. Lt Gen Tej Paul, the then CC R&D (R), inaugurated the GTS unit at CVRDE. The user training on these simulators was carried out for the batch of gunners from 43 AR. Their feedbacks were received and incorporated in the simulator.




******************
Advanced Automotive Electrical System for MBT Arjun :

(under development pics)




The Combat Vehicles Research & Development Establishment (CVRDE), Avadi, has developed Advanced Automotive Electrical System (AAES) for MBT Arjun. It is a state-of-the-art technology development programme with a processor-based control for the complete hull electrical system, MIL STD 1553B bus, touch screen display, data logging, and BITE capabilities. The system gives emphasis on optimum performance with better man-machine interface. With the use of this system, the crew will experience reduced fatigue levels and can concentrate on their primary role in a battlefield.

The system consists of Pentium processor-based dual controllers, viz., the hull controller with remote terminal units at engine and driver stations. It also includes driver's instrumental panel with electro- luminescent touch screen display, master relay box, etc. The engine's and driver's remote terminal units are identical. In case the active controller fails, the stand-by controller handles processing along with data communication without affecting its performance. Both the hull and the display controller remote terminal units control the function of the engine, automatic transmission, ancillary motors. fans, lamps and integrated fuel level monitoring of all the tanks, including the nose fuel tank.



***************


Laser Homing Anti-Tank (LAHAT) Missile for MBT Arjun

Combat Vehicles Research & Development Establishment (CVRDE), Avadi, in collaboration with a firm has developed a Laser Homing Anti-Tank (LAHAT) Missile for firing from the 120 mm rifled gun of MBT Arjun. LAHAT is a semi-active laser homing missile, which can be fired from the main gun of the tank similar to conventional rounds. The missile would significantly enhance the fighting capability of MBT Arjun since its maximum effective range is 6 km as compared to the 2.5 km of conventional ammunition. The missile can be fired either in a lofted trajectory against AFVs or in a flat trajectory against helicopters. The fire control system of the tank would include a laser designator, which will project a coded laser beam on the target. Target designation can also be done by another tank or ground laser designator.

As an intermediate stage towards the firing demonstration, some LAHAT Missiles were fired from the main gun of MBT to confirm the missile launch parameters such as sabot separation, fin deployment, etc. The penetration capability of the missile warhead was tested and the results confirmed to the requirement.

The missiles used for the firing demonstration were fitted with telemetry transmitter in place of warhead. Mobile telemetry station, generator vehicle, special target fixture and other equipment were developed for the programme. The firing results and telemetry data analysis revealed a high accuracy and repeatability of the performance.

http://www.drdo.com/pub/nl/may2004/newdev.htm
 

RealIndian

New Member
Here is the Arjun transmission control unit (i.e. the gear shifter). Its an all electronic transmission system... Some details from DRDO:



Code:
This is a heavy duty, high power transmission-cum-steering system. This hard-wired semi-automatic transmission controller developed to control the above transmission, caters for manual mode of operation. In manual mode, gear- selection is left to the driver from 1st to 4th gear. The electronic control box receives control commands from the gear selection unit. After processing these commands, control logic signals are sent to actuate solenoid valve to shift gears or inhibit certain actions. Gear selector unit and transmission junction box have been developed and integrated in the indigenous transmission vehicle. Field trials compiling 1200 km have been successfully completed.
The main features of the transmission controller are: 

Four forward and two reverse speed operation selection 

Lock-up converter operation for smooth gear shift during change of gears by disengaging the converter solenoid for a minimum period of 600 ms 

Lock-up solenoid operation by engaging first and third gear simultaneously 

Direction lever-lock at engine speed exceeding safety limit and unlock mechanism to prevent accidental direction selection, and 

Safety provision for engaging the gear-solenoid after sensing the control pressure using the pressure switches.
 

pezfez

New Member
the specs r just like ne other tank, just like the t98 or ak. Admin: Unnecessary comments edited out. Control your comments or risk losing your entire post next time!

and the so called tank expert on acig or afm forum is a kid (like me :) ). if he was a tank developer or tank expert he wouldn't spend his time on kiddy forums but working. it doesn't take much to crate a farse like that, just take the best vocab u can find, and the article would be in a defence journal like janes not some copy and paste kiddy site.
 

RealIndian

New Member
pezfez said:
the specs r just like ne other tank, just like the t98 or ak. Admin: Unnecessary comments edited out. Control your comments or risk losing your entire post next time!

and the so called tank expert on acig or afm forum is a kid (like me :) ). if he was a tank developer or tank expert he wouldn't spend his time on kiddy forums but working. it doesn't take much to crate a farse like that, just take the best vocab u can find, and the article would be in a defence journal like janes not some copy and paste kiddy site.

Can you give some specs about from a govt site? LOL.
 

doggychow14

New Member
i'm new to this forum. i have to say holy poopy, lots of patriotic people here. janes defence says the t-98 will be the best in the world when fielded.
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 20:43 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jane's Defense Weekly, a respected Britain-based military journal, said the People's Liberation Army is set to deploy a new main battle tank, or MBT, that, when fielded, will become the most powerful of its kind in the world.

