Pakistan Navy (PN) News, Updates & Discussions

A

Aussie Digger

Guest
contedicavour said:
Does the PN require its subs to be able to perform land attack missions ? Wouldn't the old & new Agostas be busy enough performing "sea denial" missions against surface ships & carrier task forces ?
I think adding land attack complicates life further for SSKs who would already have to spearhead extremely dangerous anti-shipping tasks, while defending themselves from Scorpenes tomorrow and modernized Kilos today...

cheers
It also significantly reduces the anti-ship and anti-submarine weapons capability of the subs which is the primary role for the SSK's. "Dual role" weapons (Anti-ship/land attack) can only provide a partial solution in my opinion.

Weapons such as Harpoon II have a "land attack" capability, but are limited in range and the warhead is designed for ASM missions. Technically they could be used, but I think it will be rare that they ever will.
 

Red aRRow

Forum Bouncer
^^ Yes, but I think if Pakistan manages to integrate it's BABUR cruise missile with the submarines (current ones or the ones which will be purchased in the future) then they could very well be used in attacking shore targets or as a second strike nuclear platform.
 

tphuang

Super Moderator
umair said:
It's diameter is close to about 500mm. Theoretically it is sublaunch capable.
well, it still has a lot to do. Basically, you only have the land launched version and it has only had its second test earlier this year. Then, you have to develop the air launched version. Sub launched version has a long way to go.
 

umair

Peace Enforcer
All of the above points are valid, but the thing is that high up the decision has been taken to judge the feasability of giving the navy the second strike responsibility. Now I'm not that much of a navy buff but from what I've gathered so far the signs all point in the direction of a sub based nuclear deterrent, and my judgement, keeping in mind the options open to the PN points towards sublaunched LACMs. What will actually happen, I have no clue.
 

aaaditya

New Member
what is the length of the babar ?would it reduce the torpedo armament ? i believe the capability of the agosta-90b is 16 to 18 weapons(a mix of torpedos and missiles) according to the naval-technology website?
 

contedicavour

New Member
aaaditya said:
what is the length of the babar ?would it reduce the torpedo armament ? i believe the capability of the agosta-90b is 16 to 18 weapons(a mix of torpedos and missiles) according to the naval-technology website?
Agosta 90B carry a mix of 20 ECANF17P French torpedoes and SM39 missiles.
I don't have a clue of the size of the Babur, however.

cheers
 

contedicavour

New Member
umair said:
All of the above points are valid, but the thing is that high up the decision has been taken to judge the feasability of giving the navy the second strike responsibility. Now I'm not that much of a navy buff but from what I've gathered so far the signs all point in the direction of a sub based nuclear deterrent, and my judgement, keeping in mind the options open to the PN points towards sublaunched LACMs. What will actually happen, I have no clue.
I understand that the PN may wish to use A90B SSKs as launch platforms for nuclear tipped Baburs. In the world of nuclear deterrence, it may make sense. However I don't think it would make sense to put conventional Baburs aboard, since launching land attack cruise missiles frankly is a luxury. The A90Bs would be very busy escaping improved Kilos and Scorpenes, and trying to attack the Indian carrier groups.

cheers
 

WAR

New Member
Pakistani and US navies to hold joint exercises

Link:
http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp#9001



Pakistani and US navies to hold joint exercises

Updated at 1900 PST

Islamabad: The Pakistan Navy announced Friday that it would conduct joint exercises with the US Navy in the Arabian Sea for two weeks, beginning Monday. An Agosta 90-B submarine and three surface ships of the Pakistan Navy and a similar number of US ships and the aircraft carrier Enterprise are to participate, the announcement said.

It said the purpose was to gain experience in advanced maritime interdiction operations to counter terrorism.

Pakistan is a key ally of the United States in its global war on terrorism, and it recently relinquished the command of the naval task force of the anti-terrorism coalition in the area.


==============

The real test would be of Agosta 90B.
 
