Ananda
The Bunker Group
I'm not talking about the money. I'm talking on economics survival for some developing nations due to this changes in market. Read carefully.F@@K the money
I'm not talking about the money. I'm talking on economics survival for some developing nations due to this changes in market. Read carefully.F@@K the money
That's true Rock for a wealthy nation like ours, and for Australia I agree,AnandaIn the footsteps of Russian soldiers. ‘You could die in the city, or you could die on the road’ (I)
As Russians withdrew, people who had fled returned. They found their towns destroyed, their loved ones hiding in basemen...www.lrt.lt
I know you're really good at business
But sometimes you have to take a step back
And say this is unacceptable
Not today and not my kids or grandkids
F@@K the money
Our apologies for being difficult in your attempt to discuss this topic. Please edit your posts and cite actual books or other more reputable online resources in the next 48 hours. Many thanks.How relevant is Alexander Dugin's worldview/philosophy to Putin/Special Operation Z? Besides the geopolitics, he has been claiming that the Ukraine is the "pivot point" for Russian history, for it remake itself anew.
Is this view- that considerable numbers of Russians reject the West and now want to make a "break" from it actually exist?
Will Putin actually attend? If he does then he believes there is no internal threat to his leadership, sort of the opposite impression given by his photo ops sitting alone at long tables.It seems Indonesia is going to invite Ukraine to the G20 summit after all... It's clearly a compromise to inviting Putin to the summit, despite US and her allies protest. One thing for certain though, this year's summit could actually be more pivotal than even Indonesia themselves could anticipate.
He himself said he will attend. If he ended up cancelling, would that not be perceived as weakness? Or at the very least, akin to swallowing his own word.Will Putin actually attend? If he does then he believes there is no internal threat to his leadership, sort of the opposite impression given by his photo ops sitting alone at long tables.
Perhaps outside if Russia some would conclude his absence as weakness, inside Russia, not likely as he would spin his presence protecting Mother Russia is more important than the G20.He himself said he will attend. If he ended up backing out from his own words, would that not be perceived as weakness? Or at the very least, akin to swallowing his own word.
suspect Russia basically knows well those frozen assets most likely will never back to them.
Biden already say that he wants Russia out of G20, that he will not going to be seen in same room with Putin. However he also said that if Indonesia still invite Russia, then Ukraine should be too.One thing for certain though, this year's summit could actually be more pivotal than even Indonesia themselves could anticipate.
The relationship initially was very cordial. But things turned sour after I began investigating organized crime in the city and briefing Western officials, journalists, and businessmen on activities that involved Putin.
During our conversations, Putin told me on numerous occasions that Russia needed to regain its status as a superpower. Putin did not trust the West: Western leaders were only helping Russia because it was in their own interest. Although Russia needed Western help to modernize, at some point Russia would need to go its own way and stand up for its interests. Part of Russia’s interests concerned the countries of the so-called “near abroad” (formerly part of the Soviet Union) that, Putin said, constituted Russia’s natural sphere of influence.
I think this analysis is quite spot-on. Putin had in his plans for quite some time to act against Ukraine, he just had to find the right moment.Reliable press reports suggest that Chinese leader Xi Jinping made a request to Putin to delay the invasion until after Beijing’s showcase Olympic Games had concluded. Putin’s desire to continue consolidating relations with Beijing would have given him good reason to grant this request. He stalled throughout January by engaging in diplomatic talks with the United States that the State Department on Feb. 25 said had been a “charade.” Assuming that these reports are correct (and it is hard to see Russia’s maximalist demand to roll back NATO to its 1997 configuration as a serious starting point for negotiations), this means that the actual launch decision was probably made in mid-December.
This does indeed sound ominous. On the other hand, they way things are going from bad to worse for Russia it is hard to see how Putin will be able to rebuild and try again later. The West has decided: Russia cannot be allowed to launch such wars in the future. All the documented war crimes in Ukraine certainly serves as an extra motivation to make sure Russia will not be able to launch such wars of aggression again in the future: Pentagon chief’s Russia remarks show shift in US’s declared aims in Ukraine | Ukraine | The GuardianThere’s a particularly ominous aspect of Putin’s character that was clear to those of us who knew him. Since his St. Petersburg days, his response to opposition has been to stay the course until he overcomes all resistance. If Putin’s meticulous planning fails, and he perhaps has to settle for seizing just the Donbas region, it will mean another failure on his part to solve the Ukraine problem. Given his single-minded desire for a fully compliant Ukraine and his determination to finish what he starts, no one should expect such an outcome to be the end of the story. Putin’s vindictive character and his longstanding modus operandi suggest that he would view this as a temporary setback, much like in 2014. This means that at some time in the future he would again seek to bring Ukraine to heel.
or it's more along the lines of "You didn't fire me, I quit you long ago".This does indeed sound ominous. On the other hand, they way things are going from bad to worse for Russia it is hard to see how Putin will be able to rebuild and try again later. The West has decided: Russia cannot be allowed to launch such wars in the future. All the documented war crimes in Ukraine certainly serves as an extra motivation to make sure Russia will not be able to launch such wars of aggression again in the future