From Infoglobal FB (Indonesian Avionics company). This's already couple days old, but only got time to uploaded in here. This's from this company booth during local Defense Equipment exhibition in MinDef three days ago.
Some information have been put on this thread on this company. Basically this's the leading avionics company in Indonesia. Their avionics products has been used in Hawk 200/100 of TNI-AU and according to their info also RMAF Hawk. They also got contract for Avionics on other TNI-AU aircraft modifications program like with C-130H and recently involved with DI to upgrade basic N219 toward MPA function.
In their booth they shown some models/mock-up of UCAV and Fighters they're proposed to be developing toward end of this decade. The UCAV model in the left and Fighter in the right shown similarities with what KAI developing. However in middle is bit different.
What I'm going to bring up in here, is the problem of 'consistencies' on defense tech and equipment development program. Years ago in this thread, I already shown that SBY administration decided to work with ROK/KAI on KFX toward giving DI learning curve and exposures on Fighter design and manufacturing management process. They also practically choose ROK as major Partner on defense industry development.
Thus there's no illusion on that. Working with ROK is part of learning curve on Fighter development, and not developing Indonesia own fighter. 20% participation means the Fighters is Korean project and Indonesia is junior partner (that basically only going to licensing). Thus it's not Indigenous Fighter program, and anyone that thinking otherwise is just kidding themselves.
However even with that Junior status, there's still question whether Indonesia will in the end going to keep that 20% commitment. Despite all recent talk, for me is always 'folow the money trail'. If Indonesia MinDef committed themselves toward expensive Fighters like Rafale or F-15EX, then just in previous posts, where's the money coming from, for Fighters development ?
For me, what this company shown in their booth, shown the development path for Fighters that's being talk as Political idea, still not clear on how to implement that. The ambiguity on the path still there, including what actually really want to gain by participating as 20% junior partner in KFX.
This administration now seems try to bring French as major Partner in defense industry development replacing ROK. I got sense Politically the choice of French as partner will be more interesting within this administration rather then ROK. Not a problem on that, but will that change if new administration come after 2024?
That's what I'm putting the problem in Indonesia. The changes of plan that making any long term plan going to be moot in the end. Even if they manage to inject money for that 20% share in KFX program, there's no guarantee they or the next administration will commit themselves on manufacturing IFX locally. There's no indication that they will inject more money toward DI after N219 for N250 (CN-235 civilian rendering), let alone this IFX.
So if this company somehow manage to convince present administration on developing 'their' fighters model design, is this means the experience with KAI on KFX will stop after prototype development stage ? Indonesia then used other partner (perhaps French) toward development of Indonesia own design?
Yugoslavia before broke up already talking with French/Dasault to help them with Novi Avion (which some model rendering shown design of one engine Rafale). Are that kind of path being choose ?
Whatever the path being choose the most important is continue commitment on the program. Whatever the path being choose (could be licensing Rafale or KF-21) or goes on to Indonesia own design, all need money and Political support for long term.
That's what always the problem in Indonesia especially after Soeharto's time. Long term Political path is something that very hard to continue being support.