Last edited:

contedicavour

New Member
WAR said:
Link:
http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp#9001



Pakistani and US navies to hold joint exercises

Updated at 1900 PST

Islamabad: The Pakistan Navy announced Friday that it would conduct joint exercises with the US Navy in the Arabian Sea for two weeks, beginning Monday. An Agosta 90-B submarine and three surface ships of the Pakistan Navy and a similar number of US ships and the aircraft carrier Enterprise are to participate, the announcement said.

It said the purpose was to gain experience in advanced maritime interdiction operations to counter terrorism.

Pakistan is a key ally of the United States in its global war on terrorism, and it recently relinquished the command of the naval task force of the anti-terrorism coalition in the area.


==============

The real test would be of Agosta 90B.
Still no news of the ex USN Spruance destroyer offered to Pakistan ?
Has you country's navy rejected the offer ?

cheers
 

aaaditya

New Member
hey guys good news for pakistanis ,the pakistani navy has placed orders for 2 new mrtp33 patrol boats.

here check out this link and article:

http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1051485

LONDON: Pakistan has ordered two advanced fast attack naval craft from Turkey, a leading defence weekly claimed on Wednesday.

The MRTP 33 vessels are considered the most recent patrol craft, the latest in a series that includes the MRTP 15 operated by Pakistan's Special Service Group, according to Jane's Defence Weekly.

It has a length of 35.6 m and carries a crew of 20, with a combined diesel and gas high-speed propulsion system. The diesels allow a patrol speed of 28 kt, while the gas turbine can produce a maximum speed of some 60 kt. With it Pakistan's vessels will also be more heavily armed.

"The craft is able to carry larger equipment and payload such as a combined 30 mm gun, two 12.7 mm machine guns, short-range surface-to-surface stabilized missile launcher, medium-range surface-to-surface fibre-guided missiles, electro-optical fire-control systems and decoys," the weekly said quoting a Pakistan Navy statement.

The Navy said the acquisition should provide better control of littoral and coastal waters.

Its role would include patrol; escort, fast attack missions; maritime interdiction operations at high seas; anti-terrorist protection of coastal and offshore installations, insertion and extraction of special forces; surveillance; special operations support with naval commando delivery vehicle and search and rescue.


this vessel seems quite comparable to the indian xfac boats except that the mrtp33 is slightly more lo(low observable).
 

dreamwarrior73

New Member
good job. well done PN. its a leap forward from the current Chinese FAC to the advanced Turkish MRTP 33.

i wonder what kind of SSM these FACs can carry?
 

aaaditya

New Member
dreamwarrior73 said:
good job. well done PN. its a leap forward from the current Chinese FAC to the advanced Turkish MRTP 33.

i wonder what kind of SSM these FACs can carry?
the displacement of mrtpp-33 is very low hence i believe it can not be equipped with very powerfull long ranged missiles but instead of that it can be equipped with anti tank guided missiles modified for anti ship roles(these missiles with their armour penetration capabilities) can destroy small warships and cause considerable damage to medium sized ships.

you must not forget that the mrtpp-33 is intended for coastal/shallow water defence.

the russian mirage patrol boats are comparable to the mrtp-33.
 

mysterious

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #293
Pak has acquired capability to construct nuclear submarine Islamabad, UNI:
Pakistan has acquired the capability of developing its own nuclear submarine, a media report claimed today.

''Pakistani scientists and the engineers have developed indigenous technology for building the nuclear submarines at the existing facilities,'' The News reported.

This capability will strengthen the naval defence of the country.

President Gen Pervez Musharraf will discuss this matter with Chinese President Hu Jintao during his visit here in November this year.

Pakistan started exploring alternative sources and strategies to bridge the wide gap with India in conventional and strategic weapons/forces to sustain its independence and sovereignty.

The gap was widening due to the USos tilt towards India as compared to Pakistan. According to a military comparison, Indo-Pak conventional and strategic asymmetries until now are not primarily in favour of Pakistan.

