Russian Navy Discussions and Updates

KiwiRob

Well-Known Member
I was under the impression that the mistral deal is suppose to improve Russia's general shipbuilding capabilities. If that's the case, wouldn't the same investment be better off if they are spent on the civilian sector? You can invite a lot of investments from Korean companies teaching local shipyards on modern shipbuilding methods and project management skills.
There is already a lot of investment by Koreans in Russia, mainly in the Russian Far East, DSME is building a yard, the first vessels to be built here have already been announced. There is also a plan to merge the three St Petersburg yards into one superyard, outside the city, this makes sence considering the land where the existing yards are is prime real estate and would be far more valuable for use as shops offices and expensive residential developments.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Russia to begin building first Project 11356 frigate for Black Sea Fleet on Saturday

RIA Novosti

01:50 18/12/2010

MOSCOW, December 18 (RIA Novosti) - The construction of the first Project 11356 frigate for Russia's Black Sea Fleet will begin at the Yantar Shipyard in the Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad on Saturday, a spokesman for the Russian Navy said.

Yantar won a tender to build three Project 11356 frigates in October. The Black Sea Fleet chief earlier told RIA Novosti the construction would begin in January 2011.

The ship will be named Admiral Grigorovich after Russia's Naval Minister Ivan Grigorovich, who was in office in 1911-1917, the spokesman said.

The frigate, with a displacement of 4,000 tons, will be equipped with a 100-mm gun, a Shtil surface-to-air missile system, two Kashtan air-defense gun/missile systems, two twin 533-mm torpedo launchers, and an anti-submarine warfare helicopter.

The Russian Navy chief, Adm. Vladimir Vysotsky, earlier said one or two Project 11356 frigates will join the Black Sea Fleet every year starting 2013.

Yantar is currently building three Project 11356 frigates for the Indian Navy under a $1.6-billion contract signed in 2007. The first warship, which was floated out last November, will be handed over to India in mid-2011. The two others will be delivered by the end of 2012.

Russia has previously built three Talwar-class frigates for India – INS Talwar (Sword), INS Trishul (Trident), and the INS Tabar (Axe).
 

Wall83

Member
Russia to begin building first Project 11356 frigate for Black Sea Fleet on Saturday

RIA Novosti

01:50 18/12/2010

MOSCOW, December 18 (RIA Novosti) - The construction of the first Project 11356 frigate for Russia's Black Sea Fleet will begin at the Yantar Shipyard in the Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad on Saturday, a spokesman for the Russian Navy said.

Yantar won a tender to build three Project 11356 frigates in October. The Black Sea Fleet chief earlier told RIA Novosti the construction would begin in January 2011.

The ship will be named Admiral Grigorovich after Russia's Naval Minister Ivan Grigorovich, who was in office in 1911-1917, the spokesman said.

The frigate, with a displacement of 4,000 tons, will be equipped with a 100-mm gun, a Shtil surface-to-air missile system, two Kashtan air-defense gun/missile systems, two twin 533-mm torpedo launchers, and an anti-submarine warfare helicopter.

The Russian Navy chief, Adm. Vladimir Vysotsky, earlier said one or two Project 11356 frigates will join the Black Sea Fleet every year starting 2013.

Yantar is currently building three Project 11356 frigates for the Indian Navy under a $1.6-billion contract signed in 2007. The first warship, which was floated out last November, will be handed over to India in mid-2011. The two others will be delivered by the end of 2012.

Russia has previously built three Talwar-class frigates for India – INS Talwar (Sword), INS Trishul (Trident), and the INS Tabar (Axe).
Dont copie whole articles.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Yes in the future if you have a piece of news relevant to the thread, post a one-two line summary along side your own commentary, and a link to the article.
 

Wall83

Member
Looks like a civilian use of the Typhoon class submarines is out of the question.
Two alternatives then remains, rebuild and modification to return to the Russian navy in some sort of role. Or be scrapped.

I do find the later option somewhat unrealistic when the option to sell the units for civilian purpose and earn money on them exists. But then again the option to get them back in to shape for active duty seems far of as well.

Time will tell.

