140 M1A1 SA tanks for Iraq At Last

[Almaleki]

18:15 GMT, March 11, 2009 STERLING HEIGHTS, Mich. | General Dynamics Land Systems, a business unit of General Dynamics (NYSE: GD), has been awarded a contract worth $33 million to purchase long-lead materials for the production of 140 M1A1 SA (Situational Awareness) tanks for the Iraq program.

The SA enhancements to the M1A1 for Iraq include a second generation FLIR thermal site, Tank Urban Survivability (TUSK) enhancements and a driver's vision-enhancing thermal viewer. The tanks will also be equipped with the TIGER engine, the Pulse Jet System, and embedded diagnostics. The TIGER engine has a monitoring system that is able to identify and alert the crew if there are potential issues with the tank.

The 140 tanks will be manufactured in Lima, Ohio, by existing General Dynamics employees.

Source : http://www.defpro.com/news/details/6092/

----

Related articles:

Iraq will receive tanks, boats and aircraft from U.S.
http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/202/

Tanks, Armoured Vehicles, Helicopters and Aircraft for Iraq
http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/91/

U.S. and Iraqi representatives discuss M1A1 Tank proposal
http://www.defpro.com/news/details/6046/

Info About the Tanks Features ..:

1-Tank Urban Survivability Kit (TUSK)
The field-installed kit includes armor upgrades to the rear and bottom of the hull; an installation of slat armor to protect the engine compartment and use of appliqué reactive armor tiles to improve flank protection. A CROWS remote controlled weapon station (RWS) mounting a .50 caliber machine gun is replacing the commander's 0.5" cupola mounted heavy machine gun, enabling the commander to operate the weapon when "buttoned up" under closed hatches. RWS is provided only for M-1A2 TUSK sets. The M-1A1s will be fitted with a thermal sight coupled with remote- viewing and firing capability.

The TUSK kit includes a bolt on armored gun shield attached to the M240 (7.62mm) external machine gun, which will help to protect the loader when he is in the open-hatch firing position. When "buttoned up" the loader will be able to use the weapon from inside, aiming it via a thermal sight which projects the target image into a pair of goggles. A tank-infantry phone linked to the tank's intercom will also be added to improve connectivity with supporting forces.

On August 29, 2006 General Dynamics Land Systems received a US Army order for 505 Tank Urban Survivability Kits (TUSK) for Abrams main battle tanks supporting operations in Iraq, under a US$45 million contract. The add-on kit will be provided for M1A1 and M1A2-series tanks to enhance crew survivability in urban environments. The kit ordered by the Army consists of a Loader's Armor Gun Shield (LAGS), a Tank Infantry Phone (TIP), Abrams Reactive Armor Tiles (ARAT), a Remote Thermal Sight (RTS) and a Power Distribution Box (PDB). Deliveries are expected to be complete by April 2009.

Under a separate order, the US Army awarded General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products (GDATP) US$30 million to produce reactive armor kits to equip M-1A2. The total contract value could reach $59 million if all contract options are exercised. The reactive tiles for the M-1 will be locally produced at GDATP's Burlington Technology Center. Tiles will be produced at the company's reactive armor facility in Stone County Operations, McHenry, Miss. On December 8th 2006 the U.S. Army added Counter Improvised Explosive Device enhancements to the M1A1 and M1A2 TUSK, awarding GDLS U.S. $11.3 million, part of the $59 million package mentioned above. In December GDLS also received an order amounting about 40% of a US$48 million order for loader's thermal weapon sights being part of the TUSK system improvements for the M1A1 and M1A2 Abrams Tanks.

Source : http://defense-update.com/products/t/tusk.htm

Images for the Tusk Kit :

http://defense-update.com/images/CITV.jpg
http://defense-update.com/images/slat-reactive-TUSK.jpg
http://defense-update.com/images/tusk-firing-stations.jpg

( I hope that the Men in the Forum bring info on : second generation FLIR thermal site , vision-enhancing thermal viewer , TIGER engine, the Pulse Jet System .

Some Pictures for the M1A1SA Aim in General :

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_001.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_002.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_003.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_004.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_005.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_006.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_007.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_008.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_009.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_010.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_011.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_012.jpg

http://jedsite.info/tanks-alpha/alpha/abrams_series/m1a1-aim-sa/m1a1aimsa_013.jpg

 

[Chino]

Isn't it dangerous to sell weapons to an unstable, erm.. Islamic state...?

Or am I just paranoid?

 

[Almaleki]

Isn't it dangerous to sell weapons to an unstable, erm.. Islamic state...?

