South China Sea thoughts?

koxinga

Well-Known Member
The article has one major point which is worth considering.

Other than being fellow communists, Vietnam has shown a uniformed, consistent position and track record when it comes to defending their national sovereignty. They have absolutely no qualms to take on bigger powers (France, US, even China, all three are nuclear powers). They have also shown a willingness to escalate, and take casulties even if the results was a draw or a loss (e.g 1988 Johnson South Reef skirmish), UN/UNCLOS be dammed.

The Philippines, on the other hand, has no such record and mostly neglected external defence, relegating that to the US until their departure. The internal politics also means that such position can shift (e.g the previous President, Duterte for example emphasised China's military/nuclear capabilites and consider it better to take the appeasement route) . Even yesterday, Marcos lost his VP, Sara Durterte, who is the daugther of the former president.

That they proudly parade their MDT with the US and try to internationalize the conflict plays into the Chinese mind / thinking that this country is weak and depends on external help or international organisations.

This is the difference; China sees it from a predator / prey frame, the Philippines sees it from a right/wrong frame.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
Sara Duterte resignation from cabinet perhaps have influence to Chinese on keep pushing Marcos Jr. Perhaps it can be right gamble or can be something that bring reverse outcome from Pinoy public support perspective.

Either way the perception (from China) that Philippines going alone without support from others in ASEAN (on this recent SCS move, especially political move on "bragging" MDT on SCS), could also explain why China increasingly singling out Pinoy on recent SCS spats. Looking how most of others ASEAN capitals basically silences on this one, can give perception to China they are doing right gamble.

Add:

Shown what China perspective, and see the language. Deter Philippines to come and supply the ilegal ship that they put in China territory.

Why they are not detering Vietnam building artificial land mass in Spartly ? Why they're not detering Indonesia on drilling and exploit gas in North Natuna Sea ? Why they let Malaysia strengthen their outpost in Malaysian part of reefs in Spartly chains?

So clearly China in SCS asside claiming all nine dash line area, also doing cherry picking on whose they are going to confront at one time. Their CG harassing Indonesian drilling platforms, Harassing Malaysian out posts, but not so far at the extense what they're doing to Philippines. Which back to external factor in here asside internal Philippines politics. Clearly China want to influence Pinoy Internal politics. However personally I just feel something else asside that. Philippines waiving MDT factor seems part of that.
 
Last edited:

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
I don't understand why the Philippines carry out these replenishment/logistic operations with only such small boats. They now have enough frigates and corvettes to support such important missions.
US renews warning after officials say Chinese forces seized 2 boats in Philippines (youtube.com)

And closer to the shore/post, they can use some of those Taiwanese Multi-Purpose Assault/Attack Crafts which are perfect for defence against bullying chinese coast guards.

Update: now also some large chinese navy vessels are spotted in the neighbourhood.
AFP confirms 4 Chinese warships monitored off Balabac, Palawan (youtube.com)




Here some other news.
PT PAL has offered a variant of its landing platform dock (LPD)-derived hospital ship in response to a request for information (RFI) from the Philippine Navy. If ordered, then it will be PT PAL's (and Indonedia's) 5th naval ship exported to the Philippines.

 
Last edited:

swerve

Super Moderator
Shown what China perspective, and see the language. Deter Philippines to come and supply the illegal ship that they put in China territory.
Illegal & in Chinese territory according to China, but only because China's criteria for what's Chinese territory in the South China Sea are contrary to UNCLOS - although China is a party to UNCLOS.

China also says that a Japanese claim to an islet or rock south of Japan, & the waters around that islet, is illegal because it doesn't meet the UNCLOS criteria for an island - but it simultaneously claims numerous rocks, shoals & reefs in the SCS as Chinese territory, with attached waters, which fail to meet the UNCLOS criteria in exactly the ways in which it says that Japanese-claimed islet or rock fails.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

Philippines now says they will not bring MDT in SCS skirmish. Seems there're some debates internally within Philippines political establishment. As before on Pinoy media some pundits and politicians ask Marcos administration to invoke this.


Australian ASPI put article on this, while I'm not agree with all, there's one of the points that I agree on:
different arms of the Philippines government issue multiple, overlapping statements on the South China Sea, suggesting there is a coordination problem.
After I also looking on multiple responses in Pinoy media, and then this latest statement from Marcos people, seems for me the Philippines not completely ready on their next move. Considering how China is not first time singling out Philippines, especially after Marcos Jr taking over, they should preparing more on reaction move after the skirmish that bound to happen anyway.