The Type-98 nonetheless demonstrates that the PLA is capable of producing a world-class MBT.

Status: T-98 already in service, T-98Gai(Improved version) in production. PLA are also producing T-99. T-2000 in design.


PLA T-98 Main Battle Tank Specifictions:

Weight: 51 tons
Engine: 1,200hp diesel
Power to weight ratio: 23.5hp/ ton
SPEED: 60 km/h
RANGE: 450km
Armor: Frontal arc of turret in RHA: KE Round, 700mm, T-98Gai, 830mm; CE Rnd: 800mm, T-98Gai, 1060mm
Armament:
MAIN GUN: 125mm smoothbore cannon/missile launcher, 41 rnds; PENETRATION: KE, 800mm; 960mm reported w/ new DU rnd, CE, 680mm est; 9M119 REFLEKS (AT-11 Sniper) gun-launched laser-guided anti-tank missiles, 5km range; 1 x 12.7 mm MG


M1A2 Specifications:

Weight 69.54 tons
Propulsion Gas turbine engine, 1500 horsepower
Power-to-weight ratio 21.6 hp/ton
Performance
Maximum governed speed 42 m.p.h.
Speed cross country 30 m.p.h.
Range 265 miles cruising
Main armament 120 mm smooth bore cannon, M256
Coaxial Weapon 7.62 mm machine gun, M240
Loader's Weapon 7.62 mm machine gun, M240, on Skate mount

and it seems the chinese seems to be developing the t-99 and t-2000. wonder where they get the money? problly from all the money US companies r pouring into china
 

Pathfinder-X

Tribal Warlord
Verified Defense Pro
doggychow14 said:
i'm new to this forum. i have to say holy poopy, lots of patriotic people here. janes defence says the t-98 will be the best in the world when fielded.
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 20:43 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jane's Defense Weekly, a respected Britain-based military journal, said the People's Liberation Army is set to deploy a new main battle tank, or MBT, that, when fielded, will become the most powerful of its kind in the world.

The Type-98 nonetheless demonstrates that the PLA is capable of producing a world-class MBT.

Status: T-98 already in service, T-98Gai(Improved version) in production. PLA are also producing T-99. T-2000 in design.


PLA T-98 Main Battle Tank Specifictions:

Weight: 51 tons
Engine: 1,200hp diesel
Power to weight ratio: 23.5hp/ ton
SPEED: 60 km/h
RANGE: 450km
Armor: Frontal arc of turret in RHA: KE Round, 700mm, T-98Gai, 830mm; CE Rnd: 800mm, T-98Gai, 1060mm
Armament:
MAIN GUN: 125mm smoothbore cannon/missile launcher, 41 rnds; PENETRATION: KE, 800mm; 960mm reported w/ new DU rnd, CE, 680mm est; 9M119 REFLEKS (AT-11 Sniper) gun-launched laser-guided anti-tank missiles, 5km range; 1 x 12.7 mm MG


M1A2 Specifications:

Weight 69.54 tons
Propulsion Gas turbine engine, 1500 horsepower
Power-to-weight ratio 21.6 hp/ton
Performance
Maximum governed speed 42 m.p.h.
Speed cross country 30 m.p.h.
Range 265 miles cruising
Main armament 120 mm smooth bore cannon, M256
Coaxial Weapon 7.62 mm machine gun, M240
Loader's Weapon 7.62 mm machine gun, M240, on Skate mount

and it seems the chinese seems to be developing the t-99 and t-2000. wonder where they get the money? problly from all the money US companies r pouring into china
First it's not T-98, it's Type 98.

Second Type 99 and Type 98 is the same tank, the designation apparently changed after the 1999 parade. So the official designation is Type 99.

Third there is never a plan, for a tank called T-2000. Type 99G is the continued development of Type 99, China does not plan to introduce another new tank for at least another decade.
 

dabrownguy

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #113
I don't want to cause any flames but the Type 98G or ztz-99 what ever are pretty much small soviet style tanks with a 125 mm smoothbore gun. These guns usually loose aim at 2.5 km and that is why the T-90 comparable to the Lecerlc fires ATMissiles for a 3 km range. Type 98 probably did that and upgrades made it easier. If PRC went ahead and up gunned there 125 mm smoothbore to 152 mm like the Russians are trying to do than its going to take 5 years more research and 3 more years to put it on tank. There is some BS going around that the Type 98 variants weighing 60 tons which is very unlikely considering their size and a major change like that would make the crew very uncomfortable. Future variants may weigh 60 tons but that’s a good 5 years away. Just my thought.
This is a comparison of world tanks
Specifications Arjun MK 2 Challenger 2 Leopard 2
Weight 59 tons 62.5 tons 55.15
Length (gun forwards) 10.19 m 11.55m 7.69
Width (over tracks) 3.5m 3.52 3.7
(w/ skirts) 3.85m
Height (w/o 12.7mm AAMG) 2.32m 2.49 2.79
Engine 1400 hp MTU Diesel or 1500 engine 1500-hp Diesel
Transmission Semi-automatic with 4 forward and 2 reverse gears. 1200bhp
Fuel 1610 ltrs
Max Speed 72-70 kph (55 mph) 59 kph 72
Cross Country 40 kph 40 kph 45
Cruising Range 200 km (120 miles) 450km
Ground Pressure . 84 kg/cm square 0.83
Ground Clearance .45m
Slide Slope: 60%
Climbing Gradient 35
Trench 2.43 or 3m
Vertical Obstacle .9m
Ford 1.4m
Main Gun 120 mm stabalized rifled gun. Royal Ordnance 120mm L30 gun 120-mm APFSDS-T
LRF Range 10 km
Sights Thermal 5.5 km
Active and Passive Elta Galix
Crew 4 4 4
 

