They said chopper are ment for the navy so y would they be required to carry anti tank wepons. i am yet to see tanks operating in the sea, plz do inlighten me with this amazing discovery of ur.Hussain said:
Well first of all Sweden is very careful and they do not want to regret something that they have done. Also when SAAB is negotiationg with a country they can just hand it over,you gotta wait. The contract needs to go through many stages until it is finalized*.
As usual, i havent recieved an "Intelligent" answer to the question above. Just the usual copy and paste.Elite Brain said:
If nobody has been able to "copy and paste" or provide links to any official comments that are newer than 2002 - that would more or less indicate that nobody knows.Elite Brain said:
Man i have no idea wt ur going about. Pakistan has no marines, it does have NSSG and they are not ment for beach landing like the marines. special forces are not ment to hold ground n fight like conventional force.Hussain said:
Buddy no body on this forum is a member of the negociation or the evaluation team, so no body knows,basically ur guess is as good as mine. if u know wt mean.Elite Brain said:
http://www.saab.se/node3299.asp?id=2005101922850
How much there would be ERIeye comming they are required for the nothern mountanious area and the Hawkeye is for sea shores.I was hearing a lot of news about the E2 and E3 hawkeyes but suddenly this news came that pakistan is buying Erieye.Do pakistan need a disaster for every purchase whether it is war in afghanistan ot in iraq or floods and also this deadly earthquakelakhani said:
The main missile Pakistan is looking towards with the JF-17 is the SD-10. This missile is still being looked at by the PAF, but some are saying that it simply does not make it to the "PAF standard". However, this missile is very similar and comparable to the AIM-120 & R-77. It lacks the kill probability but this is still under development so maybe everything get better
No problem, and regarding that question, I think we are just gonna go with the AIM-9p. Considering that we are really good with the Western technology that we aquire.That why we look for western tech to fulfill our needs.
Yeah, i was looking at the same answer in my head. But the PAF always looks at multirole aircraft. This is one part that we really don't get a fighter or bomber that only looks at one role. This is why we dont have bombers. But the C-130 does the job:lol3 . On top of that they are always escorted while on a bombing run!!
Again, no problem. I agree that the we won't be seeing the JF-17 for anti-ship role. However, If Orions or Atlantiques are to take off,they need escorts. It takes long to plan a formation to SUCCESFULLY take out a frigate or possibly even an aircraft Carrier.
