I think a great deal of the F-35’s tech has already been obtained and missing info can likely be obtained from other users more easily than from the UAE, short of the UAE embracing China as its new best friend. The harder thing to steal is the expertise to actually manufacture this technology, military jet engines for instance.Biden admin moving ahead with UAE F-35, drone sales for now
A nonprofit is expected to file a legal challenge in an attempt to cancel the sale, started under the Trump administration.www.defensenews.com
|"....which includes 50 F-35s, 18 MQ–9B Reapers, as well as thousands of munitions and hundreds of missiles. The total sale comes with an estimated $23 billion price tag."|
In these difficult times $23 billion is a lot. (Also in the times before.) One of the reasons to think twice about the export of such advanced and sensitive equipment is that the technology can leak to other countries. But still, not exporting this equipment to UAE means that someone else will offer their stuff.
Thanks for the linkA solid overview from a YT channel that is beginning to impress me.
Certainly some solid information.
In recent interview about F-35's electronic and stealth capabilities, Lockheed's sales rep Scott Davis said that "F-35's jamming capability works through its AESA radar modules". F-35 doesn't have separate emitter for jammer (the fact that ASQ-239 is about 40kg lighter than for example ALQ-214 hints to this direction too). I suppose datalink and radio emitters could be, at least in theory, used to some very modest jamming abilities and there was a presentation which sort of hinted to this direction.Interesting little promo from LM here about the F35's EW capabilities. One of the criticisms leveled at the F35 by detractors like APA was that it lacked a towed decoy (then the AN/ALE-70 became public knowledge) and that its jamming capability was confined to the forward 120 degree arc covered by the APG-81 AESA, only within its native X-band. The clip below is the first piece of promotional material I have seen that explicitly depicts a 360 degree active emitting/jamming/EA capability, which would make sense if present.
Now, given that this is merely marketing material, it is obviously not safe to make any assumptions about what features are or are not present on the aircraft. Rather, my take-away is that it is never safe to make superficial assumptions about highly secretive systems, with the EW capabilities of a state-of-the-art stealth fighter being a prime example.
GE Aviation has wrapped up testing on its first XA100 prototype, an adaptive cycle engine.
An adaptive cycle engine is a novel turbine that can change air flow through three different air streams, depending on an aircraft’s need for efficiency or extra power. The US Air Force (USAF) has been funding development of the engine type since 2007.
Testing on the XA100 started in December 2020. The prototype showed performance and mechanical behaviour were consistent with pre-test predictions, says GE Aviation on 13 May. The engine met the USAF Adaptive Engine Transition Program (AETP) objectives, the company says.
“We were exceptionally pleased with how the engine performed throughout the test,” says David Tweedie, GE Edison Works’ general manager for advanced combat engines. “We’re looking forward to working with the Air Force and other stakeholders to identify the next steps toward bringing this revolutionary capability out of the test cell and into the hands of the warfighter.”
The USAF is interested in re-engining the Lockheed Martin F-35A stealth fighter with an adaptive engine to increase the aircraft’s 1,200nm (2,222km) range, which is viewed as too short for attacking targets within China. The fighter currently is powered by the Pratt & Whitney F135 turbine engine.
The claims are pretty amazing, if the MTBF can be managed. GE Aviation claims an adaptive cycle engine from AETP, could in the future, deliver to an aircraft, like the F-35A:Promising news on the propulsion front, with the XA100 making progress
Very impressive claims and hopefully realized in eventual production engines. Equally important is keeping all the extensive testing data and ceramics/manufacturing technology secure from the usual suspects. This research will keep the US in the military fast jet engine lead, probably one of the few truly significant advantages currently enjoyed by the USAF/USN.GE Aviation is desperate to have a product that can fight against Pratt & Whitney’s F135. Unfortunately, for the F-35 fleet, the Pratt & Whitney F135 engine is experiencing longer repair periods, and high temperatures that are producing cracks in turbine blades. In addition, maintainers are discovering “premature distress of rotor blade coatings” in a “small number” of engine power modules, creating more repair work and contributing to the backlog.
The claims are pretty amazing, if the MTBF can be managed. GE Aviation claims an adaptive cycle engine from AETP, could in the future, deliver to an aircraft, like the F-35A:
It is thought that additional cooling capacity could be useful for managing heat coming off directed energy weapons, such as lasers.
- a 50% improvement in loiter time,
- a 35% increase in range,
- a 25% reduction in fuel consumption,
- 10% increase in thrust, and 60% more heat absorption.
Part of that backlog is that the first block of F135 engines are already in shop for their 5 year overhaul on top of the other issues. With the USAF only having one facility operating to do all the work. According to February’s report on the issue they were also looking to add a second shift at the Tinker AFB F135 plant to try and double expected output starting next month. An engine shortage is the newest problem to hit the F-35 enterpriseGE Aviation is desperate to have a product that can fight against Pratt & Whitney’s F135. Unfortunately, for the F-35 fleet, the Pratt & Whitney F135 engine is experiencing longer repair periods, and high temperatures that are producing cracks in turbine blades. In addition, maintainers are discovering “premature distress of rotor blade coatings” in a “small number” of engine power modules, creating more repair work and contributing to the backlog.
The claims are pretty amazing, if the MTBF can be managed. GE Aviation claims an adaptive cycle engine from AETP, could in the future, deliver to an aircraft, like the F-35A:
It is thought that additional cooling capacity could be useful for managing heat coming off directed energy weapons, such as lasers.
- a 50% improvement in loiter time,
- a 35% increase in range,
- a 25% reduction in fuel consumption,
- 10% increase in thrust, and 60% more heat absorption.
The Air Force’s fighter fleet, led by the F-35A, turned in a better overall mission capable rate in 2020, even with limitations imposed by the pandemic, than it did in 2019, according to figures provided to Air Force Magazine. The F-35’s MC rates soared, and rates even improved for the F-15C, which the Air Force is anxious to divest because of its age. The F-15E’s MC rate declined, however.
Hmm, maybe they should install the probability drive and flux capacitor. That would cut down on the CPFH. IIRC the flux capacitor works best with dilithium crystals.There have been numerous complaints about the F-35’s CPFH. This article describes a “cost-per-effect” analysis to better judge the F-35 cost. It seems to be reasonable assuming the stealth capability remains viable. For low level threat environments, 4th Gen will
still be more cost effective.
U.S Navy F-35s Cost-per-Effect. How F-35s Save Money in Combat
By Kris Osborn - Warrior Maven (Washington, D.C.) During a Red Flag wargame exercise several years ago, a single F-35 was able to find, identify and destroy awarriormaven.com