Pathfinder-X

Tribal Warlord
Verified Defense Pro
dabrownguy said:
I don't want to cause any flames but the Type 98G or ztz-99 what ever are pretty much small soviet style tanks with a 125 mm smoothbore gun. These guns usually loose aim at 2.5 km and that is why the T-90 comparable to the Lecerlc fires ATMissiles for a 3 km range. Type 98 probably did that and upgrades made it easier. If PRC went ahead and up gunned there 125 mm smoothbore to 152 mm like the Russians are trying to do than its going to take 5 years more research and 3 more years to put it on tank. There is some BS going around that the Type 98 variants weighing 60 tons which is very unlikely considering their size and a major change like that would make the crew very uncomfortable. Future variants may weigh 60 tons but that’s a good 5 years away. Just my thought.
This is a comparison of world tanks
Specifications Arjun MK 2 Challenger 2 Leopard 2
Weight 59 tons 62.5 tons 55.15
Length (gun forwards) 10.19 m 11.55m 7.69
Width (over tracks) 3.5m 3.52 3.7
(w/ skirts) 3.85m
Height (w/o 12.7mm AAMG) 2.32m 2.49 2.79
Engine 1400 hp MTU Diesel or 1500 engine 1500-hp Diesel
Transmission Semi-automatic with 4 forward and 2 reverse gears. 1200bhp
Fuel 1610 ltrs
Max Speed 72-70 kph (55 mph) 59 kph 72
Cross Country 40 kph 40 kph 45
Cruising Range 200 km (120 miles) 450km
Ground Pressure . 84 kg/cm square 0.83
Ground Clearance .45m
Slide Slope: 60%
Climbing Gradient 35
Trench 2.43 or 3m
Vertical Obstacle .9m
Ford 1.4m
Main Gun 120 mm stabalized rifled gun. Royal Ordnance 120mm L30 gun 120-mm APFSDS-T
LRF Range 10 km
Sights Thermal 5.5 km
Active and Passive Elta Galix
Crew 4 4 4
Well That is true, at least mostly.

In 1994, Russian demontrated their T-80 MBT to Chinese military leaders and managed to impress them. About a dozen of T-80 MBT was purchase and immediately begun to study them. So today's Type 99 you see now uses the same auto loaders and has similar armour to T-80. The difference is the gun, turret and laser defence system.
 

Libyan

New Member
to yutong chen


Its impossible to say that you can fire 4.6km or 8km with direct fire sabot and heat rounds.


the 125mm soviet/chinese gun has never fired a sabot on target beyond 3km that is why the soviets/russians/ukrainians developed the at-6 s-11 missiles to be fired from the tank gun



the Indian arjun will likely have the same feature as israel makes a 120mm tank fired missile.



edge arjun
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Libyan said:
to yutong chen


Its impossible to say that you can fire 4.6km or 8km with direct fire sabot and heat rounds.


the 125mm soviet/chinese gun has never fired a sabot on target beyond 3km that is why the soviets/russians/ukrainians developed the at-6 s-11 missiles to be fired from the tank gun



the Indian arjun will likely have the same feature as israel makes a 120mm tank fired missile.



edge arjun
Agreed, the whole reason why Russia (and subs China) have looked at GM fired rounds is because the metallurgy in their platforms was not of sufficient quality to match guns such as the 120 NATO's etc.. In fact the L7 will still outshoot russian tanks with more persistent accuracy and flight parameters.

The only tank (with a credible recorded source) to shoot past 5km and kill another tank is the Chally2.

The reason why russia and china went to 125's was because they couldn't match the terminal efficiency of NATO std 120's. They've tried to compensate by using bore fired missiles.

The Israeli use of MG fired missiles is due to a diff tactical requirement - it's NOT to get ranging issues resolved.
 

Pathfinder-X

Tribal Warlord
Verified Defense Pro
Here is a new photo i found for T-99G



And GF, China's 125mm gun is alot different than Russian 125mm one. The 125mm gun's origin was the 120mm anti-tank gun developed almost entirely by China in the late 1970's to mid 1980's. The requirement for the 120mm gun originally was to be able to penetrate T-72BM and T80's armour in the distance of 2km. The 125mm gun mounted on T-99 was improved upon this one.

http://www.sinodefence.com/army/artillery/antitank/120.asp

this article will give you the info you need.
 

Srilankan

New Member
If Arjun is so good why did the Indian Sena reject it? Last I heard the Sena was inducting off the shelf T-90s from Russia...Arjun is nothing but a white elephant with French engine and German seals...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top