Vietnam put offer to settle with Philippines on their claim borders in SCS. This is what Indonesia and Vietnam done with their claims borders. China will not like it, as if all ASEAN already settle bilaterally with each other, then it is more likely they're going to face China (at least diplomatically) as a Group. China want to handle the deal bilaterally with each of the neighbors, and not in one Group.

When the neighbors still have dispute with each other's, then it is less likely they move as a group, despites each of them knows they're facing Big Guy in neighborhood. Working as a group will force the Big Guy more calculations on how to deal. However working as a group also bring more cohesive results if within the group it self, they already have more solid possition. Including not bringing others into equations.

This is also perhaps why other ASEAN (asside Pinoy still have border dispute with neighbors), choose to stay in the line during Philippines and Chinese skirmish. They must also ready as a group to build common ground. When some in Pinoy's political establishment waving around MDT publicly, don't think bode well with others in ASEAN that (most of them) not want to bring/involve outsiders in SCS yet, especially US.

Add:
Marcos basically say similar thing:

 
Last edited:

koxinga

Well-Known Member
The MDT that PH has signed is a sword that has to be used lightly.. the local politicians that demand Marcos invoke MDT don't realise that by doing so, it reconfirms CN's suspicion that PH is just US puppet

MDT should be seen as a last resort, a backstop against an unprovoked attack. This is probably one key reason why they are hesitant on pulling the MDT lever too readily.

PH needs to demonstrate and be seen as having the ability to manage the situation (e.g Chinese provocations). This sends signal to both CN and US that they have their own agency and forces both to reconsider how they want to move forward.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
|"Philippine forces will defend themselves with “the same level of force” if they come under assault again from China’s coast guard in the disputed South China Sea, where Chinese personnel armed with machetes and spears injured Filipino navy personnel and damaged two of their boats in a chaotic faceoff last month, the Philippine military chief said Thursday."|

This becomes interesting. But they have to start first with more, larger and better equipped vessels for those resupply missions.

 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

China and Philippines reach agreement on protocol to resupply their stranded LST (aka stationary outpost) on the disputed shoal. Seems the agreement being reach with Philippines tacid guarantee that no US involvement will be done in the operation. All within Philippines own resources .


This and several days ago they are reaching agreement on "hotline" between each President, also in 'surface' back to Chinese preference on conducting bilateral agreement to each neighbors on disputes in SCS. Philippines clearly keep the options to still have their US alliances, however for now they are keeping the disputes within bilateral framework.

Similar thing that each ASEAN nations with SCS disputes try to keep the 'conflicts' within scope on bilateral and regional issues to each others.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

Even US mainstream media like WSJ acknowledge that China is doing cherry picking strategy in SCS. They are practically silence with Vietnam action that follows their lead in building artificial island. For the case of Vietnam, the artificial island actualy enlargement from the natural island they already occupied.

For me, I also see it as Chinese maintaining status quo. Despite all the media talks on land grabbing on SCS by Chinese with their artificial islands, actually the peak of land grabbing done few decades ago in 70's-90's. All artificial islands that China build actually on occupied possition they already have in 70's-90's.

This Vietnam artificial land extension happen also in an island already occupied by Vietnam. While Chinese gave strong action toward Pinoy on Second Thomas shoal, seems related to Philippines actually beaching their LST relative new, as Sierra Madre LST being beached only in 1999. Perhaps they considered Philippines action on that shoal disturbing existing status quo land grabbing positioning.

Either way, so far all parties in SCS, keep silence posturing toward others action on strengthening their existing occupied possitions. As China also keep silence when Philippines and Malaysia strengthening they already occupied possition, asside Second Thomas shoal situation.
 

koxinga

Well-Known Member
Among the claimants, China single out the Philippines for pressure because of the public nature that they engage on this topic, whether filing a case with UNCLOS, or attempting to draw in the United States via the MDT.

Both methods touches Chinese red lines, because it embarasses them internationally on one level and drawing the US affects their other interests (e.g Taiwan). It is not implying what China is doing is right, or Indonesia/Malaysia/Vietnam gets any less pressure from China, but explains why China cherrypicks who/how they want to engage.
 

Redshift

Active Member
Among the claimants, China single out the Philippines for pressure because of the public nature that they engage on this topic, whether filing a case with UNCLOS, or attempting to draw in the United States via the MDT.

Both methods touches Chinese red lines, because it embarasses them internationally on one level and drawing the US affects their other interests (e.g Taiwan). It is not implying what China is doing is right, or Indonesia/Malaysia/Vietnam gets any less pressure from China, but explains why China cherrypicks who/how they want to engage.
Classical bully attitude. I'm bullying you, you complained so I'm going to bully you more until you stop protesting .
 
Top