Or am I just paranoid?

paranoid

Iam Iraqi ,, and what do you mean By Islamic State ??

 

[Almaleki]

I am Muslim I cant see anything Bad in mu culture its Just Like You have its Rules ... Not like we are terrisom NOW ...

 

[Waylander]

Can't be that bad with Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Egypt (and Australia...) already having them...

What should happen?
They cannot get any dangerous secrets out of it (which are not already compromised anyway).
And if the US ever decides to go in again the Abrams are not going to be safe from Maveriks, Hellfires and LGBs.

 

[Tavarisch]

Isn't it dangerous to sell weapons to an unstable, erm.. Islamic state...?

Or am I just paranoid?

Don't stereotype Muslims. We get enough of that from an entirely biased mass-media which only emphasizes on the small 1% of retard shits in Islam.

The good Muslims like Cat Stevens and other folk are usually left out to maintain the image of Muslims being so severely crazy.

I'm a Muslim, yet you don't see me running around on a T-72 blowing shit up now do you?

Anyways, I guess this is good for Iraq. Hopefully, the crewmen will be able to operate them better than they did with their pitiful T-72Ms.

 

[eckherl]

To all,

The tiger engine is at the present time a overhaul system in place for the AGT1500 engine currently be fielded on the M1 series vehicles. We call it Total integrated engine revitalization program. This will consist of better logistical support and engine components from Honeywell, we currently are getting approximately 700 hours out of each engine and with the new program in place we should more than double the operating hours, some of our allies have also signed on to this new deal as what can be seen inregards to Iraq who will also benefit from this program. Overhaul and support is the first phase with the second phase hopefully being that we will replace the AGT1500 with the new LV100-5, this is a outstanding engine pact that operates on 40% less engine parts, improve on reduction of fuel loss when engine is at idle by as much as 50% thus giving us a additional approximate 70 miles per tank operating range. The engine swap will not cause alot of modifications to the current engine pact bay configuration. Our new tiger program will extend the use of M1 series currently in U.S inventory by at least the year 2027.

I should also point out that the Australian tank is different in some areas over other M1 series users.

 

[Almaleki]

Don't stereotype Muslims. We get enough of that from an entirely biased mass-media which only emphasizes on the small 1% of retard shits in Islam.

The good Muslims like Cat Stevens and other folk are usually left out to maintain the image of Muslims being so severely crazy.

I'm a Muslim, yet you don't see me running around on a T-72 blowing shit up now do you?

Anyways, I guess this is good for Iraq. Hopefully, the crewmen will be able to operate them better than they did with their pitiful T-72Ms.

they think that The Islam is Jihad Company for God Damn

 

[Chino]

they think that The Islam is Jihad Company for God Damn

OK.

Please point out the part of my sentence in which I have offended Islam. If you can't, please stop acting like a drama queen.

I was talking about Iraq - your country - SPECIFICALLY. And NOT the whole Islamic world. Get it?

My describing Iraq as an "Islamic state" is incorrect, so I take that back with apologies.

The other part of my statement describes Iraq as "unstable". Is that also incorrect?

Unless you have a very different interpretation of the word "unstable" (or a very elastic tolerance) I would say that Iraq is still a very unstable country. No?

If I were to rephrase my sentence, it would read:

"Isn't it dangerous to sell weapons to an unstable country with lots of armed Islamic Jihadist insurgents running around...? Or am I just paranoid?"

EDIT: I just realised I was replying to a member already banned.

 

[Chino]

Don't stereotype Muslims. We get enough of that from an entirely biased mass-media which only emphasizes on the small 1% of retard shits in Islam.

Good point and I understand because I, too, am from a often stereotyped group - Chinese.

But again, please show me where I stereotyped ALL Muslims when I was only talking about the instability of Iraq?

I didn't say Muslim/Iraqis were "blowing up sh1ts" - YOU did.

 

[Chino]

Can't be that bad with Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Egypt (and Australia...) already having them...

What should happen?
They cannot get any dangerous secrets out of it (which are not already compromised anyway).
And if the US ever decides to go in again the Abrams are not going to be safe from Maveriks, Hellfires and LGBs.

Why not save the Mavericks and Hellfires etc by NOT selling them the Abrams in the first place?

Am I the only one whom has doubts if the new Iraqi government can survive the departure of US troops?

After the Russians withdrew from Afghanistan and the expected collapse of the Russian-backed (and armed) Kabul government, didn't all the tanks and weapons ended with the Talibans? or was I mistaken?

 

[Marc 1]

Am I the only one whom has doubts if the new Iraqi government can survive the departure of US troops?
?