Russian subs won't be refitted for oil and ore transportation – Rubin design bureau
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
THe civilian option just got ruled out because it was deemed too unpractical. The scrap yard is their future.

The VMF will have project 667 around for a while, and the Borei's will replace them in time.
 

Wall83

Member
Russian 30mm canon totaly destroys pirates.

(warning rely rough video)

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KOkMx3LHHo"]YouTube - Cañon 30mm vs Piratas.[/nomedia]
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
I've heard much speculation about this on Russia sites. I don't believe this is a ship with people on it. I'm more inclined to believe the formal explanation that this is a confiscated from the pirates boat being used for target practice.
 

owais.usmani

New Member
^^^oh dear!! they are going to defend Russia with that? :confused: a sub which opens up its hatches with a bang so loud that can be heard across the whole ocean!

........or am I missing something here?? :help
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
^^^oh dear!! they are going to defend Russia with that? :confused: a sub which opens up its hatches with a bang so loud that can be heard across the whole ocean!

........or am I missing something here?? :help
It's a nuclear missile sub. Once the missiles fire it hardly matters.
 

owais.usmani

New Member
It's a nuclear missile sub. Once the missiles fire it hardly matters.
It carries 16 missiles not just one, so as soon as the first hatch opens all the hunter-killers out there are aware of its position, and can sink it with the remaining 15 hatches still locked.

And besides how can you say that it hardly matters? There are close to a hundred sailors on this sub, you mean the russians are planing to send their sailors on a suicide mission?? :confused:
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
It carries 16 missiles not just one, so as soon as the first hatch opens all the hunter-killers out there are aware of its position, and can sink it with the remaining 15 hatches still locked.

And besides how can you say that it hardly matters? There are close to a hundred sailors on this sub, you mean the russians are planing to send their sailors on a suicide mission?? :confused:
Strategic nuclear weapons. It's not like it's going to fire off one missile, and then stop. It's also not like there will be a Russia left after a strategic nuclear exchange.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
It carries 16 missiles not just one, so as soon as the first hatch opens all the hunter-killers out there are aware of its position, and can sink it with the remaining 15 hatches still locked.
Only if they're already in position to fire. There's a lot of sea out there, & unless an SSN has been tracking the SSBN, in which case it's moot, there's little chance of there being one within range.

BTW, have you thought about the noise the missile launch makes?
 

owais.usmani

New Member
Strategic nuclear weapons. It's not like it's going to fire off one missile, and then stop. It's also not like there will be a Russia left after a strategic nuclear exchange.
well, in case of a nuclear exchange with USA, yes I agree with you. But remember that not many countries out there would be able to return a nuclear strike, although they would be able to destroy a noisy SSBN with their SSN, diesel electrics or even an ASW ship, which many countries possess.

Only if they're already in position to fire. There's a lot of sea out there, & unless an SSN has been tracking the SSBN, in which case it's moot, there's little chance of there being one within range.

BTW, have you thought about the noise the missile launch makes?
hmm I don't know buddy, but I still got pretty confused seeing one of the latest SSBNs out there making a bang like that. Although I haven't seen it, I'm pretty sure the much older ohio classes wouldn't be banging like that! :)

They do try to make a SSBN quiet and stealthy in every aspect, don't they? so why left the hatches out?
 

swerve

Super Moderator
...They do try to make a SSBN quiet and stealthy in every aspect, don't they? so why left the hatches out?
Because when you open the hatches you're only a few seconds away from launching missiles, & there's no way you can do that quietly. The noise of the hatches opening is probably insignificant when compared to the noise of a missile launch. So why bother quietening it?

It's like worrying about the noise made by the hammer coming down on a shotgun, without worrying about the loud bang a moment later.
 

owais.usmani

New Member
Because when you open the hatches you're only a few seconds away from launching missiles, & there's no way you can do that quietly. The noise of the hatches opening is probably insignificant when compared to the noise of a missile launch. So why bother quietening it?

It's like worrying about the noise made by the hammer coming down on a shotgun, without worrying about the loud bang a moment later.
hmm well you do have a valid point, but still......................

anyways thanks a lot! :)
 
Top