The country has already inducted three French origin Agosta-90B submarines in its naval fleet while efforts were underway to commission at least four F-22P Chinese made frigates in the navy with first ship entering the service by 2008.

Over the years, the navy also acquired capability to indigenously manufacture small submarines, known as midgets, mine hunters, missile boats hoover craft and constructed the third Agosta with local expertise under supervision of the DCN, the manufacturer company of the Agostas.

http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/sep82006/update131158200698.asp

PN getting a breakthrough in nuclear sub tech? Hmm, would someone like to elaborate on this? I havent been able to find much more on this newspiece as yet.

Also, why does Musharraf need to discuss this matter with the Chinese President (unless of course China helped)?
 

orko_8

New Member
aaaditya said:
the displacement of mrtpp-33 is very low hence i believe it can not be equipped with very powerfull long ranged missiles but instead of that it can be equipped with anti tank guided missiles modified for anti ship roles(these missiles with their armour penetration capabilities) can destroy small warships and cause considerable damage to medium sized ships.

you must not forget that the mrtpp-33 is intended for coastal/shallow water defence.

the russian mirage patrol boats are comparable to the mrtp-33.
Original design is for 4 x RGM-84 Harpoon's: Cooperation with Boeing was made by Yonca-Onuk JV for the launching system and data-link. There is also provision for other SSM's like Exocet and Penguin.
 

mysterious

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #295
Just to refresh some discussion going in to the new Marlin subs for the PN:

Pakistan Seeks 3 Subs From France
New Design Would Free DCN of Spanish Partnership
By PIERRE TRAN, PARIS

Pakistani interest in three attack submarines is forcing France to make hard decisions over industrial interests vested in the DCN naval systems company and diplomatic and economic relations with Spain and India, analysts said.

Islamabad intends to spend $1 billion to $1.2 billion on three patrol submarines, preferably of a new design from DCN but possibly of the German 214 class, a Pakistani official said.

But the potential sale of high-tech weapons to Pakistan may be too much for the French government to swallow. The deal would steady employment at DCN's Cherbourg sub yard, but would likely antagonize India, with whom Paris recently signed a defense agreement. New Delhi also is a submarine customer, having recently purchased six of DCN's Scorpene attack subs.

The sale of an all-French design also might raise hackles in Spain. The Spanish are partners in building the Scorpene, but Spain's Navantia yard
is teaming with Lockheed Martin on its S-80 boat.

The Pakistani official said Islamabad "is interested in a single-hull submarine," distinct from quieter, more expensive double-hulled boats.

"We have made it known there is a requirement for three submarines."

Islamabad wants a formal offer within six months from Armaris, the naval marketing joint venture of DCN and French systems house Thales, so it can order the subs within a year, the official said.

The country also is looking to buy 25 to 30 highly capable fighter aircraft, and is considering the Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon and Saab JAS 39 Gripen, the official said.

A Pakistani delegation is due to go to Italy next month to see the Typhoon go through flight trials, he said.

The pursuit of the Pakistan deal shows DCN wants to develop new subs for export.

"This is a logical move, given DCN's strong installed base in SSKs [diesel-powered attack submarines] and the attractions of the SSK market," said Sash Tusa, an analyst at brokerage Goldman Sachs. But going it alone might be seen as undermining all the recent talk of building European defense, French government and industry executives said.

The submarine sale underlines the clash between industrial and diplomatic interests for France, an analyst said.

"Industry needs it, but the French government does not want to contribute to a potential arms race in the region and cannot afford to upset India," said Loic Tribot La Spiere, chief executive of the think tank Centre d'Etude et Prospective Strategique.

French military ties with Pakistan date back three decades. The Pakistani Navy was an early export customer of DCN's Daphne submarine in the
mid-1960s, setting the bar for other navies that operated near the Persian Gulf. Pakistan bought three Agosta 90B boats, dubbed the Khalid class,
in the mid-1990s. Pakistan's Air Force has flown the French-built Dassault Mirage III and V fighters.

