PAF IN 2015

umair

Peace Enforcer
List of Sub-systems I know of:
1)A datalink(probably French origin)
2)RC-400-4 Radar by THALES
3)Sextant Avionique glass Cockpit
4)Increased % of composites in structure
5)SAGEM navigation and EW suite including internal airborne multiband infrared and ECM active jammers
6)New cockpit outlay with 5 mfds(3 large:eek:ne colored, 2 small showing RWR and fuel flow readings),25 degree fieldof view smart HUD
7)HMD&S system
8)landing gear tyres by Genera Tyre co Pakistan(joking lol) :D
 

Bilal_Khan

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

The most realistic figure would be the PAF spending 12bn USD over the next 12 years modernizing, hence over the long term. By 2016 it's looking to accomplish "minimum deterrance".

This is a much more realistic figure by 2016...
  • 60 Mirage 2000-5 (2.4bn USD)
  • 60 JAS-39C (2.4bn USD)
  • 200 JF-17 (3bn USD)
  • 80 Mirage ROSE II (200mn USD)
  • 20 L-15 (200mn USD)
  • 60 K-8 (100mn USD)
  • 6 SAAB-2000 AWACS (1.2bn USD)
  • 8 E-310 (used) Air-to-Air Refueling Tankers (500mn USD)
  • 4 SAAB-2000 V.I.P (200mn USD)
  • 12 A-400 Medium Lift Transport (700mn USD)
  • 6 CN-235 Light Lift Transport (100mn USD)
 

Roger Smith

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

Bilal_Khan said:
The most realistic figure would be the PAF spending 12bn USD over the next 12 years modernizing, hence over the long term. By 2016 it's looking to accomplish "minimum deterrance".

This is a much more realistic figure by 2016...
  • 60 Mirage 2000-5 (2.4bn USD)
  • 60 JAS-39C (2.4bn USD)
  • 200 JF-17 (3bn USD)
  • 80 Mirage ROSE II (200mn USD)
  • 20 L-15 (200mn USD)
  • 60 K-8 (100mn USD)
  • 6 SAAB-2000 AWACS (1.2bn USD)
  • 8 E-310 (used) Air-to-Air Refueling Tankers (500mn USD)
  • 4 SAAB-2000 V.I.P (200mn USD)
  • 12 A-400 Medium Lift Transport (700mn USD)
  • 6 CN-235 Light Lift Transport (100mn USD)

With 12 years period to go till 2016, you forgot to add the inflaton factor which would be minimum 5 to 8% making almost double the cost and PAF requires $24 billion to purchase the aforementioned hardware and equipments. :?
 

moinanwer

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

Last year in Jang, when JF-17 made it first flight , it was wrriten in a number of articles that if number of prduction units exceed 300, the per unit cost will be 10 million if less than 300 the price will be 15 million. If it is any thing to go by, 150 JF-17 * 15 million = 2.25 bn but if more than 300 are produced then we can get 225 aircraft for the same amount of money :help

btw can any one tell me which stand off missile are offered with Rafale & Euro Fighter :?:
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

Mr Moianwar, I have seen pictures of Eurofighters armed with Storm Shadow stand off precision attack missiles and Tauras missiles. I have read that Rafale will be equipped with the Scalp EG stand off attack missile. I guess other missiles such as JASSAM or SLAM-ER or any of these missiles could be fairly easily integrated into either aircraft. Cheers.
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

People, the actual acquisition cost of an aircraft is fairly inconsequential. No-one buys 1 aircraft (even Indonesia bought 2...) What you need to look at is the overall cost. The logisitcs support systems, training programs, simulators etc cost far more than the actual aircraft. Don't assume that because Pakistan has $2 Billion (for instance) and wants to (and is allowed to...) Purchase aircraft X at $20 million a pop, that they will be able to acquire 100 aircraft. The most they could probably acquire under these circumstances is 70-80. There's not much point having 100 aircraft sitting on an airfield unable to fly...
 

