Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates

Richo99

Active Member
Not surprised, when they were purchased the USAF was planning on operating them, but cancelled their order not long after they entered service with the RAAF.

IIP does say they will be replaced, but not what with.
Finally got around to reading the IIP and the NDS. Was interesting to note that whilst the IIP just states that the c27 will be replaced, the NDS specifically says it will be replaced by a "commercial aircraft fleet to support personnel and logistics transport across the Pacific." Sounds very much like this aircraft doesn't have a frontline / wartime role of any description
 

Tbone

Active Member
Would the retirement of the spartan and the replacement being a commercial aircraft as stated by defence. Would this purely mean a new type of commercial aircraft is to be acquired by the RAAF or will this be contracted out?
I hope it’s a new acquisition and something like atr 72 600 is looked at. What would be other realistic aircraft operating in the region with the support set up for lost cost operations and parts etc.
 

MARKMILES77

Well-Known Member
Boeing Defence has revealed their new version of the JDAM, the JDAM-LR.
It was created by adding a Technical Directions TDI-185 turbine to the standard JDAM-ER.
The project was a collaboration between Boeing Defense and Ferra Engineering Australia.
The addition of the turbine increases the range of the standard JDAM-ER by 200 Nautical Miles,
meaning it should have a range of around 450km.
It has already been sucessfully test fired from Super Hornets.
This has to be a no brainer for manufacture in Australia as part of the GWEO.
Australia already manufactures the 500Ib bombs and Ferra makes the wing kits in Australia.
The cost is likely a fraction of the cost of a cruise missile with similiar capability such as JASSM.

Screenshot 2026-04-22 at 14.24.06.png
Screenshot 2026-04-22 at 14.44.46.png
 

SamB

Member
Boeing Defence has revealed their new version of the JDAM, the JDAM-LR.
It was created by adding a Technical Directions TDI-185 turbine to the standard JDAM-ER.
The project was a collaboration between Boeing Defense and Ferra Engineering Australia.
The addition of the turbine increases the range of the standard JDAM-ER by 200 Nautical Miles,
meaning it should have a range of around 450km.
It has already been sucessfully test fired from Super Hornets.
This has to be a no brainer for manufacture in Australia as part of the GWEO.
Australia already manufactures the 500Ib bombs and Ferra makes the wing kits in Australia.
The cost is likely a fraction of the cost of a cruise missile with similiar capability such as JASSM.

View attachment 54725
View attachment 54726
Red Bull gives you wings. But Rum gives you 4x4 wheel drive.
 

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
Are we going to resurrect the GAF Nomad?

Cheers S. :)
Funny you should say that, GippsAero own the Type Certificate so never say never.

Something like a Cessna Caravan or Twin Otter would probably be ideal, especially if you operate them as spokes into remote areas with C-130's or A330's flying into the nearest large airport.

You can put floats onto both the Caravan or Twin Otter if required as well.
 

south

Well-Known Member
Boeing Defence has revealed their new version of the JDAM, the JDAM-LR.
It was created by adding a Technical Directions TDI-185 turbine to the standard JDAM-ER.
The project was a collaboration between Boeing Defense and Ferra Engineering Australia.
The addition of the turbine increases the range of the standard JDAM-ER by 200 Nautical Miles,
meaning it should have a range of around 450km.
It has already been sucessfully test fired from Super Hornets.
This has to be a no brainer for manufacture in Australia as part of the GWEO.
Australia already manufactures the 500Ib bombs and Ferra makes the wing kits in Australia.
The cost is likely a fraction of the cost of a cruise missile with similiar capability such as JASSM.

View attachment 54725
View attachment 54726
Let’s be careful with words. JASSM family bring a 1000lb class penetrating warhead wiith terminal aimpoint selection in a LO survivable body.

the other brings low cost, standoff and mass.

Not at all similar, but I’d argue very complimentary capabilities.
 

ADMk2

Just a bloke
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Boeing Defence has revealed their new version of the JDAM, the JDAM-LR.
It was created by adding a Technical Directions TDI-185 turbine to the standard JDAM-ER.
The project was a collaboration between Boeing Defense and Ferra Engineering Australia.
The addition of the turbine increases the range of the standard JDAM-ER by 200 Nautical Miles,
meaning it should have a range of around 450km.
It has already been sucessfully test fired from Super Hornets.
This has to be a no brainer for manufacture in Australia as part of the GWEO.
Australia already manufactures the 500Ib bombs and Ferra makes the wing kits in Australia.
The cost is likely a fraction of the cost of a cruise missile with similiar capability such as JASSM.

