Use statistic and you find what it was tens of thousands under Saddam regime for 25 years. Unless, of course, you want to include dead in Iran-Iraq war.
Just in 4 years USA presence where are indeed hundreds of thousands dead.
I already gave you examples about USSR occuping USA. "Americans killing americans!!!" - how it sounds? It is always like that in civil war. But civil war IS CAUSED DIRECTLY BY USA ACTIONS. t
Thats why USA is quilty.
Tens of thousands iraqis die directly from USA weapons when american soldiers fight back "rebels". Of course, USA soldiers dont want more civil deads. Of course, they do all they can to avoid casualities. But such is nature of the war - civilians DIE. I dont have simple answer what should be done NOW, with all big mess USA caused. Pulling out will not reduce casualities. The main mistake was done 4 years ago, when USA atacked Iraq. We shouldnt let that happend again with other country.
Kim also earned his money within his society rules. May be NK society rules are less advanced than USA society rules - but that still dont give right to kill NK peoples. Moreover, in the case of Kim he just recived all the power & money from his parents just as, funny, Bush recived power & money from his parents.
But its YOU suggesting to Kim to dontate all HIS money to poor NK childrens, no?
He earns his money under flawed western society rules - just as, for example, slave user legitimately earned his money from slave work 300 years ago. Note, slave user itself is not quilty in slavery - he just live in such time and use all means to prosper. But we all know what slavery is BAD. I'm sure, in 200 years everyone will know what current western form of capitalism where some peoples posses billions but
some starving is BAD.
What i mean? Kim lives under different society rules. We should try to change these rules, and NOT try to hurt simple peoples under Kim regime by locking legitimately earned NK moneys.
GB Queen "co-opted the GB treasury and lives like a king while the GB people starve". Make about as much sence. There is no doubt what Queen recive money from goverment. There is not doubt some peoples in GB starve or overwise lack money to survive (medical care, etc). Where is no doubt Bush alone spend 100 times on his luxury item than Kim, not to tell about other USA magnates. And what?
Just understand it - NK have DIFFERENT society. In that society goods are distributed not throught owned property like Wallmart, Ford or Microsoft - but throught peoples place in NK govement hiearchy. Both approaches can work better or worse. For example, many African/ Latain Amercan countries are poor and starve despite being fully capitalistic.
Partially, sanction are responsible. It is not only direct deny of selling/buying same goods, but also agressive sanctions against own and foreign companies what want to do business with NK.
For the most part yes. Still, i see no point making NK peoples lives worse.
Believe me, in 200 years peoples will wonder same thing about current USA regime and current West Europe regime. While currently they have best form of society around - it is still not flawless.
Last edited:
