alexkvaskov
New Member
Well the Central MD isn't the lowest in priority when it comes to land forces gear, like APCs and logistics trucks.
Interestingly enough, no it's not. Maybe because it would be the one reinforcing Russian forces in Central Asia, if anything goes south.Well the Central MD isn't the lowest in priority when it comes to land forces gear, like APCs and logistics trucks.
They can replace both Su-24 and Su-27 for coastal aviation. There are places, like Kaliningrad, Kamchatka, etc. where the Navy is in control of all assets, including land units (such as Motor-Rifle units in Kaliningrad).Hmm, why is the AVMF procuring Su-30s? I suppose they're fairly competent platforms for anti surface strikes. They could have had the VVS do that for them though, unless there's interservice rivalry or lack of co-ordination.
Well they have to support the industry! But I agree, there must be airframes in decent condition they can restore..Note the idiocy of building identical new Mi-26s, when they have old ones with plenty of resource left sitting in storage.
It seems very unlikely. Currently there is a state policy of moving away from using Ukrainian engines. Have either the MoD or Mil decided whether to bother considering this proposal? Or is it something MS threw out there, and everyone just ignored?@Feanor: It was mentioned that the upgrade for the military would be different from that for civil users and that the final design hasn't been appproved yet.
Using Ukrainian engines has been proposed by Motor Sich company, and neither the MoD nor Mil have decided whether to agree to this or not.
According to the Airfoces Monthly Febuary edition, there are 8-9 A-50 in service, the rest is on reserve/Storage waiting to be mothballed and used for spares.
Yes i think they will, if we take a look at the timeframe.Meanwhile reconstruction of tiny and remote airfields is continuing with the rebuilding of the airfield Step', in the Zabaykalye.
bmpd -
It'll be interesting to see if they keep the A-50U in service alongside the A-100.
To me personally 12 or 16 would make the most sense, with 3 or 4 per MD, allowing for at least 2 operational at any one time in each MD.\There were some 25 A-50 build + 2-3 prototypes total.
Out of these there are 17 in service. Two more airframe are on reserve Storage With its fate uncertain.
Out of these 17 units, splitted into two Sq, there are only 9 A-50 maintaining missions.
So there is where the 8-9 A-50U Upgrade is coming from.
My Guess its the newest airframe being build that will get the A-50U Upgrade.
And i'm not sure Russia acvtuall need any more than 8-9 A-50U, if we look at the current AF structure..
It has a very big area to cover, though. Are those 8-9 A-50 enough for that?There were some 25 A-50 build + 2-3 prototypes total.
Out of these there are 17 in service. Two more airframe are on reserve Storage With its fate uncertain.
Out of these 17 units, splitted into two Sq, there are only 9 A-50 maintaining missions.
So there is where the 8-9 A-50U Upgrade is coming from.
My Guess its the newest airframe being build that will get the A-50U Upgrade.
And i'm not sure Russia acvtuall need any more than 8-9 A-50U, if we look at the current AF structure..
It has a very big area to cover, though. Are those 8-9 A-50 enough for that?