View attachment 54725
View attachment 54726
JASSM and JDAM are complimentary, not “similar” capabilities.

Their commonality is in delivering HE to a certain distance.

But lets not pretend a JDAM with a motor in anyway compares to the capability a low observable cruise missile brings.
 

MARKMILES77

Well-Known Member
south
Not at all similar, but I’d argue very complimentary capabilities.
JASSM and JDAM are complimentary, not “similar” capabilities.
JASSM and JDAM-LR are both air-launched, winged, turbine powered, subsonic, precision-guided munitions with the ability to maneuvre in flight path and altitude and both with large warheads, designed for standoff strike at a range of roughly 450kms.
But I get your point that they have no similarities.
 

ADMk2

Just a bloke
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
JASSM and JDAM-LR are both air-launched, winged, turbine powered, subsonic, precision-guided munitions with the ability to maneuvre in flight path and altitude and both with large warheads, designed for standoff strike at a range of roughly 450kms.
But I get your point that they have no similarities.
JDAM does not have the ability to maneuver in flight, the wings are for range, not agility.

It is not autonomous, does not used advanced routing, nor EW resistant guidance methods, it does not employ your “tactically adept” description of it’s flight profile, nor are they LO or networked weapon systems.

But nice try conflating…
 

Murse

New Member
Funny you should say that, GippsAero own the Type Certificate so never say never.

Something like a Cessna Caravan or Twin Otter would probably be ideal, especially if you operate them as spokes into remote areas with C-130's or A330's flying into the nearest large airport.

You can put floats onto both the Caravan or Twin Otter if required as well.
When we saw they were returning Spartan, I started writing a post advocating for 208 floatplanes for Army to operate in the littoral. I deleted it for fear of ridicule

I do believe they could play a vital role in that environment, especially in AME.
 

Maranoa

Active Member
I'm with you on the Caravan 208 type, maybe even the NZ made PAC 750. Nobody can predict where the Australian Army will have to operate and why. Tell me anyone saw Somalia, Rwanda, Timor or Solomon Island gigs coming, let alone almost 20 years in Afghanistan and Iraq. I've got no problem with the focused force concept for a war of national survival with the CCP, but we can't ignore the other very high likelihood scenarios like communal war in the PNG/Solomons/Timor/Younameit local shithole where getting troops in and wounded out is a nightmare not solved by a handful of Chinooks.
 

MARKMILES77

Well-Known Member
JDAM does not have the ability to maneuver in flight, the wings are for range, not agility.

It is not autonomous, does not used advanced routing, nor EW resistant guidance methods, it does not employ your “tactically adept” description of it’s flight profile, nor are they LO or networked weapon systems.

But nice try conflating…
Wrong.
Screenshot 2026-04-24 at 08.19.01.png

Screenshot 2026-04-24 at 08.23.29.png

Screenshot 2026-04-24 at 08.31.36.png

 
Last edited:

PHOTOGRAPHER

New Member
Dont understand the angst here. Its pretty obvious these 2 weapons have some similarities. Yes, one is certainly better than the other but similarities remain. I would love to see Australia adding this new variant to our GWEO porfolio.
 

Morgo

Well-Known Member
That's quite the capability. As others have noted, not a replacement for JASSM by a long shot, but an impressive capability nonetheless. And at perhaps 10% to 20% the cost could be useful in places where mass is needed.

I wonder if they will be integrated on to P8s....... 11 of these would ruin anyone's day.
 

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
I'm with you on the Caravan 208 type, maybe even the NZ made PAC 750. Nobody can predict where the Australian Army will have to operate and why. Tell me anyone saw Somalia, Rwanda, Timor or Solomon Island gigs coming, let alone almost 20 years in Afghanistan and Iraq. I've got no problem with the focused force concept for a war of national survival with the CCP, but we can't ignore the other very high likelihood scenarios like communal war in the PNG/Solomons/Timor/Younameit local shithole where getting troops in and wounded out is a nightmare not solved by a handful of Chinooks.
The light turboprop’s are cheap enough to own and operate that you could probably justify them completely just for HADR and training.

The Caravan or Kodak are probably going to be a better option then the PAC because they are high wing and would have better downwards vision? There are also more of them around, so support in remote area’s is likely easier.
 
Top