Indonesia: 'green water navy'

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
In the tradition of Indonesian defence procurement, then they decided to mix SSM not two but more the merrier.
  1. Exocet MM40 Blk3,
  2. Exocet SM39 Blk2,
  3. Teseo MK2,
  4. NSM,
  5. Atmaca.
  6. C705 Reverse Engineering program
The reason ? Why not.
Is it for sure that the Teseo will be ordered? As far as i know, for now the PPAs in Light+ configuration will be delivered without anti-ship missiles.
And the NSM, wasn't it just "rencana/ada keinginan/kemungkinan" to order a small amount for the KRI Glodok 688?
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
NSM, wasn't it just "rencana/ada keinginan/kemungkinan" to order a small amount
Yes, but the program for that pocket missile boat (KSR) by Lundin still ongoing. Thus the potential for NSM still there.

PPA Light + is FFBNW for SSM, however the SSM that being design for is Taseo. Thus if they (TNI-AL) decide later on to fitting those ships as full config, more likely Taseo being the choices. Off course unless MinDef want to finance changes on equipments set up. Or just add some small amount of Taseo, Why Not.

On Paper the bulk of SSM should be Aselsan Atmaca and MBDA Exocet MM40 (and SM39 for Scorpene). However it doesn't stop some 'lobby' try to sneak in small amount of other SSM on 'special situation setups'. Why the allowed to lobby for special setups? Like I say before "why not" :rolleyes:

Add:
Reverse engineering of C705 as domestic SSM still on going, but now being add with Aselsan lobby for Atmaca which some talk going to be license locally. Then why two program for 'national' SSM ? again why Not.

I love the 'chaotic' planning of "why not' procurement strategy. In the end it is left to the finance guys trying put some sanity checks. Why not.
 
Last edited:

x100 XKR

New Member
Yes, but the program for that pocket missile boat (KSR) by Lundin still ongoing. Thus the potential for NSM still there.

PPA Light + is FFBNW for SSM, however the SSM that being design for is Taseo. Thus if they (TNI-AL) decide later on to fitting those ships as full config, more likely Taseo being the choices. Off course unless MinDef want to finance changes on equipments set up. Or just add some small amount of Taseo, Why Not.

On Paper the bulk of SSM should be Aselsan Atmaca and MBDA Exocet MM40 (and SM39 for Scorpene). However it doesn't stop some 'lobby' try to sneak in small amount of other SSM on 'special situation setups'. Why the allowed to lobby for special setups? Like I say before "why not" :rolleyes:

Add:
Reverse engineering of C705 as domestic SSM still on going, but now being add with Aselsan lobby for Atmaca which some talk going to be license locally. Then why two program for 'national' SSM ? again why Not.

I love the 'chaotic' planning of "why not' procurement strategy. In the end it is left to the finance guys trying put some sanity checks. Why not.
I would not be surprised at this stage, that somebody decided to come up with salvaging old Styx missiles from decommissioned Komar boats somewhere and call it a cost saving measure. Why not .... LOL.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

They might be not going to salvaging old Styx/P-15 missile, but they are seems seriously thinking salvaging Exocet MM38. Thus the project for Nasional SSM (so far as I miss this before):
1. Reverse Engineering C705,
2. Licensing Atmaca,
3. Refurbishing MM-38.

Rather then focusing on one project, less divide the resources for multiple project for national missile program. Why not, more projects merrier.

Add:
Forgot to mention the 'shore based' SSM that now being lobby by Ukrainian Neptune (they still seriously lobby this), Chinese YJ-12E, and India-Russia Brahmos. Why they don't considering Atmaca or Exocet? Why Not, more missile is fun.
 
Last edited:

x100 XKR

New Member

They might be not going to salvaging old Styx/P-15 missile, but they are seems seriously thinking salvaging Exocet MM38. Thus the project for Nasional SSM (so far as I miss this before):
1. Reverse Engineering C705,
2. Licensing Atmaca,
3. Refurbishing MM-38.

Rather then focusing on one project, less divide the resources for multiple project for national missile program. Why not, more projects merrier.

Add:
Forgot to mention the 'shore based' SSM that now being lobby by Ukrainian Neptune (they still seriously lobby this), Chinese YJ-12E, and India-Russia Brahmos. Why they don't considering Atmaca or Exocet? Why Not, more missile is fun.
Pokemon style missile program. Gotta catch them all!
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
20241215_205225.jpg

One of Indonesian Enthusiasts X account shown this US Embassy documents (seems already declassified) on Indonesian intentions in later part 70's for new ships whether used or new build. The deals doesn't come through, thus instead new Destroyer Escort from US, Indonesia then order 3 Corvette from Dutch, and similar thing with used Garcia class Frigate which then Indonesia procured Van Speijk class Frigate from Dutch too. Submarine from German instead refurbished US diesel Submarine.

All this also put TNI-AL then basically scratch US defense industry from future suppliers, and relies more from Euro side and some South Korea. Recently this trend goes to French, Italian and potentially Turkiye.
 
Top