the concerned
Active Member
On a lighter note I take it that the an-70 and an-124 production restart are now dead in the water. Also do you think that the EU and Nato have the balls to shut the Turkish waters until Russia at least behaves normal.
Well being Māori myself, I find the last sentence highly offensive, racist and incorrect. Just go and visit Tuhoe - the Children of the Mist. Why are you concentrating upon the pureness of the race? The terminology you are using reminds me somewhat of the terminology used in the practise of eugenics which is discredited. The map you put up is not a map that shows ethnicity, nor the displacement of the pre-existing population by the newcomers, in this case Russians. This forum is not the place for such intolerant crap.
Well being Māori myself, I find the last sentence highly offensive, racist and incorrect. Just go and visit Tuhoe - the Children of the Mist. Why are you concentrating upon the pureness of the race? The terminology you are using reminds me somewhat of the terminology used in the practise of eugenics which is discredited. The map you put up is not a map that shows ethnicity, nor the displacement of the pre-existing population by the newcomers, in this case Russians. This forum is not the place for such intolerant crap.
I'm not bringing up eugenics, you are, but that is what this is partly about, ethnic Russians in Ukraine being crapped on by Ukranians, especially in Crimea. Of course there's all the other political and strategic issues but for the people on the ground it's all about the language you speak.
If it is about language, do you mean that language is the basis for the "Russian ethnicity", when the term is used in the press and by officials etc? I had assumed it was familial, rather than purely linguistic or anything to do with race or ethnicity. I only ask because I am curious as to who it includes and why? And who determines who is included in it? I am not interested in race, but the term has been used now for events in South Ossetia, Crimea, Moldova, etc, and so to understand the meaning of the term, and why it is used, seems relevant at this point. Is it a way of avoiding saying "historically Russian" as it might suggest Russian beliefs of entitlement re land elsewhere? The number of Russian speakers is rather large, and many who fought against colonialism were educated in the then Soviet Union, so it is very spread. I assume we can agree that it is not about race actually?
The issues you mention are window dressing. This is simply a land grab the Russians claim is for security but it is a rehearsal for a greater Russia (aka Soviet Union).
If it is about language, do you mean that language is the basis for the "Russian ethnicity", when the term is used in the press and by officials etc? I had assumed it was familial, rather than purely linguistic or anything to do with race or ethnicity. I only ask because I am curious as to who it includes and why? And who determines who is included in it? I am not interested in race, but the term has been used now for events in South Ossetia, Crimea, Moldova, etc, and so to understand the meaning of the term, and why it is used, seems relevant at this point. Is it a way of avoiding saying "historically Russian" as it might suggest Russian beliefs of entitlement re land elsewhere? The number of Russian speakers is rather large, and many who fought against colonialism were educated in the then Soviet Union, so it is very spread. I assume we can agree that it is not about race actually?
I think most are confused about the concepts of race. In Russia's case its more about linguistic and cultural similarities, such as Orthodox Christianity. This is why many, including Serbia, call themselves "Slovic". The term Caucasian, for example, is a misnomer that refers to the White Race as a whole; It's actually used to collectivize white phenotypes. Caucasians are mixed, from the Turkish invasions and so are Tatars. They use the term Caucasian, to classify some of mixed heritage with white phenotypes. Russia, obviously appealed to the Tatar population to get 95% of the vote. They've been around long enough, for them to accept them. Stalin did not act based off race, he killed whites, mongoloids and anything in between. Communism caused the Ukrainian Holomodors and the Russian famine of 1921. I think both sides need to downplay the race and ethnicity game. The Ukrainians for instance, blames the Russians for the Holomodor... When this is not the case, they were victimized by the same greedy ideology. The only way to solve a situation like this, is by both sides stop with this false propaganda. Members of "Svoboda" are also hypocrits, considering they fought for Caucasians in Chechnya. All sides are victims..
Frankly I think we can drop the ethnicity term and put things in terms of pro Russian or pro kievan then. It is tiring when things are framed as race issues, when they aren't.
What is the basis for people saying substantial parts of the Ukrainian army would be pro Russian? Has there been any evidence of this outside the Crimean region?
The issues you mention are window dressing. This is simply a land grab the Russians claim is for security but it is a rehearsal for a greater Russia (aka Soviet Union).
Lets get off the race discussion as it will lead to greater misunderstanding and friction - not less
If it is about language, do you mean that language is the basis for the "Russian ethnicity", when the term is used in the press and by officials etc? I had assumed it was familial, rather than purely linguistic or anything to do with race or ethnicity. I only ask because I am curious as to who it includes and why? And who determines who is included in it? I am not interested in race, but the term has been used now for events in South Ossetia, Crimea, Moldova, etc, and so to understand the meaning of the term, and why it is used, seems relevant at this point. Is it a way of avoiding saying "historically Russian" as it might suggest Russian beliefs of entitlement re land elsewhere? The number of Russian speakers is rather large, and many who fought against colonialism were educated in the then Soviet Union, so it is very spread. I assume we can agree that it is not about race actually?
This discussion of what ethnicity is or isn't frankly boggles my mind and I am not sure if it is off topic or not but I am leaning towards yes it is. I don't think it is a race issue. The Nazis invasion of Poland was branded as German protection of ethnicity but the Nazis privately knew it was land grab and the start of their final solution (a race solution) whereas Stalin saw this as a land grab and a false notion of a buffer zone against Nazi aggression. Putin wants the Crimea for security reasons only, I don't believe he is concerned about ethnicity which has little to do with race these days. Let's be honest, ethnicity is more about culture and frigging religion than race. Are wars mostly fought because of ideology, treasure, self-defence, cultural differences, or race? Like one of history's greatest empires, Rome, race didn't seem to be all that important.
Feanor, wrt the Ukrainian Constitution, what was Crimea's actual status in Ukraine before this ahem situation. Btw guys from a purely economic point of view, Russia may find it has acquired a money pit. Crimea's finances were subsidised upto 50%+ by Ukraine proper, it's GDP was lower than the rest of Ukraine (on par with Palestinian territories), the pension in Russia I think is well over twice what the Ukrainian state/funds pay & a whole lot more. I get article links from both ICAEW & ACCA + in our networks this morning many fellow members (above 2 bodies) were discussing this whole thing wrt the financial side. I'll put in more when I get more thanks.
On a lighter note I take it that the an-70 and an-124 production restart are now dead in the water. Also do you think that the EU and Nato have the balls to shut the Turkish waters until Russia at least behaves normal.
That's not the point. The point is the insult to Māoridom and myself in particular by the lie you posted about us. An apology in the first instance is required. This is not something lightly shrugged off. I've noted gf0012s post about the race posts but this is about an insult, mana and honour.I'm not bringing up eugenics, you are, but that is what this is partly about, ethnic Russians in Ukraine being crapped on by Ukranians, especially in Crimea. Of course there's all the other political and strategic issues but for the people on the ground it's all about the language you speak.
Lets get off the race discussion as it will lead to greater misunderstanding and friction - not less