Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0

Lofty_DBF

Lofty_DBF

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Massive said:
Thanks Lofty,

Question on LOTE - the scope appears to have flexed a lot and in some sense is not locked down.

Is your impression that scope will be determined as they work through the process with HMAS Farncomb or is it set when the process begins?

Thanks in advance,

Massive
Click to expand...
Parts of the LOTE program are locked down the navy doesn't want the LOTE refits taking longer than 2 years. As mentioned by the Minister of Defence the condition of the platforms will determine what extra work scope is required to enable the platform another 10 years of running life.
 
Going Boeing

Going Boeing

Well-Known Member
H_K said:
So looking at the Block IV maintenance cycle (pic below) that means the RAN most likely get their subs after the first 12-month EDSRA docking period (after ~8.3 years / 100 months from initial sea trials). My bet would be on SSN 775, the 4th Block IV which started sea trials in mid-2023 and will therefore be due to finish its EDSRA in late 2032. At that point it should have ~23 years service life remaining (~2056), which lines up nicely with later AUKUS SSN deliveries.
Click to expand...
I assume that you meant SSN 795, USS HYMAN G RICKOVER. It’s possible that the USN Submarine Service would be reluctant to let that one go as he was so influential in the development of nuclear powered submarines.

The first three Block 4 boats would have sufficient reactor fuel to suit the RAN requirements for the first two to be transferred (2032 & 2034) but they would not align with the EDSRA maintenance period as your chart showed.

This Wikipedia list of Virginia class submarines indicates that the last two Block 4 boats have not yet entered USN service.

IMG_9607.jpeg
 
AndyinOz

AndyinOz

Active Member
I had the same thoughts on SSN-795 that I wonder if it might be a no go as far as it being transferred and renamed. Thought in a way there might be a little bit of poetry in Australia getting her. Oregon or Montana could fit in the frame as far as I can tell regarding the desired number of years of useful life left for boat 1 of 3.
 
H

H_K

Active Member
Going Boeing said:
I assume that you meant SSN 795, USS HYMAN G RICKOVER. It’s possible that the USN Submarine Service would be reluctant to let that one go as he was so influential in the development of nuclear powered submarines.

The first three Block 4 boats would have sufficient reactor fuel to suit the RAN requirements for the first two to be transferred (2032 & 2034) but they would not align with the EDSRA maintenance period as your chart showed.
Click to expand...
Yes sorry I meant SSN 795, not 775. Good point about the USN potentially not wanting to part with that name.

One thing I didn't mention is that EDSRAs have been taking significantly longer than planned due to the shipyard maintenance backlog. So a 2 or 3 year EDSRA (instead of the planned 12 months) would mean that it might be SSN 794 (or even 793) coming out of EDSRA in 2032. Problem solved... except longer EDSRAs pose their own issues and are probably bad all around as that would mean fewer operational SSNs and more pressure for the US to keep these hulls for its own needs.
 
spoz

spoz

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
At the time of his retirement there was a variety of views of Rickover, and not all of them particularly favourable. To some he was seen as a polarising figure who had used his influence with Congress for purposes which were not always for the overall benefit of the USN as a whole. At the same time, there were many who thought he had done much good; and even his detractors of the time acknowledged his importance in the early years of the Program
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top