Not in this topic area though. Create a new one.dabrownguy said:Lets do that. Leo and Arjun look the same. Why not. I want to compare MKI with F-16 Blc 60.
Link please.doggychow14 said:JANE'S DEFENCE WEEKLY - AUGUST 18, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
China fields enhanced Type 98 main battle tank
CHRISTOPHER F FOSS JDW Land Forces Editor
London
The Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) has fielded a further development of the advanced Type 98 main battle tank (MBT), dubbed the Type 98I (Improved) or Type 99, significantly increasing its battlefield survivability.
The Type 98 MBT was first observed during the major military parade in Beijing in October 1999. Sometimes referred to as the ZTZ-98, the Type 98 was a breakthrough for Chinese MBT tank design in the key areas of armour, mobility and firepower.
It is understood that total production of the Type 98 amounted to less than 100 units and could well have been as low as 60-80 units. Some sources have indicated that The Type 98 has only been fielded with one battalion equipped with 40 vehicles which become operational in 2001.
The Type 99 - also referred to as the Type 98I, Type 98gai and ZTZ-99 - has similar firepower and mobility aspects but has a much improved level of protection over its frontal arc.
The turret front has been changed to an arrowhead design similar to that of the latest German Leopard 2A5 and 2A6 MBT. This provides a significant increase in protection against attack from a variety of anti-armour projectiles.
It has also been confirmed that the Type 98 and Type 99 have thermal sights for the commander and gunner to enable targets to be detected, identified and engaged at much longer ranges.
Roof-mounted stabilised day/ night sights for the commander enables hunter/killer target engagements, in which the target is first located and tracked by the commander and then engaged by the gunner.
The Type 98 MBT was the first MBT in the world to be fielded fitted with a roof-mounted laser dazzle device called the ZM-97 which will neutralise enemy optical devices.
Several years ago it was confirmed that the Type 98 could fire a laser guided projectile from the 125mm smoothbore gun to a maximum range of 5000m. The 125mm smoothbore gun is based on a Russian design and fed by an automatic loader which first loads the projectile and then the combustible charge.
The three standard natures of 125mm separate loading ammunition are APFSDS-T (Armour Piercing Fin Stabilised Discarding Sabot - Tracer), HEAT (High Explosive Anti-Tank) and HE (high explosive). The APFSDS-T projectile has a muzzle velocity of 1,720 m/s and will penetrate 220mm of conventional armour at an angle of 68º at a range of 2000m.
China has also been working on depleted uranium (DU) anti-tank projectiles for some years and these may well have been fielded but are not currently being offered on the export market. The 125mm DU APFSDS-T round would penetrate at least 700mm of conventional steel armour protected by explosive reactive armour.
In addition to fielding the new-generation Type 99, China is also engaged in a major programme to upgrade its existing fleet of older MBTs in the areas of armour and firepower.
In Europe and the US, MBT development has virtually ceased, although some upgrade work is under way. Some NATO countries will phase out MBTs in the future (eg Belgium and Canada) and replace these by wheeled vehicles with little offensive capability.
I'm pretty sure the Chinese would have more advanced armor on their tanks by now, as this is pretty much the most advanced tank their have.gf0012-aust said:But if I was looking at how the T-72's were absolutely pasted by M1A1's and Challengers in Iraq and how the Chechyans pasted them badly in Grozny, then I wouldn't be too keen about sitting in anything that was a repainted and reconfigured T-72."
I know Arjun is one of the most unwanted tank by any country on earth's surface.Srilankan said:I insist that Arjun is the BEST tank in the world. After all it has to be: made by the greatest country on Earth, the brightest people, who are the most technologically advanced people on the planet.
Especially for you, I edited this post. Now refer to top of this postdabrownguy said:This is interesting converstion. I guess so. India wouldn't be useing Arjun's rifled gun if it wasn't high velocity. That must be one of the reasons why Arjun costs 5.6 million eh?
mr berry,srilankan was being sarcastic on india.nothing more.i donot believe he is indian.you could have spared your comments.Originally posted by Srilankan:
I insist that Arjun is the BEST tank in the world. After all it has to be: made by the greatest country on Earth, the brightest people, who are the most technologically advanced people on the planet.
I know Arjun is one of the most unwanted tank by any country on earth's surface.
Regardless of Arjun's performance, the Indian army doesn't want it, not just that its bulkier and heavier than the army would want it to be, but its also one of the world's most expensive tank in the world (but not recognised to be the most advanced) due to the fact that over 50% of this "indigenously" designed tank's component are imports.
Well what about Arjun being too big? Which didn't allow it to be transported by air. And about it being too heavy, so that it can't cross bridges because of many bridge's limit cannot support Arjun within Indian.RealIndian said:[Admin edit: http://defencetalk.com/forums/rules.php Read the rules, no PERSONAL insults.]
All the problems solved. It entered for production & by 2007 IA will induct 127 Arjun mk-II.-Engine problem
-Armour strength does not match requirement
-Main gun did not meet performance standard
-High cost
-More than 60% imported parts
well mr berry,these are engineering problems.they do have solutions.as for road bridges,they dont matter as india transports tanks by rail.as for the rail wagons,customised wagons are ready for operations.and if u are concerned about the bridges at the frontline(wherever that may be)army engineers can look into that.as for transport by air(???)we already can move t-72 in the il-76 and that should meet operational requirements,if any,as of now.anyway,transporting heavy tanks by air is not standard in any army except if they are badly needed in overseas deployments.americans and brits may do that but i dont think their bulk of the armoured force arrives by air.Well what about Arjun being too big? Which didn't allow it to be transported by air. And about it being too heavy, so that it can't cross bridges because of many bridge's limit cannot support Arjun within Indian.
aerodynamic?????? :eek what for?wind resistance is not a trouble with the tanks.they hardly go over 45km an hour on road and far slower,cross country(am not talking of top speeds here).further,tanks aren't to be sleek sports cars.hope you know that.Sounds like that Arjun is ready to go, then good luck.
Not dicrmination or anything, but that Arjun looks like a f---ing box, can't they even try to made it look bit more aerodynamic?
Aerodynamic??????, before posting such crap, plz try google and learn what a tank is and then come and comment on tanks....Mr Expertberry580 said:Sounds like that Arjun is ready to go, then good luck.
Not dicrmination or anything, but that Arjun looks like a [MoD Edited: lets stop using F word in every reply, shall we? ] box, can't they even try to made it look bit more aerodynamic? :?