Hardly surprising, the Australianised F-100 is an F-104 with some F-105 and RAN specific features, yet when I left the project the design baseline still had not been frozen. This wasn't Australian changes this was updates being received from Navantia to fix obsolescence issues and worse, design issues that had been individually addressed on each of the Spanish built ships but never captured and changed on the design.Will watch later. No wonder the BAE exec was so evasive during the first round when he was asked about when they could begin cutting steel, only 60% completion on the design is very disappointing news.
The Type 26 is a clean sheet design, after a three decade break in frigate design that is being pulled in multiple directions. The government expects a fault free build delivered ahead of an imaginary, overly optimistic schedule, and below an insufficient budget. The RN wants the most capability, flexibility and performance they can get as they don't know how long the ships will have to serve or even the missions they will have to fill, they are not even sure how many they will get as numbers have already dropped from thirteen to eight and considering what happened with the Darings, is a final total of six really out of the question? Then there is the commercial pressure to make a profit, irrespective of what the RN or Government want or need.