T-90 in Comparison to Western Armour

Status
Not open for further replies.

eckherl

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
What is amazing with the S-tank is that swedish engineers have perfectly managed to design such an ambush tank, well adapted to the sweden defense purposes during the Cold War, and to its engagment type of terrain either.

I thought it looked pretty cool, just think of something at that size sitting in a tree line at a squat lining you up for a flank shot, about the time you figured out what was going on if you were not KIA, he would be long gone to a alternate fighting position.:D
 

f-22fan12

New Member
In the hands of a well trained tank crew and proper ammunition it could hold its own against any tank or battlefield skirmish that it may face. I would never under estimate a T-90 or T - 80U either. China has conducted extensive research on the T - 80U and T - 84, compliments of Ukraine and have placed some of the technology into the Type - 99. It is rumored that DU penetrator technology has come from Isreal.
First, exactly what technology did the Israelis give to China this time?
Second, I am proud of the Type-99 (I am not Chinese, I'm American) . The Chinese have finally overtaken the Russians. I don't like Russian tanks at all. They always thought "quantity had a quality of its own" That's the simple reason I don't like Russian tanks. They don't care for the crew, and they just build alot of bad tanks. Unlike the West that builds a few good ones. Thank you eckherl for answering my questions.
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
They build alot of bad tanks?

When was the last time you compared T-34, T-55, T-72, T-64 and T-80 to the counterparts of their time?

The west needed till the mid eighties to get parity in tank performance...
 

eckherl

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
First, exactly what technology did the Israelis give to China this time?
Second, I am proud of the Type-99 (I am not Chinese, I'm American) . The Chinese have finally overtaken the Russians. I don't like Russian tanks at all. They always thought "quantity had a quality of its own" That's the simple reason I don't like Russian tanks. They don't care for the crew, and they just build alot of bad tanks. Unlike the West that builds a few good ones. Thank you eckherl for answering my questions.
It is rumored that the design of their kinetic energy round has roots from Isreal, I would think most likely passed through Ukraine.

The kicker is, who has actually fought a modern Russian tank that Russia owns, Waylander stated it right that it took the West a while to get caught up, also everything that has been destroyed in battle of Russian design has been export models, exception being the Chechney conflicts and we cannot give them a grade of poor due to attempting to fight them in a urbanized setting. I know I am quite bias when it comes to this.:D
 

swerve

Super Moderator
... also everything that has been destroyed in battle of Russian design has been export models, exception being the Chechney conflicts and we cannot give them a grade of poor due to attempting to fight them in a urbanized setting. ...
And some of the Chechens had trained on the tanks they were fighting, so knew their strengths & weaknesses intimately.
 

f-22fan12

New Member
They build alot of bad tanks?

When was the last time you compared T-34, T-55, T-72, T-64 and T-80 to the counterparts of their time?

The west needed till the mid eighties to get parity in tank performance...
I certainly think that the T-34 was the best tank in world war II. I also now that in the 50's 60's and 70's the West was behind. But now we are ahead. I also think the reason we were behind was that the made ALOT of tanks.
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
No they not only made alot of tanks but they also made very good ones.
So often people say what a deathtrap the T-72 was because allied forces with all advantages on their side slaughtered Saddams T-72Ms.

But now let's have a look what would have been the case on NATO's main front when T-72s and T-64s became online.
The bulk of NATOs tank forces then consisted of Leopard 1, M-48, M-60, AMX-30s, etc.

So in the end the sovjets not only had numerical superiority but were also technological more advanced in terms of tanks.
And I really doubt that NATO would than have been able to get total air superiority, not to talk about dealing with the massive sovjet artillery support.

And now? T-90 is not a bad tank. Good armor and firepower, excellent mobility, APS implemented (When the customer wants it). And cheaper than western designs.
In the time of many western armies having budget problems some millions less per tank are an argument.
 

f-22fan12

New Member
No they not only made alot of tanks but they also made very good ones.
So often people say what a deathtrap the T-72 was because allied forces with all advantages on their side slaughtered Saddams T-72Ms.