This longstanding relationship gives DCN an edge in the competition, the Pakistani official said.

"We know their processes, their procedures," the official said.

Wanted: Export Approval

But if Paris withholds export approval, Pakistan might turn to the 214 submarine built by Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft (HDW), part of Germany's ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems. It also might consider buying the subs from China, he said.

DCN is keen to sell, but has had trouble prying export approval from the high-level Commission Interministérielle D'exportation des Matériels de Guerre.

Officially, Armaris has not proposed a new submarine, because it lacks approval for an offer from the committee. But that did not prevent Armaris officials from making an informal product briefing on a DCN design to a Pakistani delegation led by a senior naval officer in mid-February, here.

The Pakistani official said delegation members were given to understand that DCN had been cleared by the export committee to make an offer.

A French industry executive, however, said there is no offer because clearance has been withheld. And a French defense official said, "The attitude towards Pakistan is a very cautious one, where great prudence is needed."

Armaris declined comment. The Ministry of Defense spokesman was not immediately available. The Foreign Ministry and Prime Minister's office
referred questions to the Ministry of Defense.

A DCN spokeswoman said the company did not discuss its clients and declined comment. Still, the Pakistani official said his government expects a formal offer next month from Armaris.

DCN's new design, code-named Marlin, closely resembles the 10-year-old Scorpene design, but would include newer technology, including features of the Barracuda nuclear attack boats to be built for the French Navy.

Marlin would have an air-independent propulsion (AIP) unit, the Pakistani official said. AIP, an alternative to batteries, allows longer periods of running submerged.

Pakistan's third and last Agosta boat is being fitted with a Mesma AIP system, and the two earlier boats will be retrofitted. Pakistan has not asked for the Scorpene because it does not want to buy the same product as the Indian Navy.

DCN barely made any money on the Agosta deal, the French defense official said. He said it was unlikely the French government would agree to sell new subs at basement prices, the official said.

Pakistan said it got a bad deal because it paid $1.2 billion for the three subs, including a 50 percent down payment on signing in 1994, and the program is three years late.

Independence from Spain

If a Pakistan deal can be struck, DCN would regain the ability to export subs without Spanish participation.

In 1997, the French company partnered with Navantia predecessor Bazan to design the Scorpene because it lacked enough money to do it alone.

But healthy sales have padded DCN's cash accounts to some 2 billion euros ($2.4 billion), giving it enough money to invest in its own design.

Still, the Spanish connection was key to selling Scorpene to Chile, which opened up the Latin American market. But when Navantia installed a
combat management system from Lockheed Martin, DCN officials took the rejection of a similar French system as a snub.

One French analyst said Navantia's purchase of the Lockheed system was influenced by the U.S. administration, which is seeking a way to keep its 2001 pledge to sell eight diesel subs to Taiwan. Since Spain has limited trade with China, Madrid could sell the S-80s to Taiwan with little economic consequences, the analyst said.

Into the balance must be thrown France's relations with India, which has just bought six Scorpene subs armed with MBDA anti-ship missiles.

French President Jacques Chirac visited India and signed a defense agreement on Feb. 19 aimed at boosting industrial cooperation, as well as a
preliminary pact to help New Delhi develop civil nuclear energy. During Chirac's visit, India's state airline formally inked a purchase of 43 Airbus airliners, worth $2.5 billion at list price, and 15 ATR regional turboprops.

Dassault Aviation is waiting to see the terms of India's tender for 126 combat aircraft, and is ready to pitch the Rafale fighter jet, having withdrawn the Mirage 2000-5 from competition.

Christopher P. Cavas contributed to this report from Washington.

Source: DefenceNews.com (Article emailed to me by a friend)
 

mysterious

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #296
Armaris Offers Pakistan Licensed Production of 3 Subs
By PIERRE TRAN, PARIS

French naval export company Armaris, in a bold commercial move, has proposed a license deal that would permit Pakistan to build all three Marlin submarines the company offered in its bid for Islamabad’s diesel-electric submarine program, a French industry official said.

