KAI KF-21

Ananda

The Bunker Group
FB_IMG_1669714403864.jpg

Too much speculations now on what's the meaning of the covering of Indonesian flag on this 5th Prototype. Some say it is simbolyse ROK Insistance that this 5th prototype (which suppose become Indonesian prototype) will not be given to Indonesian control until all payments dues being full fill.

Others (especially in Indonesian enthusiasts blogs and forum) saying it is not changing anything. They point out the symbol of Indonesian MinDef still shown under ROK flag.

Again for me, how this resolves not changing the fact, if all investment and development costs payments from Indonesia being held, as the contract stated. This 5 th proto should be assembled and parts manufactured in DI facility. This already provide DI learning curve as under license contractor.

So this whole drama really put doubt on Indonesian commitment. Nothing good coming from not showing definite resolve on any International projects. Either you in or you out, and don't put your decision in Political Limbo and Financial uncertainty.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

This Bulgarian sites claim Poland want to be participate in KF-21. The claim come from Polish magazine. Well it's not a secret that ROK try to find at least 2 'junior' partners for this project to take each 20% stake. ROK from begining only want to hold 60%, and try to find partners for the other 40%. They allready got Indonesian 20% and before try to get Turkey for the other 20%. However Turkey want to get equal footing with ROK, thus ask 40:40:20.

Now presently this 20% hold by KAI, thus teoritically KAI just sell their portion to Poland, and make 60% ROK, 20% Poland and 20% Indonesia. However just on 'devil advocate' sides, perhaps Indonesia can ask Poland to take over its portion also. Make 60% ROK and 40% Poland ;).

Considering Indonesian fleekish commitment so far in this project, perhaps it is a way out. They just turn over Indonesian flag in Prototypes, from Red-White to White-Red of Poland ones :D.

Perhaps this can also be a wake up call for Indonesian current administration for pay up or walk out.
 

T.C.P

Well-Known Member

This Bulgarian sites claim Poland want to be participate in KF-21. The claim come from Polish magazine. Well it's not a secret that ROK try to find at least 2 'junior' partners for this project to take each 20% stake. ROK from begining only want to hold 60%, and try to find partners for the other 40%. They allready got Indonesian 20% and before try to get Turkey for the other 20%. However Turkey want to get equal footing with ROK, thus ask 40:40:20.

Now presently this 20% hold by KAI, thus teoritically KAI just sell their portion to Poland, and make 60% ROK, 20% Poland and 20% Indonesia. However just on 'devil advocate' sides, perhaps Indonesia can ask Poland to take over its portion also. Make 60% ROK and 40% Poland ;).

Considering Indonesian fleekish commitment so far in this project, perhaps it is a way out. They just turn over Indonesian flag in Prototypes, from Red-White to White-Red of Poland ones :D.

Perhaps this can also be a wake up call for Indonesian current administration for pay up or walk out.
This site is on par with Eurasian times. I would take anything in it with a massive grain fo salt.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
site is on par with Eurasian times. I would take anything in it with a massive grain fo salt.
Agree on that. My post actually more reflecting my own frustration with current Indonesian administration commitment treatment on this project. This's not good for Indonesian 'trustworthy' image on doing International long term project.

So I put this as potential way out (if it's true on Polish intention), for Indonesia on the project. Indonesian administration got money if they really committed on the project. The fact they are still not paying (only lately provide small installment from overall due), plus not providing 'active' investment yet on IFX manufacturing facilities, shown still fleeting commitment.

Well it's just my banter anyway;).
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Its just hopeless.
Looking to the available defence budget, it will be not enough to finance the current wild plans for the next 10 years, let alone to also pay our debts to South-Korea and invest in a KF-X production and assembly line.

IPTN is just lucky if KAI decides to let IPTN produce some small unimportant parts like small access doors, sun shades and cupholders as compensation for the money already paid by Indonesia.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
the available defence budget, it will be not enough to finance the current wild plans for the next 10 years, let alone to also pay our debts to South-Korea and invest in a KF-X production and assembly line.
From my understanding this KFX/IFX program development allocation use defense budget, however the DI infrastructure for production and assembly will use Direct Capital Injection. This's just like PAL got DCI from MoF for Submarine manufacturing facilities. Thus it's basically using SOE Investment allocations.

This is going to be the problem. DI already got DCI or PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara), but despite some 'fanboys' hope on that PMN being use for IFX, reality that's being use for N219 program. This because PMN need to be shown how they are going to get the return back. It is afterall part of commercial Investment. Thus it shown even DI doesn't know how to justify commercial return on IFX program (unlike N219 which they have clearer business model).

