who do you think put them there?hey guys interesting news article,as many as 50 live rockets have been discovered in indian waters of the south coast.
here check out this link and article:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=7997
RAMANATHAPURAM: The police will seek the help of Indian Navy for the safe disposal of a large number of live rocket shells, which were reportedly found off the coast of Rameswaram by fishermen.
According to information available with the State and Central intelligence agencies operating from Rameswaram and Ramanathapuram, fishermen of Rameswaram netted more than 50 live rocket shells in the Indian waters during the last 15 days.Instead of handing them over to the security agencies, the fishermen threw away the rockets fearing "harassment" in the name of investigation. However, the fishermen are worried that their lives would be in danger if the rockets go off.
Sense of fear
A fisherman on anonymity said that netting live rocket shells had become the order of the day. A large number of rocket shells are said to have been found between the third islet and sixth islet. This has created a sense of fear among fishermen, who use this route for fishing.
The Superintendent of Police, R. Thirugnanam, told The Hindu that he would officially ask the higher authorities of the Navy to recover the `reported' rocket shells. Though the issue was discussed orally, an official letter would be sent to the Naval authorities to take appropriate action. He said the Naval authorities were examining the three rocket shells, which were seized last month.
most probably the l.t.t.e (the liberation tigers of tamil ealam),they must have been trying to smuggle these weapons into srilanka ,but must have been forced to throw them overboard by the preasure from indian coast guard.who do you think put them there?
There is an image of the Falcon class corvette on page 6 in the following link:hey guys,does anyone have images and specifications of the falcon class of corvettes and the sigma class of corvettes?
I thought indonesia was biulding the sigma corvettes?hey guys,does anyone have images and specifications of the falcon class of corvettes and the sigma class of corvettes?
Sigma and the "national corvette programme" which is supposed to be based on Fincantieri Comandanti class OPVH.I thought indonesia was biulding the sigma corvettes?
did't they say a while back that barak intercepted 12 out of 14 times? How come they now changed it to every time. That's interesting.hey guys ,great news,indian navy plans to acquire more barak missiles for its frontline warships.
here check out this link and article:
http://www.ndtv.com/morenews/showmo...&slug=Navy+wants+more+Barak+missiles&id=99028
When Pakistan bought the Harpoon anti-ship missile in the mid-nineties that could target Indian ships from 150 km away, the Indian navy chose the Israeli Barak air defence missile.
But the Barak missile deal is at the centre of a controversy after the CBI chargesheeted former defence minister George Fernandes. The CBI accused Fernandes of buying the Barak instead of the indigenously produced Trishul.
In the middle is the navy, which is desperate that its air defence requirements do not become hostage to the controversy.
A K Antony was shown a live fire exercise of the Barak missile. The defence minister seemed happy with the display.
"It was the most thrilling day of my life. It was amazing," said Antony.
DRDO's Trishul air defence missile has not even had a successful test flight yet.
Cutting edge technology
The navy wanted the new defense minister to realise that the Barak is essential for it to protect its capital ships and that the Barak is cutting edge technology in air defence missiles.
"Well we have tested it 14 times and have hit the bulls eye each time. This is the best anti-missile defence system that is available," said Admiral Sureesh Mehta, Navy Chief.
For the navy, the DRDO built Trishul anti-missile system is not something they are waiting for. The Barak is their answer to Pakistan's acquisition of the sea skimming Harpoon missile.
At present eight ships use the Barak and the navy wants many more to follow.
During testing, Barak is always launched in pairs. On two occasions, one of the missile failed to intercept the target, but second missile destroyed the target. So the test is a success, Target was destroyed in all 14 tests.did't they say a while back that barak intercepted 12 out of 14 times? How come they now changed it to every time. That's interesting.
the first 2 tests were failures due to integration failures ,but the subsequent fourteen tests have been successfull,indian navy has also selected the elta-el/m-2248 mf-star s band 4 faced radars for their p17 class of stealth frigates(according to the force magazine).did't they say a while back that barak intercepted 12 out of 14 times? How come they now changed it to every time. That's interesting.
I am impressed by the continual expansion of the Indian Navy. At the present rate of growth in practically every warship category it seems to me that India is fast heading towards becoming a naval superpower.Navy to take charge of USS Trenton
New Delhi, January 16, 2007
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1902061,0008.htm
The US Navy will hand over USS Trenton, an amphibious transport warship, to the Indian Navy at Norfolk, Virginia on Wednesday.
The Rs 215-crore warship, which will be India's second-largest vessel after aircraft carrier INS Viraat, comes with a fleet of six Seaking utility helicopters, which cost Rs 175 crore.
A crew of more than 300 Indian Navy personnel has been training in Norfolk since August last to take charge of Trenton.
Formally called a landing platform dock of LPD, it will be the first American-made vessel to join the Indian Navy. It will set sail for India around mid-2007 and will be berthed at the navy's new base at Karwar in Karnataka.
Being bought under a US Foreign Military Sales (FMS) programme, the 173-metre vessel can carry around 900 troops and 110 military vehicles.
In Indian Navy service, the Trenton will be renamed INS Jalashva, which is Sanskrit for seahorse. The navy had recently commissioned INS Shardul, a landing ship tank (LST), at the Karwar base to enhance its amphibious capability. It is set to add two more Shardul class ships to its fleet by the end of this year.
U.S. Navy Decoms Trenton, Transfers to Indian Navy
Story Number: NNS070117-15
Release Date: 1/17/2007 6:26:00 PM
By Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Tyler Jones, Fleet Public Affairs Center Atlantic
NORFOLK, Va. (NNS) -- The amphibious transport dock ship USS Trenton (LPD 14), was decommissioned Jan. 17 in a ceremony at Naval Station Norfolk. Immediately following the decommissioning, Trenton was recommissioned and transferred to the Indian Navy, bearing the name INS Jalashwa.
The event marks the first time a U.S. Navy vessel has been transferred to the Indian navy.
“Trenton will continue to serve all the free nations of the world, just as she served the United States, as we expand ‘the 1,000-ship navy,’” said Rear Adm. Garry Hall, Commander, Amphibious Group 2.
In recent months, the crew of Trenton has been working alongside Indian sailors, training them to operate the ship efficiently and safely.
The commanding officer of Jalashwa, Indian Navy Capt. B.S. Ahluwalia, expressed his gratitude to the crew of Trenton, and praised their professionalism.
“Today’s transfer is a significant event in the growing relationship between our two countries and our two navies,” said Ahluwalia.
Commissioned in March 1971, Trenton took part in numerous humanitarian operations, including the evacuations of American civilians from Liberia in 1996 and from Lebanon in 2006. In addition, in 1991, Trenton was responsible for evacuating the U.S. and Soviet ambassadors and 193 foreign nationals from Somalia.
During Trenton’s final deployment, the ship took part in maritime security operations off the Somali coast of eastern Africa.
Trenton’s commanding officer, Cmdr. Samuel Norton, spoke proudly and fondly of his crew and time aboard the ship, saying that without such an outstanding crew, Trenton would not have been the same.
“It’s people that have made Trenton what she is today, and its people that will keep the memory of Trenton alive,” Norton said.
Trenton employed a crew of approximately 415 Sailors and could embark nearly 1,000 Marines.
The ship was a member of the Austin-class amphibious transport dock ship. The ship is 570 feet in length and displaces approximately 17,000 tons when fully loaded. The Austin-class currently is being replaced by the newer, more-modern San Antonio-class LPD.
For related news, visit the Commander, Naval Surface Force, Atlantic Fleet Navy NewsStand page at http://www.news.navy.mil/local/surflant/.