corporalclegg
Banned Member
Update.
Russia has arrested 7 alleged ISIS members in Ekaterinburg.
Now everyone who arrested for terrorism in the Russian Federation is called ISIS member.
Update.
Russia has arrested 7 alleged ISIS members in Ekaterinburg.
Russia has also labeled airstrikes against rebels as airstrikes against ISIS. That's what I would do as well, every terrorist would be an ISIS member, every terror attack would be theirs, it's a good "brand" to use to further your goals while reducing every opposition as islamist head-choppers or their backers. Putin is my spirit animal.Now everyone who arrested for terrorism in the Russian Federation is called ISIS member.
Unfortunately it is going to take some extremely serious event for a "this will not stand" moment. After all the blood and treasure spent over the last 15 years with the outcomes that have occurred it is understandable why things are getting pretty lame.Russia has also labeled airstrikes against rebels as airstrikes against ISIS. That's what I would do as well, every terrorist would be an ISIS member, every terror attack would be theirs, it's a good "brand" to use to further your goals while reducing every opposition as islamist head-choppers or their backers. Putin is my spirit animal.
The West should consider intervening in Iraq, then from there into Syria. But can they do a lean and mean counter-insurgency operation or is the only way the standard mobilization of epic proportions and cost? Partner building has failed, training allies has failed, can they deploy a small force to clear urban centers?
The long drawn out election process in the USA may make them very passive, too. I can't believe how long ISIS has and will be allowed to exist as a territory-holding power. Where are the good ol' times of "This will not stand!" declarations?
More then that, they're claiming that the US is lying about Russia destroying two hospitals in Aleppo, since Russia had allegedly flown no sorties against targets in Aleppo that day. They then claim that two US A-10s did strike targets in Aleppo. They cite incidents in Afghanistan and Iraq where the US accidentally hit wrong targets, and initially denied it. It's part of the propaganda war and is a suspect statement. Unfortunately independent verification is likely to be impossible.The only source for this so far is the Russian military. Without another source I don't think it's worth commenting on further.
If this were true, US airstrikes in Syria would be practically over. I think the US keeps out of a smaller zone surrounding the S-400. Given that there aren't any targets there anyways (the rebels in the mountains mostly fall under the "moderate" label) it's not as big of a deal as it might seem.US launch A10 strike against Aleppo. I thought that the US were keeping well out of the Air Defense Zone set up by the Russian S-400 system. Apparently not it seems?
https://www.rt.com/news/332109-russian-jets-isis-warlords/
Almost certainly.The Russian propaganda machine up to it's usual tricks?
Here's a decent open source review of available info, by bellingcat.Almost certainly.
Turkish PM confirms shelling of Kurdish forces in Syria | World news | The Guardian“We will retaliate against every step [by the YPG],” Davutoğlu told reporters in comments shown live by state broadcaster TRT Haber on Turkish television. “The YPG will immediately withdraw from Azaz and the surrounding area and will not go close to it again.”
I must say, Turkey and the Saudis are steering down a perilous path and I'm wondering how far they are willing to go...The Turks say they have struck against targets around Azaz, and warn the Kurds not to approach the city. There are also reports that a Syrian position in Latakia was shelled. The Turks say they will act the way they have acted in Iraq. Kurdish positions at the Menagh airbase in particular were hit.
Note Hezbollah fighters and T-90 tanks are north of Aleppo with SAA forces.
Meanwhile the US has called on Syria to stop the shelling of the Kurds.
[...]
There is evidence that additional Russian artillery units are active in Syria, namely in Latakia province. They appear to be manning the Smerch and Grad MLRS being used there. Also a battery of Msta-B howitzers also appears to be there. Previously a battery of them had been spotted with SAA forces pushing towards Palmyra. This may or may not be the same unit.
[...]
Saudi troops and fighter jets are being deployed to Turkey. It seems to me that this means a Yemen-style intervention by the Saudis is off the table.
[,,,]
The Saudis say that if Assad doesn't retire voluntarily he will be removed by force.
[...]
Erdogan says Turkey's patience will expire soon, there are too many refugees.
[...]
Russian prime minister Medvedev warns of the danger of a global war for decades to come if the talks over Syria fail.
Given the recent history of US involment in the region and the "less than positive" outcomes along with the dismal performance of SA in Yemen, I find it difficult to believe the US is willing to have any part of this Turkey/SA horror show in the making. Then again, "stuff" happens!Im more concerned about the level of involvement the US is prepared for. I still worry that Saudi and Turk plans are being underwritten with tacit or explicit US support that is not being communicated to the rest of the world. I have to believe that SA and Turkey are rational if not foolish actors and would not otherwise risk even signalling such a severe escalation
The only thing that could be worse is if Saudi Arabia and Turkey believe they have American support that doesnt exist outside of backchannel phonecalls or clandestine meetings.
As an American i have zero interest in war for, over, or even against Syria and her allies. Especially a war incited by our own "allies"
The whole situation does indeed have the potential for some very serious escalation.Given the recent history of US involment in the region and the "less than positive" outcomes along with the dismal performance of SA in Yemen, I find it difficult to believe the US is willing to have any part of this Turkey/SA horror show in the making. Then again, "stuff" happens!
This isnt the first post youve made in this thread advocating for greater involvement on the part of the US which makes me feel that youre awfully cavalier with the blood and treasure of other countries and infact im having difficulty recalling any time n this thread that youve made similar calls on behalf of the UK. What im not doing is turning this into a Us vs Youz argument but i do ask that you clarify your statements or take greater care in making policy prescriptions with the blood of other nationsThe whole situation does indeed have the potential for some very serious escalation.
Looking at things from the Turkey, and Saudi perspective though, they are facing a highly undesirable outcome of a Shia dominated region directly in the middle of them both. From the US perspective seeing Russia the dominant force in the region scoring a major political and military victory with increased influence in the region for a long time to come.
I personally believe that they have to do something. It would I think be in the interest of Turkey to make peace with the Kurds as quickly as possible and try and agree joint objectives.
Could it be that Saudi or Turkish planes have already entered the fray? I'm troubled by the claims and counter claims regarding the mystery A10 bombing incident. What if the planes were neither Russian or US aircraft? Just a thought. Some verbal exchanges between Russian and US military leaders has taken place on the matter:
Russian, U.S. military leaders in Twitter spat - CNNPolitics.com
Independent observers reckon there were no planes at all. No raids corresponding to those alleged in the Russian statement were reported in Aleppo that day....I'm troubled by the claims and counter claims regarding the mystery A10 bombing incident. What if the planes were neither Russian or US aircraft?...