@Meriv90 You been them them Italian grapes again? Didn't your mama tell you that it was bad for you and make you forgetful? Or is that marriage, I can never remember which. Anyway you forgot to comment after the copy and paste. Do it again and the moderators might have to put you on a diet of English food and wine.The ROK Navy found defects in the cables of the inverter module, one of the central components in the propulsion system, aboard ROKS Son Won-il, ROKS Yoon Bong-gil, and ROKS Yoo Gwan-soon. These are the first, fifth, and sixth boats of the class. Each submarine will have to go through a complex overhaul to receive repairs. This will immobilize each vessel at least four months.
To make matters worse, the inverter modules, produced by Siemens, cannot be fixed in Korean shipyards due to legal barriers concerning technology transfers and intellectual property. Therefore, the parts will need to be shipped to Germany for repairs, with the round way trip expected to last 2 months, leading to each submarine being out of action for at least 6 months.
Some merit in a CATOBAR alternative like Hawkeye, F-35C as addition to navalized KF-21s and acquisition of MQ-25s (last item probably unlikely). Is the carrier project something SK needs or is it a counter to Japanese naval aviation efforts?View attachment 49483
Some Korean defense analyst seems trying to argue instead going with F-35B, better to build the capacity of CVX with KF-21 navalised version. This's coming from article in Bemil Chosun.
The image seems building something closer to what French has in mind. Double catapults CATOBAR. This argument if I read basically base on developing KF-21 navalised version will be more beneficial then F-35B. Off course this in fact increase the dimensions on previous design that utilise 20 F-35B.
한국형 경항모 보완 필요성과 방향
1. 서 언1945.11.11.일 한국 해군의 모체인 해방병단이 창설되었다. 창설 당시 창설의 주역들은 변변한 전투함 한 척 없었지만 그들의......bemil.chosun.com
Longer term though, such an acquisition (providing that relevant CONOPS are also developed) could be wise for S. Korea. Right now the forces are all based around conflict with N. Korea, but there absolutely potential for S. Korea to come into conflict with other nations that are in eastern Asia. Such a conflict could involve access to rawmats and nat resources, but also SLOC to and from the region. AFAIK S. Korea, much like the PRC and Japan, do not possess much in the way of petroleum and are dependent on imports, much of which has to cross the SCS. Should any nation decide to declare the SCS as theirs, a S. Korean naval TF including a carrier would provide a broader range of options than just land-based maritime patrol/strike aircraft.I think it's largely a national pride thing. If Japan can build aircraft carriers, so can we! The CONOPS seems rather vague. I can see a use, though: an airfield that's harder to hit by N. Korean missiles than those on land in S. Korea. Buying F-35B for land basing might provide a similar ability for less money, though.
All true but let’s face it, PRC is the problem for SCS access. While carriers might provide important defence options, SKorea and Japan getting on the same page would be just, if not more, important. Perhaps today’s sad even in Japan could be the start for smoothing out relations.Longer term though, such an acquisition (providing that relevant CONOPS are also developed) could be wise for S. Korea. Right now the forces are all based around conflict with N. Korea, but there absolutely potential for S. Korea to come into conflict with other nations that are in eastern Asia. Such a conflict could involve access to rawmats and nat resources, but also SLOC to and from the region. AFAIK S. Korea, much like the PRC and Japan, do not possess much in the way of petroleum and are dependent on imports, much of which has to cross the SCS. Should any nation decide to declare the SCS as theirs, a S. Korean naval TF including a carrier would provide a broader range of options than just land-based maritime patrol/strike aircraft.
It's a guided 70 mm (2.75 in) folding fin aerial rocket with an imagining infrared seeker. Similar to the laser guided to DAGR, APKWS and GATR, just not requiring the target to be "painted"It wasn't clear in this article what kind of weapon this actually is.
LIG Nex1 showcases K-LOGIR Rocket at RIMPAC 2022 - Naval News
South Korean defense company LIG Nex1 is showcasing its “Poniard” Korean-Low cOst Guided Imaging Rocket (K-LOGIR) at Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) 2022. LIG Nex1 hopes that this will open up more export opportunities for the platform in the future.www.navalnews.com
But it seems to be a "Guided weapon that precisely strikes multiple LCACs(Landing Craft, Air Cushion) of
enemy landing on the coast at high speed".
According to LIG Nex1, the creator of “Poniard” Korean-Low cOst Guided Imaging Rocket (K-LOGIR).
It seems that funding for CVX, the country’s aircraft carrier program, has been axed in the 2023 national defense budget.
The Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo reported that CVX is facing a re-evaluation and there are even rumours that It looks as if the CVX program will be canceled.
CVX reportedly left out of South Korea's 2023 Defense Budget - Naval News
Dong-A Ilbo, a major South Korean newspaper, reported on August 26th that funding for CVX, the country’s aircraft carrier program, has been axed in the 2023 national defense budget.www.navalnews.com