Add a little more to your post so I can a add a little more to mine.The Inian Arjun Tank - is it a big dissapointment or a serious effort ?
For rifled maingun disadvantages you have two issues:Well, mine opinion - serious effort without a doubt. It is capable modern tank build from international components (best you can aquire on free market) - but nothing exceptional. The question is however its cost and true reliability/maintainability.
Take look:
1. Gun - adequate gun, however rifled which puts doubt in its barrel wear.
2. FCS - should be fairly modern, on the current world average level.
3. Protection - little reliable info. But again, i doubt there is anything exceptional in either direction. Most likely just average level a-la M1A2.
4. Engine - good engine, however with prohibitive cost.
5. Chassis - hard to tell, probably just adequate average.
Addiditional gooddies:
1. LAHAT - again, hard to tell how effective it really is.
2. ERA/APS/Shtora-like might be installed in later batches.
Conclusion: Good starting tank for a country what didnt produced own tank before. Can be safely used in own army, however cost effectivity remains doubtfull.
Yes, there is a picture of Arjun firing Lahat. Will try to find it.Is there a Lahat round that is produced to fire out of Rifled 120mm mainguns?
You know what they say - a picture is/can be worth a thousand words.Yes, there is a picture of Arjun firing Lahat. Will try to find it.
Got it..
AFAIK India produces it's own 125 mm ammunition (FSAPDS and HE), 120mm FSAPDS, HE and HESH. Pvt. sector units such as SM Group make the combustible cartridge cases (Both 120mm and 125 mm).Another problem with rifled guns is that with the UK changing to the L/55 smoothbore gun there will be no other country left which developes ammunition for rifled guns.
So every new ammunition has to be self developed.
With a 120mm smoothbore you gain access to a huge market of 120mm ammo producing countries (USA, Germany, Israel, France,...).
The same goes for a 125mm smoothbore (Russia, China,...).
It is interesting that they went with one piece ammunition versus two part, thus not relying on the UK for ammunition, why not go with a 125mm gun with one part, any good reason behind India`s decision to stick with the rifled 120mm gun other than the firing of Hesh ammunition.AFAIK India produces it's own 125 mm ammunition (FSAPDS and HE), 120mm FSAPDS, HE and HESH. Pvt. sector units such as SM Group make the combustible cartridge cases (Both 120mm and 125 mm).
- my mistake, I was under the impression that the 125mm ammunition was purchased from Russia. If local manufacture is happening, then why dont they switch to smoothbore or purchase the existing 125mm tube ?AFAIK India produces it's own 125 mm ammunition (FSAPDS and HE), 120mm FSAPDS, HE and HESH. Pvt. sector units such as SM Group make the combustible cartridge cases (Both 120mm and 125 mm).
Added later;
Local production of 125 mm FSAPDS started some time in 1998. In 1999, they had the capacity to produce 40,000 rounds/year.
It is interesting that they went with one piece ammunition versus two part, thus not relying on the UK for ammunition, why not go with a 125mm gun with one part, any good reason behind India`s decision to stick with the rifled 120mm gun other than the firing of Hesh ammunition.
Not at all, infact I noticed your post late.. India used buy Russian. Even with local manufacturing, initially they bought Russian rods. As to 125 mm tube, well it's too late in the day to change now. Why didn'y they change before? I guess they didn'y expext T-90 to make an appearence with Indian Army (They being DRDO).- my mistake, I was under the impression that the 125mm ammunition was purchased from Russia. If local manufacture is happening, then why dont they switch to smoothbore or purchase the existing 125mm tube ?
It looks like a combustable cartridge case is being used. Israel helped work out some of the bugs in the FCS as far as the stabilization system I was told, is there any other Israeli influence besides the ability to fire LAHAT.The only official reason I have heard is capability to fire HESH. Another reason may be that they don't want to change anything at this critical junction. It took some time to remove all the bugs both from Gun and FCS and it's no easy task to restart again.
Not at all, infact I noticed your post late.. India used buy Russian. Even with local manufacturing, initially they bought Russian rods. As to 125 mm tube, well it's too late in the day to change now. Why didn'y they change before? I guess they didn'y expext T-90 to make an appearence with Indian Army (They being DRDO).
I really don't have definative answers for both questions (nothing that I can back up with source).It looks like a combustable cartridge case is being used. Israel helped work out some of the bugs in the FCS as far as the stabilization system I was told, is there any other Israeli influence besides the ability to fire LAHAT.
Whats the cost comparision of the rifled 120mm versus the Russian 125mm.
... they got rid of the usual steel case base? Cuz that would be new - the rest isn't really (ok, domestically for India maybe).
- Fully combustible concept, i.e no spent cases.
Looking at the picture it looks like they are designed the same as other combustible cartridge cases. Most likely still having to deal with the flash rod also that is connected to the primer.... they got rid of the usual steel case base? Cuz that would be new - the rest isn't really (ok, domestically for India maybe).
eckherl, you have PMLooking at the picture it looks like they are designed the same as other combustible cartridge cases. Most likely still having to deal with the flash rod also that is connected to the primer.