Roger Smith

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

moinanwer said:
Last year in Jang, when JF-17 made it first flight , it was wrriten in a number of articles that if number of prduction units exceed 300, the per unit cost will be 10 million if less than 300 the price will be 15 million. If it is any thing to go by, 150 JF-17 * 15 million = 2.25 bn but if more than 300 are produced then we can get 225 aircraft for the same amount of money :help

btw can any one tell me which stand off missile are offered with Rafale & Euro Fighter :?:
Once the production of FC-1/JF-17 would commence, the Chinese will inflate the cost to $25 million upwards a unit. The Chinese are very smart business people. :D
 

Paxter

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

Dream on if pakistan gets all that planes they will either rot or fall down from the sky the 15 billion isnt a "huge thing" considering the fact its on a long term span of spending and also all 3 navy,air,land are using that money ... btw who the hell said pakistan is in the top 10 best airforce in the world he better get his list right ... they are more in the top 20 .....
 

Paxter

New Member
Malaysia defence budget for the same span of 12 years is 20 billion and even them are having a realistic figure.... you dont spend 18 billion on hardware cause the maintainance and the extra cost will kill you....

Btw on the topic of Malaysia anyone has a picture of how the SU 30 MKM will look like? apperently since they dont aknowladge the existance of Israel they took out all the systems made by them and replace them with french and german ones... :?
 

mysterious

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

Paxter said:
Dream on if pakistan gets all that planes they will either rot or fall down from the sky the 15 billion isnt a "huge thing" considering the fact its on a long term span of spending and also all 3 navy,air,land are using that money ... btw who the hell said pakistan is in the top 10 best airforce in the world he better get his list right ... they are more in the top 20 .....
Its true that Pakistan Airforce does not have the required advanced airpower at the moment to project its high standards but you cannot discount it from the top 10 list. I'd suggest you go and read up some recent articles and issues in relation to the top airforces of the world. :smokingc:
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Paxter said:
Malaysia defence budget for the same span of 12 years is 20 billion and even them are having a realistic figure.... you dont spend 18 billion on hardware cause the maintainance and the extra cost will kill you....

Btw on the topic of Malaysia anyone has a picture of how the SU 30 MKM will look like? apperently since they dont aknowladge the existance of Israel they took out all the systems made by them and replace them with french and german ones... :?
The reasons for Malaysia not having Israeli kit are due to a religious disconnect.

On this issue of power, top 10 lists etc leave me cold. They usually have minimal basis in fact and tend to be biased towards the cultural or philosophical nature of the forum where the question appears.

"Top" lists are more useful when applied to a regional measurement process.

Most boards I have seen focus on the obvious issues of weapons platforms and financial issues (cap growth, federal reserves etc) - which immediately hilights the fact the the questioner has minimal knowledge of what involves military projection and military analysis. From that point on anyone who questions the ranking ends up struggling to explain the obvious.

There is one hyperpower, a group of superpowers and a number of regional powers. ;)
 

mysterious

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

I agree with gf completely. And yes, Islamic countries dont want anything to do with the Zionist state (atleast at the official level) so lets just keep it that way until the Israeli & Palestinian conflict is resolved. :smokingc:
 

Roger Smith

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

mysterious said:
I agree with gf completely. And yes, Islamic countries dont want anything to do with the Zionist state (atleast at the official level) so lets just keep it that way until the Israeli & Palestinian conflict is resolved. :smokingc:
That will be just a number of many and many years prior Israeli & Palestinian conflict could be resolved, till then there will be no military transaction and technology exchange will take place between Israel and Muslim countries that is the lose of Malaysia.

Turkey and India with huge Muslim population has diplomatic ties with Israel and it is taking advantage from Israeli advance technology. ;)
 

mysterious

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

It is NOT about having larger/largest Muslim populations Roger my friend, its about the Religion of the STATE!!! India is a Hindu state no matter how secular of a democracy it clammers about being and it will remain so. Turkey, much like rest of the Europe is on the path to "secularism" and its only an Islamic state for the name's sake I'd say! All other Islamic states are quite "Islamic" when you compare them to Turkey. So my point is that no true Islamic state would keep relations with a Zionist state because we Muslims know we have to show our faces to God and stand trial of our deeds when we die; and its better to keep one's honour and dignity rather than join forces (or shake hands) with Zionists who are killing Muslims each day! So Roger, like it or not, it all comes down to "religion" in the end! And lastly, I dont believe in secularism as a secular life is meaningless. :smokingc:
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

