South Korean Navy

koxinga

Well-Known Member
Leonardo doesn't seem to have sold any Vixen 500Es for a few years, & I've not found it on Leonardo's web pages. If you want an AESA radar for lightweight fighters, armed trainers, & the like, Grifo E seems to be the current offer. Grifo E
Curious no?

Whether Vixen 500 or Grifo E, Leonardo has their own products in this category (e.g AESA light fighter radar) and the value proposition that Hanwha brings to the table, at least on the IP/technology side is not obvious to me.

This market is also getting increasingly crowded, with Polish and Malaysian F/A-50 reportedly choosing Raytheon's Phantomstrike AESA radar, while Hanwha's domestic competitor, LIG Nex1 offering their ESR-500A for the F/A-50 as well.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
End last month Hyundai Heavy Industries presented the basic design of the new KDDX-design. According to HD HHI, its capabilities are on par with the ROK Navy’s most advanced destroyer equipped with the Aegis Combat System, the ‘King Jeong-jo the Great’ (KDX-III Batch-II), and full with indigenous content. No information is given about the displacement and size in this article, but other sources are telling that this KDDX-design will be between KDX-II and KDX-III.
The total cost of the program is estimated at 5,8 billion USD, with plans for the acquisition of six vessels by the Republic of Korea (ROK) Navy by 2036.

 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
South-Korean Hyundai Heavy Industries has agreed to jointly pursue the development of submarines designed for overseas export with Babcock from the UK.

The development of the export-submarine, which is under 3000 tons, was already started last year by HD Hyundai Heavy Industries. It is expected to be equipped with Babcock’s proven Weapon Handling and Launch System (WHLS).
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group


ROK after several years debating on building ABM capabilities, decide to procure SM-3 with ABM capabilities. The missiles will be equiped their latest Aegis Destroyer KDX-III Batch II. Their decision to finally build their own ABM capabilities, seem after calculation that DPRK ballistic missile development already large enough to merit ROK having front line ABM within their own military.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
This article discusses a SSN option for South Korea. The would likely freak out China and NK. Japan may be considering this option as well, despite having the best SSK in the world (IMHO). SK is already promoting SSKs for Canada and a co-operative program for SSNs isn't totally impossible. Any increase in SSN production is the best way to counter the ever increasing threat of China's rapidly expanding surface fleet.

Supporting South Korea’s Nuclear Submarine Aspirations | RealClearDefense
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
This article discusses a SSN option for South Korea. The would likely freak out China and NK. Japan may be considering this option as well, despite having the best SSK in the world (IMHO). SK is already promoting SSKs for Canada and a co-operative program for SSNs isn't totally impossible. Any increase in SSN production is the best way to counter the ever increasing threat of China's rapidly expanding surface fleet.

Supporting South Korea’s Nuclear Submarine Aspirations | RealClearDefense
It will be interesting to see how South-Korea wants to achieve this. Totally/more or less independently like India and china or in cooperation with another country like Brazil.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
There are some in ROK want US to give them similar access on Submarine Nuclear tech as what US give to Australia under AUKUS. However I also read some ROK pundits that believe they can go more independently, and only need some nuclear submarine integration design help from US.

India Arihant eventough build independently, however India has years of experience running SSN by leasing from Russia. This no surprise that Arihant incorporate that. In sense India can be said semi-independent in reaching Nuclear Submarine stage. Brazil will have big help from French on the design and integration of Nuclear reactor operation and safety. However the reactor is Brazil build and design.

ROK and Japan all have advance capabilities on designing their own nuclear reactor. Thus if Brazil can churn out their own compact reactor for Submarine, both ROK and Japan can do that. It will take more political will by Japan political establishment and public to go with SSN. However if ROK goes that path, Japan will most likely intensified moving that direction also. Something that CCP will not like it.

Still using their latest SSK as base, I do believe will be suitable move to goes independently. Frenchie using their SSK as base for their first SSN, and both KSS3 and Taigei definitely suitable enough as base. It is just matter of Political will to churn out compact reactor for their own SSN, and definitely within reach of both nation Nuclear Industry.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
As I have mentioned on other naval threads, the rapid advances in missile technologies makes one wonder about the survival of expensive surface ships. I realize layered defence assets are supposedly capable of defending surface ships but against saturation missile attacks…..? Then there is the reloading issue. Little wonder there is significant growth the SSK fleets around the world and certainly SSNs have important advantages. Subs may not have the versatility of surface ships but stealth and survivability may be the key features that matter.

How many SSNs could be obtained in lieu of one Ford class CVN? Currently the US naval nuclear supply base has to support CVN and SSN. Would throwing all resources into SSNs lead to better output and support? Would Japan and/or South Korea added to the supply chain help AUKUS?
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
Some news from South-Korea.

Hanwha Ocean has announced that it had been selected as the preferred bidder in the 2nd phase of the AOE-II Shipbuilding Project launched by the Republic of Korea’s Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA).

The Soyang-class fast combat support ship (AOE-II) is the ROK Navy’s latest logistics support vessel, capable of supplying ammunition, cargo, and fuel to ships in operation while at sea, with a displacement of 10.000 tons (light load), a length of 190 meters, a maximum speed of 24 knots, and a crew of 140.




South-Korea will also build a new 6150-ton large test vessel. The large test vessel announced by the Agency for Defense Development (ADD) is a multi-purpose special vessel designed to serve as a platform for testing next-generation missiles, as well as for conducting capability measurements and development tests for high-altitude interceptors and flight vehicles.

 

Ananda

The Bunker Group


First KDX-III batch 2 Aegis Destroyer being commission by ROKN. Officially call Jeongjo The Great class Destroyers. Interesting Hyundai also got representative from Morroco, Peru, Thailand, and Chile. Indicating those countries have shown serious interest to Hyundai build Naval vessels.

Add:

Xavier interview on the KDX-III Batch 2 commission ceremony.
 
Last edited:
Top