F-16's done, What should PAF's next acquisition be?

Which one?

  • Rafales

    Votes: 15 57.7%
  • Eurofighter

    Votes: 5 19.2%
  • JSF

    Votes: 6 23.1%
  • F15E

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    26
Status
Not open for further replies.

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
srirangan said:
Should we strike it off our list here then? Or maybe there still is a possibility in the future? SABRE?
Rafale is still on the list, I asked after reading this news...dont no if there has been any move towards it. But as I said before, amongst all the other AirCrafts on the list, Mirage2000-9 seems to have become most favored.

France offered Mirage2000,5,9(choice between 2k,2k5 &2k9) & N. "N" version is nuke strike capable. Since its being offered in different varients, Mirages seem to be prefered most.

My Personal Opinion

I think Mirage2k9 will bought. The code of PAF & UAE is almost the same. What passes for one passes for other (modern UAE Air Force was established with the Help of PAF, hence both had similar tech demand). Since UAE is opperating on F-16s & Mirage2000-9, I believe both woll suit PAF as well.

Past experiance on Mirage-3 & 5 is also importent factor. It has been a success story.
 

adsH

New Member
srirangan said:
Should we strike it off our list here then? Or maybe there still is a possibility in the future? SABRE?
I would think this is a lure from the French, they are offering what Pakistan needs Nuke tech for Commercial Use power generation. Pak was recently denied help in this aspect from IAEA. By offering help in Space and Nuke Power area they are trying to get PAF to procure the Rafael. i'll be damed if they do. Yet again another example of french style of dealing.
 

rafale_2k5

New Member
It is ultimately goin to be M2k9 im pretty sure , no where has there been a mention of Rafale , even the ACM during his brief exposures to the media never hinted out at Rafale , which i believe is basically 4 two reasons , price vs capability, probably PAF is gonna customize all its block 52s 4 the air to air role whereas M2k9 would act as the multi role strike version!!!!!!! why hasnt rafale been included is simple probably AF doesnt want to wait tolo long for the multi role version to come out , besides they havent got the pocket to finance this versions R&D, on the other hand M2k9 utilizes most of Rafales technologies and is a proven/ tested platform!!!! if reports regarding PAF involvement with UAE mirages is true han definitely theyve got a fair idea about the capabilities of this aircraft, plus the fact that soe of PAFs pilots r flying these gives them the capability to have a good idea about performance parameters , plus the PAFs previous experience with the Mirage line would help their technical crews in transitioning to the newer types
 

kashifshahzad

Banned Member
rafale_2k5 said:
It is ultimately goin to be M2k9 im pretty sure , no where has there been a mention of Rafale , even the ACM during his brief exposures to the media never hinted out at Rafale , which i believe is basically 4 two reasons , price vs capability, probably PAF is gonna customize all its block 52s 4 the air to air role whereas M2k9 would act as the multi role strike version!!!!!!! why hasnt rafale been included is simple probably AF doesnt want to wait tolo long for the multi role version to come out , besides they havent got the pocket to finance this versions R&D, on the other hand M2k9 utilizes most of Rafales technologies and is a proven/ tested platform!!!! if reports regarding PAF involvement with UAE mirages is true han definitely theyve got a fair idea about the capabilities of this aircraft, plus the fact that soe of PAFs pilots r flying these gives them the capability to have a good idea about performance parameters , plus the PAFs previous experience with the Mirage line would help their technical crews in transitioning to the newer types
I agree with you Rafale_2k5

Was there a need for manufacturing Rafale when the Mirages were used by many nations and they were aware of its capebilities and the price of Rafale is also very high

One man can understand that there is a big difference between the Mig's and Sukhoi's but what is the major differnece between the Rafales and Mirages
 

aaaditya

New Member
well rafale is atwin engined aircraft (thus having greater survivability) it is heavier and can carry a heavier weapon load,i beleive it also has a larger combat radius than the mirage 2000-5,rafale can be used on board the carriers,twin engine aircrafts are better suited for maritime operations than single engined aircrafts(usa uses the f-18 and the f-14 and india has placed orders for mig29k), i beleive mirage cannot be used on carriers or for maritime strike role as of now.:coffee
 

BilalK

New Member
Pakistan does not have an aircraft carrier, Pakistan is a third of the size of India, and planes like F-16 Block-52 and Mirage 2000-9 are extremely potent for a relatively thin country like Pakistan. PAF Mirage ROSE aircraft do maritime operations, as well as surgical strike, reconnaissance, etc. Replacing them with the much more advanced Mirage 2000-9 would help the PAF a million, and in addition adding a large number of F-16C/D Block-52s and F-16A/B MLUs, as well as a large number of JF-17s. This is certainly no joke for India, and if you ask me, the number of advanced fighters falls quite even!

According to a Jang report, the PAF wants 71 new fighters in addition the 55-75 F-16C/D Block-52s, among the new options would obviously be more advanced F-16s, JAS-39 Gripens, and Mirage 2000-9s. I also think Mirage 2000-9 will be sought, so we're talking something like 40-71 Mirage 2000-9s, 55-75 F-16C/D Block-52s, 150 JF-17s, and 32 F-16A/B MLUs.
 
Last edited:

P.A.F

New Member
i have read somewhere that if everything goes to plan then the first NEW F-16 will be delivered in 2008. so by then the JF-17 will start rolling in:)
 

adsH

New Member
BilalK said:
so we're talking something like 40-71 Mirage 2000-9s, 55-75 F-16C/D Block-52s, 150 JF-17s, and 32-111 F-16A/B MLUs.
Just to correct you slightly there, the MLU F-16 would add up to the total 111 F-16 which would consist of the newer built Block 52. they don't have plans on acquiring more then the stated 111 F-16 (As of Right now).
 

BilalK

New Member
My bad, thanks adsH, I edited my post.

From 2008 the PAF will be taking delivery of a lot of things, new F-16s, new JF-17s, AEW&Cs, and other goodies.
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
The number of F-16s may rise from 111 since US is offering free F-16s. We can keep some F-16s which are not MLU for training & other purposes like escort missions or patrol & recon.

Mirage2000-9, if they r going to come they wont be more than 40 or 50.
 

adsH

New Member
SABRE said:
The number of F-16s may rise from 111 since US is offering free F-16s. We can keep some F-16s which are not MLU for training & other purposes like escort missions or patrol & recon.

Mirage2000-9, if they r going to come they wont be more than 40 or 50.
But you know what Sabre its worth getting MLU's you can keep them longer in your inventory (Compared to Getting them straight off the Bone yard) Similar configuration to the Active front line F-16 and you'd spend less on the actual Maintenance since its gone through a massive Upgrade.
 

P.A.F

New Member
well the f-16s PAF getting for free (What sabre says) should be taken. it is PAF's responsibility to get them MLUed with their own money. Pakistan can't just have everything given too us on a plate.
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
New info;

Its not 32 PAF F-16 Block 15A/B that are to be MLUed...its 39. The 7 broken one are to be re-built...We will give 39 for MLU & recieve the origional number of 40. 40th unit would be a gift probably from the inventory of Block 15 & 32 that are for free to Pakistan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top