Thus if it is not justifiable for commercial return, then IFX investment has to be given as part of non commercial base investment. This is seems that make difficult to be justifiable. DI is already money loosing company, is it appropriately to give them more investment on project that will not giving justifiable commercial return ?

On this revelation, I suspect seems nobody willing to take responsibility for that move. It is politically hot seat, and basically this is the problem. Investment in IFX is clearly political decision, thus any decisions to continue on that Investment must be also Political base motivation. Looking on that perspective why present administration want to put their political fortunes on previous administration project ? Especially previous administration is their political opposition.

This's the problem on doing projects that are being view as Political needs. Changing fortunes in political environment, will change the priority on the projects.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

This article part of Indonesian MinDef public explanation on the 'drama' of Indonesian participation in KFX program. Basically it is simply reiterate:

1. Indonesian "politically" still commited to the program.
2. Indonesian "financially" will continue try to pay up their commitment in the program. This shown already allocated some of overdue payment on 2022 and 2023 budget.

However they are 'glossing over' how much their due is, how much the due that will be, and how you are going to finance supporting production infrastructure. Base on several data on Indonesian payment and dues account; Indonesia so far only pay USD 170mio and has overdue payment of USD 430mio. Even all being paid it is still USD 600mio over total commitment of around USD 1.6 bio. This as Indonesia portion is 20% of total project costs of USD 8 bio.

Thus the budget that need to be set asside for project commitment is still around USD 1.4 bio. Not including of Indonesian own Investment for DI production support facilities.
If DI want to build half of KAI capacity on the project, then at least they need to come out with Investment of USD 40mio+ as KAI invest around USD 88mio for KF-21 production infrastructure.

Korea clearly still want for Indonesia participation not just to share RnD costs, but also share on initial production to reduce individual costs per fighter. The conservative calculation around USD 65-70mio per fighter come with assumption of initial batch order of 120 ROKAF and 48 TNI-AU order (total 168 order, got mixed up before). This means Indonesia still has to find USD 3.5 bio to finance TNI-AU allocation.

Thus by conservative calculation total costs for Indonesian participation in the program will be amounted around USD 5.2 bio for RnD, DI facility and TNI-AU portion. Something that so far can be calculated from open source, but not being talk officially by Indonesian officials.

How to finance that, is the 'talk' that seems being avoided so far. That amount still not as big as Rafale procurement, let alone F-15EX projected procurement costs. Question still remain if enough commitment to show the 'money'.

The Article in my opinion also shown it is 'questionable' action by present Indonesian administration to conduct 'two years study' on the project, bargain for more tech access, demanding export rights. In the end all back to original agreement. Thus after all this years of bargaining, present indonesian administration more or less back to original possition as 'junior partner' with acknowledgement the project lead is ROK as 'senior partner'. DI will have 'join' export rights 'under' KAI supervise marketing program. The thing that actually aknowledged by previous Indonesian admin when they join the program as 'junior partner'.

What a waste of time of negotiating. Damaging Indonesian reputation as 'trustworthy' partner on International project, and more importantly only 'confirm' back more or less original possitioning on the project.

Add:
In Previous post, I speculate to used direct capital injection to DI as part of financing KFX production facility in DI. Something that has precedent in PAL previously, when financing Submarine facilities.

This is going to be problematic as that kind of direct capital injection usually has to shown commercial justification. Something that will be difficult for DI condition, plus possition as Junior Partner.


However from MinDef sites, this meeting from MinDef RnD Bureau, seems shown it will be finance by MinDef. This is then in my book it is open aknowledgement, the project is difficult to justified commercially. Thus has to be finance by MinDef as part of Defense Procurement, and not DI or SOE ministry commercial Investment. This make it political investment and not commercial investment. Something that means no need to find commercial justification.
 
Last edited:

TayJG

Member
This site is on par with Eurasian times. I would take anything in it with a massive grain fo salt.
Is Eurasia Times an unreliable site? I haven't caught them in a falsehood yet. Only been reading them for like a week or two though.
 

TayJG

Member
Why would South Korea want this plane, because its main rival (DPRK) fields massive amount of cheap garbage aircraft, so that makes South Korea build a lower quality fighter as well so they can mow down herds of Mig-21/19/17/15?