Roger Smith said:
mysterious said:
I agree with gf completely. And yes, Islamic countries dont want anything to do with the Zionist state (atleast at the official level) so lets just keep it that way until the Israeli & Palestinian conflict is resolved. :smokingc:
That will be just a number of many and many years prior Israeli & Palestinian conflict could be resolved, till then there will be no military transaction and technology exchange will take place between Israel and Muslim countries that is the lose of Malaysia.

Turkey and India with huge Muslim population has diplomatic ties with Israel and it is taking advantage from Israeli advance technology. ;)
The Israelis are without a doubt some of the best systems integrators in the world. Their electronic warfare capability really makes some of the French gear look a little pedestrian. Their missiles typically outperform European and US "equivalents",

If I had to design an ORBAT from scratch, they would have a substantial amount of gear in the list.

I've dealt with a few Israeli inventors and they were of extraordinary intellect.

One of the follies of unrelenting hate is that it can cause you to underestimate an entire people and see their worth.
 

Roger Smith

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

mysterious said:
It is NOT about having larger/largest Muslim populations Roger my friend, its about the Religion of the STATE!!! India is a Hindu state no matter how secular of a democracy it clammers about being and it will remain so. Turkey, much like rest of the Europe is on the path to "secularism" and its only an Islamic state for the name's sake I'd say! All other Islamic states are quite "Islamic" when you compare them to Turkey. So my point is that no true Islamic state would keep relations with a Zionist state because we Muslims know we have to show our faces to God and stand trial of our deeds when we die; and its better to keep one's honour and dignity rather than join forces (or shake hands) with Zionists who are killing Muslims each day! So Roger, like it or not, it all comes down to "religion" in the end! And lastly, I dont believe in secularism as a secular life is meaningless. :smokingc:

Mys..... You may be right with your theory on religion, it is all crap and we are not living in the middle ages. Religion and state should be separate for improvement and betterment of people economy and the country infrastructure. ;)
 

mysterious

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

Roger Smith said:
mysterious said:
It is NOT about having larger/largest Muslim populations Roger my friend, its about the Religion of the STATE!!! India is a Hindu state no matter how secular of a democracy it clammers about being and it will remain so. Turkey, much like rest of the Europe is on the path to "secularism" and its only an Islamic state for the name's sake I'd say! All other Islamic states are quite "Islamic" when you compare them to Turkey. So my point is that no true Islamic state would keep relations with a Zionist state because we Muslims know we have to show our faces to God and stand trial of our deeds when we die; and its better to keep one's honour and dignity rather than join forces (or shake hands) with Zionists who are killing Muslims each day! So Roger, like it or not, it all comes down to "religion" in the end! And lastly, I dont believe in secularism as a secular life is meaningless. :smokingc:

Mys..... You may be right with your theory on religion, it is all crap and we are not living in the middle ages. Religion and state should be separate for improvement and betterment of people economy and the country infrastructure. ;)
Thats the problem Roger, you're not a Muslim. If you were one, you wouldn't have posted this post of yours. You see, for Muslims, state and religion cannot be two different things; they go together. Thats the way Islam is. For Muslims, the betterment and improvement of people lies more with the spiritual and holy ways rather then western materialism. When you separate state and religion, you have countries like America, where crime rate is the highest in the world, where raping a woman accurs every 30 minutes or even much less, where sexual immorality is not an issue, where money and material well-being is all what people want (because that is how capitalism works - money is your new religion), etc. Then you have countries like France, where people are allowed to roam around naked but not wear headscarves just because it shows a sign of some religious affiliation. You see this whole idea of state and religion going together is what lies at the roots of Islam and that is why the Muslim world is lagging behind these days because they haven't found the right way to make the state & religion work together and so they are trying their best to do so. I am a proud Muslim and currently am taking up courses to dig deep in to the roots of Islam and believe me! the more I find out the more I love my religion.