They won't survive if the US leaves them defenceless with Iran across the border.

 

[Chino]

They won't survive if the US leaves them defenceless with Iran across the border.

That's one way of looking at it.

But this means you cannot stop at just selling them M1A1s. You would have to re-equip their entire military including navy and air force.

Do you really want to sell a previously hostile nation - with a young, unstable and inexperienced government - F16s etc?

The more sensible way is to guarantee its sovereignty against foreign invasion. Leave the Iraqi military well-equipped enough to deal with the insurgents. But if say Iran invades, US will come to its aid.

I mentioned Afghanistan where everything went belly-up with the Taliban eventually taking over all the Russian-supplied equipment. Do you feel that such a scenario is too remote for Iraq?

 

[eckherl]

Why not save the Mavericks and Hellfires etc by NOT selling them the Abrams in the first place?

Am I the only one whom has doubts if the new Iraqi government can survive the departure of US troops?

After the Russians withdrew from Afghanistan and the expected collapse of the Russian-backed (and armed) Kabul government, didn't all the tanks and weapons ended with the Talibans? or was I mistaken?

The technology going into this deal is not a show stopper if they were to eventually fall into the wrong hands, if not the M1 series they will go for something different, maybe with the likes of Leclercs which the French government will sell just to name one tank supplier more than willing to give them vehicles.

 

[OPSSG]

EDIT: I just realised I was replying to a member already banned.

Thank goodness you realised.... Growing old eh friend (BTW, Almaleki is away on holiday from posting for 1 month)? nfloorl:

IMHO, since the fall of the Shah, everybody now knows that you can't hope to share power with a fundamentalist group. Save for Gaza (which exist in a different space time continuum and due to special local conditions), most 'peoples' (even countries with Muslim majorities) are not so keen to support these fundamentalist groups... Hence, I' not so worried about Iraq becoming an 'Islamic' state. But I am worried that the insurgency will carry on and on. In that case, not to sell tanks to give the Iraqi army the necessary tools to fight the insurgency is also a problem...

 

[DavidDCM]

I think even after the withdrawal the US would not accept the Iraq falling into the hands of extremist groups. They sunk billions of dollars into this country and wont watch it going all nuts. The Taliban could only come to power in Afghanistan because absolutely no one cared for what was going on there after the end of cold war.

 

[Chino]

Actually, no one has actually verified if I was wrong about the Iraqi government and that they are actually doing a good job, popular etc.

Are they...?

( My news update here in China is not the most current... )

I am of the impression that there are many armed insurgents out there lying low just waiting for the US to depart, so that they can topple the infidel-created government.

If the US continue to underwrite Iraq's security after withdrawal, then Iraq need not fear foreign invasion. So all Iraq has to deal with are insurgents. And you don't need M1A1 to fight insurgency.

But if Iraq can't even handle the insurgency on its own, as so many other previous weak puppet governments has shown, then any surviving tanks will surely fall into enemy hands.

Whether or not they contain technology is not the issue. It's just preventing weaponry falling into enemy hands.

But I also agree it is a chicken/egg situation. If you don't even show a gesture of confidence (by selling the M1A1s to Iraq) before withdrawal, there surely there is no hope.

 

[Chino]

The Taliban could only come to power in Afghanistan because absolutely no one cared for what was going on there after the end of cold war.

That an Islamic government is the end result of a successful armed Islamic-inspired rebellion is inevitable.

That the Islamic government turned out to be a really bad one like the Taliban is unfortunate.

I don't think democracy is workable for Afghanistan yet. It would be more sensible to try and set up a moderate Islamic government in Afghanistan.

 

[Marc 1]

Chino,

No idea as to the popularity of the Iraqi gov't - but wasn't Al Malaki a US assisted appointment? I'm guessing hes accepted if not loved.

Just heard that the US just shot down north of Baghdad an Iranian UAV. Tends to add to what I was suggesting earlier that Iran probably can't wait for the US troops to go. IIRC I remember hearing somewhere that one of the branches of the Iraqi security services is basically entirely composed of Iranian sympathysers...That won't help.

 

[Chino]

Chino,

No idea as to the popularity of the Iraqi gov't - but wasn't Al Malaki a US assisted appointment? I'm guessing hes accepted if not loved.

Just heard that the US just shot down north of Baghdad an Iranian UAV. Tends to add to what I was suggesting earlier that Iran probably can't wait for the US troops to go. IIRC I remember hearing somewhere that one of the branches of the Iraqi security services is basically entirely composed of Iranian sympathysers...That won't help.

There is a prevailing mood that the insurgency in Iraq is petering out.

Any opinions?