“This is one deal we have to win,” the official said. The sale is worth around $1 billion.

Germany’s HDW has made a rival bid with its 214 sub, he said.
The building of all three Marlin boats locally would mark a departure from previous French submarine sales.

In the 1994 sale of three Agosta 90B Khalid submarines to Islmabad, France’s DCN built the first in series and transferred production of the other two boats to Pakistan. The French sale of six Scorpene subs to India earlier this year followed the same industrial model.

Armaris on Aug. 26 submitted its Marlin offer to Pakistan. The offer was for the submarine only, without SM39 Exocet anti-ship missiles, as Pakistan has said it wants to arm the boats with Boeing Harpoon missiles.

The boats would be fitted for, but not with, the Harpoons, the official said.

The cost of integration of the U.S.-built missiles would be in Pakistan’s charge.

Armaris is a 50-50 joint venture company of DCN and Thales.

In Bulgaria’s tender for four corvettes, Armaris has arranged debt financing for a purchase with a pool of banks led by French bank Societé Générale, the official said. The banks would lend Bulgaria money to buy the warships, with repayment guaranteed by the Coface export credit agency.

The Bulgarian Navy put Armaris’ Gowind corvette at the top of the list after the tender closed, and the French company is waiting for a decision from the Bulgarian government, the official said. The corvette deal is worth 700 million to 800 million euros ($888 million to $1 billion).

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=2100125&C=europe

Looks like Armaris is finding hard to shake the temptation of a billion dollar deal off and is ready to commit to this venture called Marlin with the PN.
 
Last edited:

contedicavour

New Member
Wow this tender for 3 SSKs is impressive. With India having Scorpene and studying closely U214, I wonder how it will react with both its suppliers considering selling just as good or even better SSKs to Pakistan...

Political considerations aside, I know very little of this Marlin project, but all of the PN's sub fleet is French, so U214 may have a tough time getting selected !

Btw, what do we know about Marlin, vs Scorpene for example ?

cheers
 

kams

New Member
This deal is indeed a shot in the arm for PN. Freanch are having fun:rolleyes: , first selling Augosta to PN, then Scorpene to IN and now Marlin to PN.:D .

Don't know much about Marlin. You can find some info regarding Indian Scorpenes in these press releases.

Scoepene India

Scoepence plate cutting

1750 T, 67 M Length, Diving depth 300 M, Combat System - SUBTICS., Missile - Exocet SM-39

More details can be found on this link (Chilean Scorpene)

Chilean scorpene

It will be intresting to see whom India will select as a partner for her second line of submarines. By the time first scorpene is inducted, almost half of her existing submarine fleat will be retiring. As I understand India is looking for joint development (i.e there may be major modification of any exisiting sub on offer either by HDW, Armaris)
 

BilalK

New Member
This SSK deal might extend to 6 submarines (according to Pakistani officials); do not exactly know how this deal "is a shot in the arm" for PN. Anyways, U-214 has a fair chance; it saves PN from spending extra on modifying a submarine for Harpoon. Infrastructure costs will be same - regardless of origin, both Marlin and U-214 are new submarines to PN.
 

aaaditya

New Member
BilalK said:
This SSK deal might extend to 6 submarines (according to Pakistani officials); do not exactly know how this deal "is a shot in the arm" for PN. Anyways, U-214 has a fair chance; it saves PN from spending extra on modifying a submarine for Harpoon. Infrastructure costs will be same - regardless of origin, both Marlin and U-214 are new submarines to PN.
one of the reasons why india rejected the u214 in favor of the scorpene was that at the time of offer the u214 did not have missile firing capability.offcourse the germans offered to integrate the russian klub,indian brahmos or the european storm shadow at a later date.

infrastructure costs would be slightly different since marlin is based on the french design ,and pakistan is a long standing fench customer ,however u214 would be a completely new design and would require some infrastructure changes.
 
Top