May be get a P3 to lob a 500lb bomb at and see if they can hit it or just stun the local fish, could be fun.what and waste a missile on training ... can't have that...
May be get a P3 to lob a 500lb bomb at and see if they can hit it or just stun the local fish, could be fun.what and waste a missile on training ... can't have that...
May be get a P3 to lob a 500lb bomb at and see if they can hit it or just stun the local fish, could be fun.
Previously the maximum number of containers was reported as 20. 12 was the number that could be carried single-stacked (4 forward, 8 amidships on the 'meccano' deck). to carry 20, the meccano deck was double-stacked. So, a marginal increase, certainly not doubled.Just noticed from the RNZN web site that HMNZS Aotearoa's full load of TEU's has nearly doubled from originally stated 12 to 22.
Some tweaking of the deck arrangements no doubt. http://navy.mil.nz/downloads/pdf/rnzn-fleet-today/hmnzs-aotearoa-factsheet-web.pdf
Can't find any official reporting of max. TEU's at 20. Previously from the Navy site RNZN - Media ReleasesPreviously the maximum number of containers was reported as 20. 12 was the number that could be carried single-stacked (4 forward, 8 amidships on the 'meccano' deck). to carry 20, the meccano deck was double-stacked. So, a marginal increase, certainly not doubled.
Same, I can't find any official document stating there is an increase. Closest I can find... is the official art from the RNZN where they state 12. However, usually, they will report the minimum number they wish the vessel to be able to carry, and if they can squeeze more into the design is a bonus.Can't find any official reporting of max. TEU's at 20. Previously from the Navy site RNZN - Media Releases
And from other media releases, HMNZS Aotearoa Logistics Support Vessel - Naval Technology
Happy that the max is now at 22 TEU;s though.
Guess I will have to help you guys out then. See p.6 of Navy Today No. 202 (August 2016) - which is where Nighthawk appears to have got his graphics from.Same, I can't find any official document stating there is an increase. Closest I can find... is the official art from the RNZN where they state 12. However, usually, they will report the minimum number they wish the vessel to be able to carry, and if they can squeeze more into the design is a bonus.
Lots of little things have changed throughout the design and build, fully laden from 24,000t to 26,000, length 166.2m to 173.2. Pennant number keeping HMNZS Endeavour's old A11 not the reported A12 and a few other minor things etc
...
However, nothing major that will affect her operational duties... other than maybe her weapons might only "be fitted for but not with"... Which is something I have always disagreed with.
another eight... it is now another ten... as it now 22 Containers not 20... which is what started this topic... at the end of the day meh! lol I have know it it has been at least 20 containers for ex-number of years... lol they are now saying 22 that's all."It has a 12-container capacity, at 25 tonnes each, including four with dangerous goods, but another eight containers could be added, says Mr Sullivan."
Nighthawk.NZ said:However, usually, they will report the minimum number they wish the vessel to be able to carry,
Some random graphic of the interwebs that everyone copied ;-) from some random website lolwhich is where Nighthawk appears to have got his graphics from.
Nice photo.A few pages ago there’re so talks about OPV designs from Vard Marine, so allow me to post photo of the first ship of the class of the Vard 7 125 OPV, launched today and is going to be operated by the ROC (Taiwanese) Coast Guard.
G'day cobber and welcome to the forum.In all the previous pictures of HMNZS Aotearoa I have seen (e.g. the one at the bottom of #7,546), the exhaust stacks are shown 'clean' on their aft and outboard sides.
However, recent photographs show antenna mounts scabbed on to their outboard sides and, more interestingly, a decent-sized 'balcony deck' on their aft sides.
I guess they'd make a reasonable Goofers Gallery for idlers to watch the helicopters come and go, but I'm guessing that's not what they're actually for . They might be for mounting fire-fighting monitors, and/or a place to put a pair of .50-cal pintle mounts, or ...?
Can anyone say what is their official function?
Navy waiting on clearance to send 140 staff to CanadaStuff said:Navy waiting on clearance to send 140 staff to Canada
The Navy is preparing to ship nearly 140 staff to Canada.
The crew of the HMNZS Te Kaha, one of two Navy frigates receiving combat upgrades in Canada, are planning to join their frigate next week once granted clearance by Canadian authorities.
Canada has counted 93,157 cases of Covid-19 and 7637 deaths, has closed its border to "non-discretionary" travel, and requires anyone entering the country to self-isolate for 14 days.
A Defence Force spokeswoman, in a statement, said the Navy crew will prepare the Te Kaha for trials on the sea, and will return the vessels to New Zealand.
"Defence is working with the Canadian Government on the entry requirements, including the requirement to self isolate for 14 days upon arrival. We do not yet have confirmation of the entry requirements," the spokeswoman said.
The Navy had 69 staff return from Canada in March as Covid-19 began to spread across the world. The spokeswoman said a number of staff remained in the country to continue essential work, but did not specify how many.
"All Navy and Ministry of Defence personnel will observe all relevant local Covid-19 regulations in returning to Canada, staying in Canada, or upon return to New Zealand," the spokeswoman said.
The Te Kaha has been in Canada since 2018, receiving upgrades on its missiles, anti-ship missile decoys, sonar and underwater telephone, and torpedo defence system.
The upgrades for the two frigates was budgeted at $446 million in 2014, with another $148m committed to the project in 2017.
I am not completely convinced that Picton is the best place. I would want to see a thorough multi-city evaluation take place.@Lucasnz & @MrConservative If a naval base was built at Picton, whereabouts would you locate it? You would want it somewhere with close road access to the town and relatively little travel time.
Neither am I for a variety of reasons. In times of conflict a fleet can be bottled up in Queen Charlotte Sound with only two entrances out; one at the Sound entrance, and the other through Tory Channel. Secondly, there is a natural hazard component there with the possiblity of damage due to seismic events. It's in a rather active seismic area. Thirdly, Picton & Blenheim doesn't offer a lot for family who have their own careers. Whilst Wellington is closes as the kea flies, it's expensive to fly across the strait or time consuming to take the ferry, 3+ hours each way, and that's on a good day.I am not completely convinced that Picton is the best place. I would want to see a thorough multi-city evaluation take place.