contedicavour
New Member
or sometimes of trade & commercial issuesEast said:What should we remember is: the war is the political extension.
cheers
or sometimes of trade & commercial issuesEast said:What should we remember is: the war is the political extension.
Apparently enough to reach Alaska, or may be even the American West Coast. No wonder everybody is very worried about this new IRBM, or should I say ICBM...Red aRRow said:I'm waiting for a successful test of the TaepeDong 2. What do you guys think will be the TD2's max. range?
Only the people who have a bone to pick with N. Kora are worried. I would rather worry about nuclear missiles held by states which have a history of attacking other countries on false pretexts and/or dropping nuclear weapons on other countries or by countries which proliferate nuclear weapons to other countries (e.g. France to Israel or U.S. to India).contedicavour said:Apparently enough to reach Alaska, or may be even the American West Coast. No wonder everybody is very worried about this new IRBM, or should I say ICBM...
Atleast N. Korea doesn't go around preaching peace while selling weapons on the side. The countries that do are hypocritical and double faced. Anyways I think this is degenerating into a political debate so lets get back to topic....i.e. what would be the response from our double faced 'preachers of peace' countries this time.Waylander said:Oh common. As if NK is not selling its nuclear and missile tech to everyone who wants it and pays cash with dollars.
Mate i have to say that i think all of that is total BS. i agree that rouge nations have to be dealt with and cant just be appeased. But you cant say that the U.S. and the west is "weak" because we dont go marching across the DMZ or immediatly nuke Pyonyang and Tehran. And 9/11 and pearl harbour happened in compleatly different circumstances. Pearl Harbour was an act by a large, indusrialised modern state with large armed forces and occured in the greater context of world war 2, the apex of industrial warfare. 9/11 was an operation carried out by a terrorist orginisation hiding under a weak government that couldn't stand up to 5% of peacetime U.S. military power. So the fact the U.S. didn't react in the same way as it did 60 years ago under compleatly different circumstances means that the're weak? And look at their commitment to Vietnam, a war lasting over 10 yerars that cost them over 50 000 dead and had dubiouse strategig gains. You think that if there was a really dangerouse threat to global security, like an invasion of S Korea by the North or the use of nuclear weapons by tehran that the U.S. wouldn't be willing go all out? Personally i dont understand this "american generation is weak" theory, there is no evidence to support it. The same arguments were made at the begining of WW2, and look at what those soft little arkasaw boys did. It doesn't make much scence to just invade and destroy annother nation because of their political ideals. Granted that if these nations get too beligerant action should be taken, but we cant just go destroying rougue nations. There are allways better ways to achieve your objectives than all out war. that kind of attitude isn't going to make the west manny friends and will probibly amplify the problem later on. So dont count the yanks out of a full scale war with n Korea or iran if they step too far out of line. or if you have some evidence of this american "softness" id love to hear it, you might change my mind?watchman said:North Korea has again demonstrated how weak is the US. The US is full of rhetoric yet takes no action. The Americans & the free world are deluding themselves that North Korea & other terrorist nations can be negotiated. They forgot the lessons of history that mad men like Hitler do not give a dammed about negotiations. Terrorist nations only understand the use of brute force! North Korea & Iran knew that the US does not have the will power to fight a long & bloody war.
During World War II, 2,000 died during the attack in Pear Harbor. Yet the US mobilize 14,000,000 men & 500,000 willingly sacrificetheir lives to win the war. During 9/11 more than 3,000 Americans died, more than the Pearl Harbor casualties yet there was no general mobilization. This new American generation is shamefully indifferent to what is happening & is about to happen to their country. North Korea & other terrorist countries are determine to win because they knew that this new American generation does not have the endurance & perseverance necessary to win a long & bloody war. This weakness & lack of will power will unfortunately lead to the destruction of America.
I guess you forgot about their ballistic missile exports and involvement in the Khan network. As far as I can remember they are the only nation that exports ballistic missiles. But yes, its true, the midget with the hairpiece doesn't go around preaching peace.Atleast N. Korea doesn't go around preaching peace while selling weapons on the side.
You forgot the fact that the Japanese Empire was organized military force, capable of a full invasion of US soil. The 9/11 terror attacks were pretty much a single coordinated attacks, the possibility that Taliban launch a full scale invasion in the US is zero, they can't do that...watchman said:During World War II, 2,000 died during the attack in Pear Harbor. Yet the US mobilize 14,000,000 men & 500,000 willingly sacrificetheir lives to win the war. During 9/11 more than 3,000 Americans died, more than the Pearl Harbor casualties yet there was no general mobilization. This new American generation is shamefully indifferent to what is happening & is about to happen to their country. North Korea & other terrorist countries are determine to win because they knew that this new American generation does not have the endurance & perseverance necessary to win a long & bloody war. This weakness & lack of will power will unfortunately lead to the destruction of America.
LtDragon said:You forgot the fact that the Japanese Empire was organized military force, capable of a full invasion of US soil.
That's true ! If the Enterprise and the Hornet and the Wasp had been in Pearl Harbor, the USN would not have been able to counterattack Japan before spring 1944 at best (building a carrier from scratch back then took 2 years minimum).Waylander said:If they would have arrived some days earlier the mighty US carrier force would have been sunk and with it most plans to stop Japan from achieving its goals in the pacific.
Yep and they almost made it by the way... controlling most of coastal China, all of Korea, all of Indochina, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines and most islands. If the USN had lost its carriers at Pearl, that would have left the Japanese a further 2-3 years to consolidate their dominance and potentially occupy bits of India and Australia. What a nightmare scenario, happily enough the Enterprise, Hornet, Saratoga and Wasp lived onWaylander said:The goal of Japan had never been a full scale attack onto the US.
Their target was to cripple the USN pacific heavy enough to conquer the the resource rich territories in their pacific neighbourhood.