But now let's have a look what would have been the case on NATO's main front when T-72s and T-64s became online.
The bulk of NATOs tank forces then consisted of Leopard 1, M-48, M-60, AMX-30s, etc.

So in the end the sovjets not only had numerical superiority but were also technological more advanced in terms of tanks.
And I really doubt that NATO would than have been able to get total air superiority, not to talk about dealing with the massive sovjet artillery support.

And now? T-90 is not a bad tank. Good armor and firepower, excellent mobility, APS implemented (When the customer wants it). And cheaper than western designs.
In the time of many western armies having budget problems some millions less per tank are an argument.
You are right. I always have underestimated Soviet equipment and tanks especially the T-72 because of what happened in Gulf War I. You are right though, the T-90 is good but as good as the others.(Challenger, Leopard,Merkava,Abrams.)
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
In the moment the german industry is able to offer nearly the complete range of ground vehicles to potential customers.

And those vehicles are near the top or are number one in the world in terms of capabilities (No always when you look at the price ;) )

For how long we can do this is questionable.
The german industry is very dependent on exports, much more than in the time of cold war (But who is not besides the US).
Some of our top projects might not have become reality (PzH2000, Puma) if developement would not have been started during cold war.

The german defense industry has two advantages over many other countries out there and one big disadvantage.
It has one of the biggest civil industry bases in the world and decades of experience when it comes to military projects.

But our own army is also chronically underfunded...
 

f-22fan12

New Member
In the moment the german industry is able to offer nearly the complete range of ground vehicles to potential customers.

And those vehicles are near the top or are number one in the world in terms of capabilities (No always when you look at the price ;) )

For how long we can do this is questionable.
The german industry is very dependent on exports, much more than in the time of cold war (But who is not besides the US).
Some of our top projects might not have become reality (PzH2000, Puma) if developement would not have been started during cold war.

The german defense industry has two advantages over many other countries out there and one big disadvantage.
It has one of the biggest civil industry bases in the world and decades of experience when it comes to military projects.

But our own army is also chronically underfunded...
German defence goods, I think will always be top notch in all aspects including price. I know this doesn't relate to the forum but your type 212 subs are simply amazing. They're said to be the quitest in the world. I wathced a TV show on AIP subs and it said their was a German engineer in WWII who developed AIP propulsion. He the fitted it to a revolutionalry new streamlined U-boat design. Just when it was going to enter service soon, the war ended. THAT just proves how good Germans are at engineering. Countries will always buy German goods though, no matter what the price. Why? they're very reliable.
 

f-22fan12

New Member
Nice to hear that but I think you overestimate us. :)
Just look at it. The Leopard 2 A6 a great, if not the best tank in the world. The Type 212 submarine. The finest, quitest, and most adavanced non nuclear sub in the world. The Eurofighter, one of the finest fighter airplanes. I still think you guys will always make top notch stuff. I think NO ONE can beat Germans in weapons enginering. Another cool fact. Do you now that the man who started America's Space/Rocket program was German? Germans were also the first country to get a ballistic missile, the V-2.:)
 

extern

New Member
I don't like Russian tanks at all. They always thought "quantity had a quality of its own" That's the simple reason I don't like Russian tanks. They don't care for the crew, and they just build alot of bad tanks.
I see, you are impressed from some mythology about 'bad commies'. You should better read some classic memoirs (Russian or German) about the issue before go for conclusion.
However, I understand, there is stiffness of control about publication in Internet in US, effectively prevents for best publication to be published for free. so I have reverse-translated for you (from Russian) some good parts from the famous Germany tank officer Carrius memoirs. He narrates about his first meet with T-34:

