"Indian Navy frigate INS Shivalik conducts a close approach to HMAS Warramunga, as they sail towards Darwin to participate in AUSINDEX 21." Image Source : ADF Image Library
Interesting they (Frenchie) seems on surface basically going to offer similar program with Australia to India. Indian online and forums however very sure that with what happens to Frenchie - Aussies deal fall out due to AUKUS, Frenchie will help integrating Indian Nuclear Reactor to Baracuda based Submarine instead.Will be interesting to see what France includes in the Barracuda DE, the Picture is showing a Pump Jet, not that really means anything.
These internet rumours make absolutely zero sense. French use a LEU reactor whereas Indian reactors are HEU. If anything, French might offer pumpjet and IEP, which would be enough help. Reactor is one place we can be certain India is not expecting help from the French in. Using Barracuda as base design for Indian SSN is also not feasible because Indian SSN are meant to be double-hulled whereas Barracuda is single-hulled.Interesting they (Frenchie) seems on surface basically going to offer similar program with Australia to India. Indian online and forums however very sure that with what happens to Frenchie - Aussies deal fall out due to AUKUS, Frenchie will help integrating Indian Nuclear Reactor to Baracuda based Submarine instead.
They're claiming that there're now discussion with Indian for using French tech to improve Indian home grown Nuclear Reactor if India choose Barakuda based Submarine. Off course it's all just Indian online 'rumours' for this time around. However it's getting stronger, and based on what happens with AUKUS development, perhaps it can't be ruled out entirely.
After all Frenchie already done similar deal with Brazil for SSN based Scorpene.
The armament is basically quite the same with the Kolkata Project 15A class.MDL Delivers "Visakhapatnam" - First P15B Destroyer to Indian Navy - Naval News
Indian shipbuilder Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited (MDL) delivered the first P15B Guided Missile Destroyer (DDG) to the Indian Navy on 28 October 2021 in Mumbai.www.navalnews.com
Couple days old news on Indian Navy P15B destroyer. Similar dimension toward PLAN Type 52D destroyer. Seems India opted less VLS toward Chinese destroyer (32 v 64), however with 16 Brahmos seperately. While PLAN Type 52D seems using some of its VLS for SSM/Cruise Missile.
All in all seems still similar punching capabilities betweem both destroyers. I suspect back to the performance of sensors.
It's basically modified P15A Destroyer, and the basic design coming from more or less similar era. I do suspect more changes on the design to make it much more stealthy required new design work altogether. That will be huge undertaking on term of Yards work and logistics effort.is actually much less stealthy than older designs like De Zeven Provinciën, Horizon, Project 22350 and Type 45 classes.
If true that the elevators are not large enough, their planners are either very corrupt or very incompetent.Seems to me a bit of bad planning. Designing and building the carrier and not making the elevators large enough, thereby limiting the types of aircraft you can operate. Somebody really thought that through.
The project has been running for a very long time and was originally intended to operate the naval LCA Tejas. That said it would have been wise to scale the hangar, lifts etc for SH, and or F-35 to future proof the design.If true that the elevators are not large enough, their planners are either very corrupt or very incompetent.
I do also suspect that. This carrier program has been running too long even by other first time carrier building program. Shornet or F-35C types perhaps not in their calculation to begin with when the design being finalised.That said I would have been wise to scale the hangar, lifts etc for SH, and or F-35 to future proof the design.
I reckon you’re completely correct - the elevators in the image attached seem awfully narrow (almost super specific to current aircraft) compared to any other ‘new’ carrier I’ve seen from the same view point over the last decade.View attachment 48761
Got this picture from one of Indian defense on-line sites. The video already shown that, but by watching this picture the proportion for the deck side elevators seems bit different with contemporary carriers on this size.
The length seems alright, but the width bit smaller (in proportion) compared to others. However Indian Navy claim with 11m width it is still able to cover most medium size carrier borne fighters available, from Mig-29K, Rafael, Shornet, etc.
Still looking to Indian Media, many their local defense 'pundits' shown some questions on the claims, especially for Shornet.
I do also suspect that. This carrier program has been running too long even by other first time carrier building program. Shornet or F-35C types perhaps not in their calculation to begin with when the design being finalised.
Considering the folded width of an F18E/F is apparently 9.2 metres, they would seem likely to be correct, at least for that aircraft.The length seems alright, but the width bit smaller (in proportion) compared to others. However Indian Navy claim with 11m width it is still able to cover most medium size carrier borne fighters available, from Mig-29K, Rafael, Shornet, etc.
And Naval Group was putting a variant of the Shortfin Barracuda design (RAN Attack Class) for this program.DCNS/Naval Group has announced that they will not participate anymore with the P75I Program. In this program six conventional submarines had to be build domestically in India. One of the reasons seems to be the planned AIP-system. India demands the to be installed AIP has to be sea proven, but until now it is not in use by any navy.
France military firm quits india submarine project before PM Modi's visit
The ₹43,000 crore-contract will be awarded by the Defence Ministry following a detailed evaluation of the responses sent by the two strategic partners.www.hindustantimes.com
P75I is a follow-on program of the Scorpène/Kalvari class (P75) of diesel-electric submarines.
Indian defence RFPs often demand fielded technologies even from suppliers that have not yet fielded such systems — the French have dropped out of the P-75I submarine RFP due to such a requirement, when the Indian Navy is a Scorpène-class submarine user.And Naval Group was putting a variant of the Shortfin Barracuda design (RAN Attack Class) for this program.