Russian Air Force News & Discussion

KiwiRob

Well-Known Member
Pardon a small OT.

But yesterday i heard on the news that the whole F-35A deal with LM will cost Norway an further increase of NOK 14 BILLION.

Strong $ and weak NOK is a partial explenation here..

As a Norwegian tax paying citizen, i'm definitly not lauging.. ��
As a Norwegian taxpayer (non citizen) I'm in complete agreement with you. I think Norway should cancel them, they don't need them IMO, Gripen was more than enough aircraft.
 

alexkvaskov

New Member
A little off-topic, wasn't sure where to post this. Regarding the S-400/Pantsir coupling: is the SHORAD defending very long range SAM systems a recent idea?

i.e. Is it because their strategic SAMs have become so long range they need a close in defense or was this around from the early S-300 days?
 

wsb05

Member
A little off-topic, wasn't sure where to post this. Regarding the S-400/Pantsir coupling: is the SHORAD defending very long range SAM systems a recent idea?

i.e. Is it because their strategic SAMs have become so long range they need a close in defense or was this around from the early S-300 days?
Always has been around
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
A little off-topic, wasn't sure where to post this. Regarding the S-400/Pantsir coupling: is the SHORAD defending very long range SAM systems a recent idea?

i.e. Is it because their strategic SAMs have become so long range they need a close in defense or was this around from the early S-300 days?
Well the Soviets developed the Tor for that exact purpose, which implies that the concept existed prior to the beginning of the Tor development. It's development began in 1975. So... ;)
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Wasn't the Tor intended as ground forces SHORAD?
From what I read, it was always intended, at least partially, to serve as SHORAD for theater SAMs. Remember it was also a VMF system (the Ezh/Kinzhal) which is naturally working together with the naval Buk (Shtil) and S-300F.
 

Mr.V

New Member
Interesting, the Russians plan to re-open the production lines of the TU-160 Blackjack missile carrier.

I would be interested to learn more about the capabilities of this one, being the heaviest combat aircraft on Earth, plus a variable geometry platform, the maintenance demands must be incredible.

I cannot post the link yet, but the article is titled "Blackjack comeback" just written on RT news.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Interesting, the Russians plan to re-open the production lines of the TU-160 Blackjack missile carrier.

I would be interested to learn more about the capabilities of this one, being the heaviest combat aircraft on Earth, plus a variable geometry platform, the maintenance demands must be incredible.

I cannot post the link yet, but the article is titled "Blackjack comeback" just written on RT news.
It's a vague statement of desire rather then a specific goal. Given current budget restrictions, I doubt they will pull it off. Though it's possible that the PAK-DA gets pushed back by a couple decades, for an upgraded Tu-160 in the meantime.
 

Haavarla

Active Member
Well, there was originaly 56 Su-27SM being upgraded.
But there has been some losses & smaller mishap, so we are probobly down to around 50 Su-27SM.

Then you have the 12 Su-27SM3(new airframes) which was delivered 2011 from KnAAZ. Along with 4 + a later deal on 8 Su-30M2's.

This new Su-27 upgrade are build upon the SM3 variant. Instrumentation, communication, Navigation, radar, self-defens suit etc.

Only thing i'm not sure of is what kind on engine it will get.
 

Haavarla

Active Member
Its finaly here!

✈ russianplanes.net ✈ наша авиациÑ

The new Recon pod(s) for Su-34.
I've been waiting for this.. like 10 years now.
Its nice to see the old dedicated Su-24MR off now.
I mean that thing is a dinosaur by now.

Now this Recon pod:

"The company has received substantial order from JSC "Sukhoi" for the manufacture of containers of universal Intelligence (RBM) "Owl" for the Sukhoi Su-34. According to the agreement, the first phase of cooperation involves the production of 8 containers in three versions: two - radiotechnical (PT) [ECM?], three - Radar (RL), three - optoelectronic (OE)."

Do we dare hope this RL version is an AESA radar?
 

Haavarla

Active Member
Russian spy plane spotted over LANCASHIRE: Shock sighting as tensions with Putin boil over | World | News | Daily Express

Hello Everyone.

I just wondered if there is any likely truth in this report and if so what the implications could be? Surely the UK would not allow this sort of incursion?
If i'm not mistaken. That bird is part of the interkontinental "open skies" treaty.
So the only people whom having a go at this is the Media, cause they are clueless as usuall on such matter.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Its finaly here!

✈ russianplanes.net ✈ наша авиациÑ

The new Recon pod(s) for Su-34.
I've been waiting for this.. like 10 years now.
Its nice to see the old dedicated Su-24MR off now.
I mean that thing is a dinosaur by now.

Now this Recon pod:

"The company has received substantial order from JSC "Sukhoi" for the manufacture of containers of universal Intelligence (RBM) "Owl" for the Sukhoi Su-34. According to the agreement, the first phase of cooperation involves the production of 8 containers in three versions: two - radiotechnical (PT) [ECM?], three - Radar (RL), three - optoelectronic (OE)."

Do we dare hope this RL version is an AESA radar?
RTR probably. In other words an ELINT variant. They have one that's a dedicated side-looking radar, one that's an ELINT pod to replace the old Il-18 variants, and one that's a fancier OLS system.

Meanwhile plans for Il-112V purchases through 2020 have been cut. Which makes sense given that the plane has yet to take off, never mind pass state trials or have the rather dilapidated factory prepared for producing it. It helps reduce the budget hole, and is only realistic.

http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1302138.html

Also there's talk about resuming Mi-14 production. How realistic this is remains unclear. Given that the Ka-27M is close to being ready, and apparently carries a new AESA radar, I don't know how necessary the Mi-14 would be.

http://eagle-rost.livejournal.com/461119.html
http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/62512/

Flight hours for all the PAK-FA prototypes.

T-50-1 219 hours, 197 landings.
T-50-2 123 hours, 141 landings
T-50-3 181 hours, 92 landings
T-50-4 74 hours, 49 landings
T-50-5 being rebuilt.

http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1298197.html
 

alexkvaskov

New Member
General question: how does a military with outdated equipment go about adjusting tactics, training etc to prepare against more modern systems?

i.e. how and what, if possible, would Russia change in its usage of older Flankers barring any upgrades?
 
Top