"....The deaf rumble, which was being moved from the northeast, woke us once in the morning. We several minutes strained rumor, after which already nothing could hold us in the buried shelters. Outside snow-storm with the prickly snow intercepted respiration . For the Russians this was ideal weather for the attack. Without expecting alarm signal, we woke company. Our suspicions were confirmed. Report soon entered, that the Russians burst open. We found the commander of luftwaffe field division in the control center in the state of complete desperation. He did not know, where its subdivisions were located. Russian tanks rumpled everything all around before the anti-tank guns had produced even a shot. Ivans took all our weapons we received before, and division scattered in different directions. Fortunately, the enemy after rapid initial victory immediately stopped. He feared to fall into the ambush. With some efforts our regiment could close the breach. This was really mad house!"

and further:

"One additional event struck on us as the ton of the bricks: for the first time appeared Russian tanks "T -34"! The astonishment was complete. How it could happen out there, while the top commanders did not know about existence of this excellent tank? "T -34" did grow prettier by armor, by ideal form and by splendid 76, 2- mm long-barrelled MG, bring everybody into the trembling, and all German tanks up to the end of the war was scared it. What we can do with these monsters, which were throw against us? At that time 37- mm the gun was still our strongest anti-tank weapon. Being lucky, we could hit the bottom of tower "T -34" and wedge it. For even more greatly luck, tank after this will not be able to act in combat effectively. Certainly, it's not very encouraging situation! Only resolve in such situation was 88- mm the anti-aircraft gun." http://militera.lib.ru/memo/german/carius_o/index.html
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Just look at it. The Leopard 2 A6 a great, if not the best tank in the world. The Type 212 submarine. The finest, quitest, and most adavanced non nuclear sub in the world. The Eurofighter, one of the finest fighter airplanes. I still think you guys will always make top notch stuff. I think NO ONE can beat Germans in weapons enginering. Another cool fact. Do you now that the man who started America's Space/Rocket program was German? Germans were also the first country to get a ballistic missile, the V-2.:)
We are regularly beaten in weapons engineering by many countries out there.

You should maybe try to be not that absolute in your opinion about several topics. :)

@extern
I would also rate T-34 as the best tank of the war but not because he was the best in overall capabilities but because he was very good without getting too expensive or difficult to produce.
So the Sovjets had the chance to field a good (And sometimes excellent) tank in fearsome numbers while Germany was not able to come even close to fielding a comparable niumber of tanks which could match the T-34 in all its versions.

BTW, running over a Luftwaffe Felddivision and crushing it into the ground is not the hardest job out there.
Those division were mostly security divisions with light weapons.
 

f-22fan12

New Member
I see, you are impressed from some mythology about 'bad commies'. You should better read some classic memoirs (Russian or German) about the issue before go for conclusion.
However, I understand, there is stiffness of control about publication in Internet in US, effectively prevents for best publication to be published for free. so I have reverse-translated for you (from Russian) some good parts from the famous Germany tank officer Carrius memoirs. He narrates about his first meet with T-34:

"....The deaf rumble, which was being moved from the northeast, woke us once in the morning. We several minutes strained rumor, after which already nothing could hold us in the buried shelters. Outside snow-storm with the prickly snow intercepted respiration . For the Russians this was ideal weather for the attack. Without expecting alarm signal, we woke company. Our suspicions were confirmed. Report soon entered, that the Russians burst open. We found the commander of luftwaffe field division in the control center in the state of complete desperation. He did not know, where its subdivisions were located. Russian tanks rumpled everything all around before the anti-tank guns had produced even a shot. Ivans took all our weapons we received before, and division scattered in different directions. Fortunately, the enemy after rapid initial victory immediately stopped. He feared to fall into the ambush. With some efforts our regiment could close the breach. This was really mad house!"

and further:

