Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0

spoz

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
And as noted, nor does it have CIWS. Or Nulka, so far as I can see; in fact it is rather short of decoys all around. Can’t sea EOS, either.

Arrays near the masthead are almost certainly X band horizon search for sea skimmers but they do look like a CEA product, if so not one I know.
 

iambuzzard

Well-Known Member
Yup - DTR has another one with much more detail in the May edition on pager 30-31. The radar face orientation now matches the upgraded Anzacs.

Still 32 Mk40 VLS since that was asked earlier.

What is the new set of small faces on top of the mast? Are they for top protection/ballistic missile tracking? Different band?
On ANZAC each band was a different face size. Now it looks like 4 faces (1 large, 2 medium, 1 small) for each 60 degree arc.

View attachment 52841
That looks like a lot of empty deck space above the mission bay. Room for more NSM or perhaps another CIWS?
 

Reptilia

Well-Known Member
That looks like a lot of empty deck space above the mission bay. Room for more NSM or perhaps another CIWS?
Would prefer adaptable deck launcher if possible -if it can take the weight.
An extra 8 to 16 cells without cutting into the mission bay gives you a lot of versatility, especially if they integrate both LRASM and NSM with the mk41.
 
Last edited:

Going Boeing

Well-Known Member
That looks like a lot of empty deck space above the mission bay. Room for more NSM or perhaps another CIWS?
The original layout showed the Phalanx CIWS on each side of the intake/exhaust stack which left the area above the mission bay relatively clear.

IMG_7572.jpeg

The mission bay area is large enough that on the proposed AAW version, it would be replaced by 64 Mk41 VLS as well as 16 NSM launchers.
 
Top