Mass production of the 4.5 generation fighter will commence in 2026. The ROKAF hopes to receive 120 KF-21 fighters by 2032 to replace its aging fighters, namely the F-4E and F-5E.
Would it have been so hard for ROK to give this thing an internal weapons bay?
 

tonnyc

Well-Known Member
Why would South Korea want this plane, because its main rival (DPRK) fields massive amount of cheap garbage aircraft, so that makes South Korea build a lower quality fighter as well so they can mow down herds of Mig-21/19/17/15?
Because while South Korea is worried about North Korea, they do have other worries, such as China and Japan. South Korea remembers they were invaded and conquered by Japan and were Japan's colony for several decades. South Korea remembers that the People's Republic of China is North Korea's backer and the one that turned their near victory into this perpetual stalemate and made North Korea the threat that they are today.

You might think that these are old history, but South Korean people had not forgiven Imperial Japan's sins and PRC never stopped flexing their might in not so friendly ways.
 

TayJG

Member
Because while South Korea is worried about North Korea, they do have other worries, such as China and Japan. South Korea remembers they were invaded and conquered by Japan and were Japan's colony for several decades. South Korea remembers that the People's Republic of China is North Korea's backer and the one that turned their near victory into this perpetual stalemate and made North Korea the threat that they are today.

You might think that these are old history, but South Korean people had not forgiven Imperial Japan's sins and PRC never stopped flexing their might in not so friendly ways.
That's my point though. Why not develop a better plane, namely by giving the KF-21 an internal weapons bay? Because it lacks it, it is not a stealth fighter.
 

tonnyc

Well-Known Member
That's my point though. Why not develop a better plane, namely by giving the KF-21 an internal weapons bay? Because it lacks it, it is not a stealth fighter.
Ah. That. Older plans envision a block 1 without internal weapons bay because it's faster to develop that way and once the block 1 is in production, develop a block 2 that does have an internal weapons bay.
 

TayJG

Member
Ah. That. Older plans envision a block 1 without internal weapons bay because it's faster to develop that way and once the block 1 is in production, develop a block 2 that does have an internal weapons bay.
Has anyone in the military or civilian sector spoke about such a possibility?
 

tonnyc

Well-Known Member
Has anyone in the military or civilian sector spoke about such a possibility?

The blog entry where the picture is from is dated 2013. Similar pictures can be found by searching for KFX block 2. Over the years there had been many presentations and displays and press releases from official sources where they talk about the plan for KFX block 1 and block 2. They are primarily in Korean language though but Google Translate can often get you the gist.
 

TayJG

Member

The blog entry where the picture is from is dated 2013. Similar pictures can be found by searching for KFX block 2. Over the years there had been many presentations and displays and press releases from official sources where they talk about the plan for KFX block 1 and block 2. They are primarily in Korean language though but Google Translate can often get you the gist.
That's good for them. It pains me to see weapons stored under the wings of an aircraft that has the generic look of the most popular design for 5th generation fight jets.
 

TayJG

Member
Maybe they can have a special Block 2 version just for ROK, since presumably it would cost more to store weapons internally.

Edit: It carries Meteor too, fuckin' nice.
 
Last edited:

TayJG

Member

The future cruise missile, whose expected performances are still classified, will be export-enabled and is expected to enhance the international market appeal of the KF-21 Boramae.

The new weapon should be deployed externally from KF-21 Block 1, and in stealth configuration from Block 2 models onwards, which will incorporate the internal weapons bay.

Mass production of the KF-21 is scheduled to start in 2026 with the “Block 1” aircraft, which will be equipped with limited air-to-ground weapons and air-to-air weapons. From 2028, the “Block 2” variant will be capable of performing full air-to-air and air-to-ground combat missions. The air force is planning to acquire 40 of these fighter jets by 2028 and another 80 by 2032.


South Korea already fields a fleet of 40 Lockheed Martin F-35A fighters and is aiming to acquire 20 more of these “fifth-generation” stealth aircraft from the United States by 2028 under a 3.94 trillion won program slated to begin next year.


The less stealthy “4.5-generation” KF-21 is seen by Seoul as a means to not only modernize its aging fighter fleet and complement the new F-35As, but also to strengthen the local defense industry and potentially boost defense exports.


The aircraft will be equipped with advanced sensors, avionics and weapon systems, most of which — including the “active electronically scanned array radar,” radio frequency jammer, electro-optical tracking pod and infrared search and track system — are being developed locally.


Seoul had initially sought to secure key technologies for these systems from the United States, but Washington declined the request in April 2015, Yonhap News Agency reported, resulting in South Korea developing these systems domestically.
I didn't know all of the above before.
 
Top