In my view, the west has succeeded in prosperity and material welfare because it decided to forgo religion and accept secularism. Tell me, are the people in the west going to take their prosperity and material welfare (and wealth) to their graves? What are they going to do when asked in the afterlife about how religious they were? Are they going to answer, "Oh! We were so busy making money and gaining material advancements that we didnt get the time to pray or do at least something religious"?

The point I am trying to make here is that, once again, Islamic countries need to figure out a way to make the state and religion go hand in hand or it just wont work as a vast majority in the Muslim world is NOT ready to give up religion for the material well being and economic development at the hands of Capitalism (as far as what I have found out from my study and research).
 

Roger Smith

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

mysterious said:
Roger Smith said:
mysterious said:
It is NOT about having larger/largest Muslim populations Roger my friend, its about the Religion of the STATE!!! India is a Hindu state no matter how secular of a democracy it clammers about being and it will remain so. Turkey, much like rest of the Europe is on the path to "secularism" and its only an Islamic state for the name's sake I'd say! All other Islamic states are quite "Islamic" when you compare them to Turkey. So my point is that no true Islamic state would keep relations with a Zionist state because we Muslims know we have to show our faces to God and stand trial of our deeds when we die; and its better to keep one's honour and dignity rather than join forces (or shake hands) with Zionists who are killing Muslims each day! So Roger, like it or not, it all comes down to "religion" in the end! And lastly, I dont believe in secularism as a secular life is meaningless. :smokingc:

Mys..... You may be right with your theory on religion, it is all crap and we are not living in the middle ages. Religion and state should be separate for improvement and betterment of people economy and the country infrastructure. ;)
Thats the problem Roger, you're not a Muslim. If you were one, you wouldn't have posted this post of yours. You see, for Muslims, state and religion cannot be two different things; they go together. Thats the way Islam is. For Muslims, the betterment and improvement of people lies more with the spiritual and holy ways rather then western materialism. When you separate state and religion, you have countries like America, where crime rate is the highest in the world, where raping a woman accurs every 30 minutes or even much less, where sexual immorality is not an issue, where money and material well-being is all what people want (because that is how capitalism works - money is your new religion), etc. Then you have countries like France, where people are allowed to roam around naked but not wear headscarves just because it shows a sign of some religious affiliation. You see this whole idea of state and religion going together is what lies at the roots of Islam and that is why the Muslim world is lagging behind these days because they haven't found the right way to make the state & religion work together and so they are trying their best to do so. I am a proud Muslim and currently am taking up courses to dig deep in to the roots of Islam and believe me! the more I find out the more I love my religion.

In my view, the west has succeeded in prosperity and material welfare because it decided to forgo religion and accept secularism. Tell me, are the people in the west going to take their prosperity and material welfare (and wealth) to their graves? What are they going to do when asked in the afterlife about how religious they were? Are they going to answer, "Oh! We were so busy making money and gaining material advancements that we didnt get the time to pray or do at least something religious"?

The point I am trying to make here is that, once again, Islamic countries need to figure out a way to make the state and religion go hand in hand or it just wont work as a vast majority in the Muslim world is NOT ready to give up religion for the material well being and economic development at the hands of Capitalism (as far as what I have found out from my study and research).
I disagree with you, religion and state can function separately like in Muslim countries in Turkey, Malaysia, Indonesia and Eygpt.........which has elected democratic government. ;)

Basically, the Muslim population has been suppressed and oppressed by their rulers and religious leaders for too long and there is no independent or individual power to function or think. :)
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

Myst, the confusing thing for me is the different messages of Muslim followers.

There is no issue of "faith" for me. I find it a complex issue when people such as yourself will talk about Islam being a complete way of life, service to the disadvantaged, service to community, abandonment of visible wealth etc...

You only have to look at the Arab League and you can see contradictions already.

So, what do I use as a benchmark to judge a faith by? Is it the extremists? Is it those who somewhat gleefully wish to drive the Jews into the sea? Is it the moderates, the mature business people and military people that I interact with day to day, is it those who worship their faith and yet will have a jew and a christian in their house for a meal, is it the muslim who seeks to destroy anything that smells of western beliefs and values.