"One additional event struck on us as the ton of the bricks: for the first time appeared Russian tanks "T -34"! The astonishment was complete. How it could happen out there, while the top commanders did not know about existence of this excellent tank? "T -34" did grow prettier by armor, by ideal form and by splendid 76, 2- mm long-barrelled MG, bring everybody into the trembling, and all German tanks up to the end of the war was scared it. What we can do with these monsters, which were throw against us? At that time 37- mm the gun was still our strongest anti-tank weapon. Being lucky, we could hit the bottom of tower "T -34" and wedge it. For even more greatly luck, tank after this will not be able to act in combat effectively. Certainly, it's not very encouraging situation! Only resolve in such situation was 88- mm the anti-aircraft gun." http://militera.lib.ru/memo/german/carius_o/index.html
I have always admired the T-34. It performed wonderfully against the evil tanks of the Germans in WWII. I also admire the T-72. Although it did HORRIBLY in the Gulf War. But that was because of bad Iraqi army training+tactics. The T-62 was eaten alive by Israeli Centurions (i forgot which war, the 1967 or 1973) The Centurions knocked out some 10 T-62s for every loss As for the T-90, its a good tank but I just don't think it is as good as other western MBTs.

By the way, there is no "media control in the U.S." I have seen many sites and TV shows stating that the Soviets were ahead up until the 1980's in the cold war but I don't think that. Proof was the Centurion, which I think had the first sabot round in history? And the Chieftan had massive armor and a fully stabalised 120mm gun. I think if the Soviet/Russian army received more funding, their stuff would be alot better. I personally think the Russians/Soviets made great Airplanes.
 

f-22fan12

New Member
We are regularly beaten in weapons engineering by many countries out there.

You should maybe try to be not that absolute in your opinion about several topics. :)

@extern
I would also rate T-34 as the best tank of the war but not because he was the best in overall capabilities but because he was very good without getting too expensive or difficult to produce.
So the Sovjets had the chance to field a good (And sometimes excellent) tank in fearsome numbers while Germany was not able to come even close to fielding a comparable niumber of tanks which could match the T-34 in all its versions.

BTW, running over a Luftwaffe Felddivision and crushing it into the ground is not the hardest job out there.
Those division were mostly security divisions with light weapons.
Still think what I've told you before.
 

extern

New Member
By the way, there is no "media control in the U.S."
I didnt mean political censorship, but the Intellectual Propety Rights over-striction, that prevents appearance of free net-libraries. Just I wanted to say, sometimes one can find a rare 'antiquarian' publication in Russian, while the original English or Germany edition is very hard to achive. Thus the Russian speaking domain can offer for an interester a lot of publications about WWII, like the memoirs of the leading Russian and German groun forces commanders . Beleive me, it's just awesome possibility! WIth babelfish and google-translation it little by little become use full for a non-Russian speaking as well. I personally can offer for anybody who's interested in ground forces operations in WWII some exellent memoirs:
1) Gen. Belov "The Moscow is behind" http://militera.lib.ru/memo/russian/belov_pa/index.html - Operations of a horse corps against German tanks and infantry near Moscow and in deep German rear.
2) Marshal Zhukov "Memories and Thoughts" http://militera.lib.ru/memo/russian/zhukov1/index.html - not need additional explanation
3) Gen. David Dragunsky "The years in Armor" http://militera.lib.ru/memo/russian/dragunsky_da/index.html - the memoirs of a prominent Russian tank commander, double-awarded for Soviet Hero's star. interesting view of a Russian jew.
4) Guderian H. Erinnerungen eines Soldaten. — Heidelberg, 1951 http://militera.lib.ru/memo/german/guderian/index.html
4) Steidle L. Entscheidung an der Wolga http://militera.lib.ru/memo/german/steidle/index.html
5) Manstein E. von. Verlorene Siege. — Bonn, 1955 http://militera.lib.ru/memo/german/manstein/index.html
6) Speer Albert "Memories" http://militera.lib.ru/memo/german/speer_a/index.html - about the German mil. industry.
7) Halder F. Kriegstagebuch. Tägliche Aufzeichnungen des Chefs des Generalstabes des Heeres 1939-1942 http://militera.lib.ru/db/halder/index.html

...and a lot of mil. memoirs about every war and country: http://militera.lib.ru/memo/german/speer_a/index.html If I could to not work, I should only read them continually :laugh
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top