How am I supposed to know who is the true muslim out of all those people?
And its the same for Jews I know, is it the moderate who abhors violence and wants to co-exist with the Palestinians? or is it the fundamentalist orthodox jew?

I suspect that i've lived a little longer than most of the people who frequent this forum, and yet what I can tell you is that having been around the world, having lived in a few countries, the most dangerous people I meet are those whose faith blinds them enough to stop being decent to others.
In it's most raw form, a fundamentalist conviction is just as frightening as the individual who wields a gun.
 

mysterious

New Member
Re: 2015 and "Pakistan Air Force"

Roger Smith said:
mysterious said:
Roger Smith said:
mysterious said:
It is NOT about having larger/largest Muslim populations Roger my friend, its about the Religion of the STATE!!! India is a Hindu state no matter how secular of a democracy it clammers about being and it will remain so. Turkey, much like rest of the Europe is on the path to "secularism" and its only an Islamic state for the name's sake I'd say! All other Islamic states are quite "Islamic" when you compare them to Turkey. So my point is that no true Islamic state would keep relations with a Zionist state because we Muslims know we have to show our faces to God and stand trial of our deeds when we die; and its better to keep one's honour and dignity rather than join forces (or shake hands) with Zionists who are killing Muslims each day! So Roger, like it or not, it all comes down to "religion" in the end! And lastly, I dont believe in secularism as a secular life is meaningless. :smokingc:

Mys..... You may be right with your theory on religion, it is all crap and we are not living in the middle ages. Religion and state should be separate for improvement and betterment of people economy and the country infrastructure. ;)
Thats the problem Roger, you're not a Muslim. If you were one, you wouldn't have posted this post of yours. You see, for Muslims, state and religion cannot be two different things; they go together. Thats the way Islam is. For Muslims, the betterment and improvement of people lies more with the spiritual and holy ways rather then western materialism. When you separate state and religion, you have countries like America, where crime rate is the highest in the world, where raping a woman accurs every 30 minutes or even much less, where sexual immorality is not an issue, where money and material well-being is all what people want (because that is how capitalism works - money is your new religion), etc. Then you have countries like France, where people are allowed to roam around naked but not wear headscarves just because it shows a sign of some religious affiliation. You see this whole idea of state and religion going together is what lies at the roots of Islam and that is why the Muslim world is lagging behind these days because they haven't found the right way to make the state & religion work together and so they are trying their best to do so. I am a proud Muslim and currently am taking up courses to dig deep in to the roots of Islam and believe me! the more I find out the more I love my religion.

In my view, the west has succeeded in prosperity and material welfare because it decided to forgo religion and accept secularism. Tell me, are the people in the west going to take their prosperity and material welfare (and wealth) to their graves? What are they going to do when asked in the afterlife about how religious they were? Are they going to answer, "Oh! We were so busy making money and gaining material advancements that we didnt get the time to pray or do at least something religious"?

The point I am trying to make here is that, once again, Islamic countries need to figure out a way to make the state and religion go hand in hand or it just wont work as a vast majority in the Muslim world is NOT ready to give up religion for the material well being and economic development at the hands of Capitalism (as far as what I have found out from my study and research).
I disagree with you, religion and state can function separately like in Muslim countries in Turkey, Malaysia, Indonesia and Eygpt.........which has elected democratic government. ;)

Basically, the Muslim population has been suppressed and oppressed by their rulers and religious leaders for too long and there is no independent or individual power to function or think. :)
So your point is that Democracy and Islam are two different things? Now that is ONE pro-western B.S. that I've been getting a lot recently. If you have the time and interest, please look up some Islamic books and even the Qur'an itself; true Islamic society is based on democratic style. I do agree to one thing though that it is unfortunate that most of the Islamic countries have in a way swayed away from the true Islamic teachings and have rather continued to follow their "traditional" paths. And there's a good point here, every now and then, specially when Islam is mentioned, half the world confuses "Religion" with "Tradition". There is a very fine line between the two actually.
 
Top