Some relevant updates from the region after the 8 Jan 2020 missile strike and disagreeing on a conceptual point
1. Major General Qassem Soleimani, former head of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force, prior time his assassination, was feared at home and abroad. He held both symbolic and substantive authority. Also, while technically serving under the commander-in-chief of the IRGC, he often eclipsed those at the highest ranks of Iran’s Praetorian Guard. See:
The Hill:
Soleimani's death creates power vacuum within Iran. While after Soleimani’s death the supreme leader said the Quds Force’s mission “is the same as it was under” his commandership, three areas to watch will be:
(i) the status of the Quds Force within the IRGC’s top brass;
(ii) the Ayatollah’s decision-making circle; and
(iii) Iran’s Foreign Ministry’s attempts to assert more control over regional foreign policy.
2. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani lashed out at the US and Europe in a televised speech on state TV. Rouhani slammed the EU’s “failure to keep it promises” under the 2015 nuclear deal and blamed the U.S. for making the Middle East insecure. See:
CNBC: ‘Danger tomorrow’: Iran’s Rouhani makes veiled threat to US and EU troops in Middle East. Further, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s decision to speak at Friday prayers (17 Jan 2020) shows how seriously the Iranian authorities take local reaction to the accidental downing of a Ukrainian passenger jet. See:
NBC:
Iran's Ayatollah praises strikes on U.S. bases in rare address.
3. The 82nd Airborne Division is briefing family members of deployed paratroopers to double-check their social media settings and report any strange messages they may receive after some malevolent ones were reported to the command. The division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team deployed to Kuwait in early January as part of an emergency response to the region over heightened tensions with Iran. “Families have reported instances where they have received unsolicited contact with some menacing messaging,” said Lt. Col. Mike Burns, a division spokesman. See:
Military Times: Families of deployed paratroopers received ‘menacing’ messages, warned to double-check social media settings.
I, too, think it's a fake. But fakes like this become more common and believable when the US isn't entirely forthcoming with what actually happened.
4. I disagree — let me explain the conceptual difference (and stop here to avoid going further off topic).
5. IMHO, Iranian (or Russian/old Soviet) propaganda is inherently unreliable as it often seeks to use a half truth to mask a total lie — as part of a misinformation campaign. Only ‘useful idiots’ or conspiracy theorists would continue to fall for this obvious propaganda ploy when it is right up the Iranian (or Russian/old Soviet) playbook for misinformation, coming from a Russian language source.
- Russia’s Lyudmila Savchuk, first exposed the story of Russia’s disinformation campaign back in 2014. The journalist and 33-year-old mother of two, Savchuk started noticing websites and social media accounts attacking local opposition activists in her hometown of Saint Petersburg with a frequency she hadn’t seen before. In total, Savchuk spent just two and a half months at the Russian run Internet Research Agency or IRA before she went public about the troll factory in a local newspaper. Her conclusion: IRA was a troll farm, run as a Kremlin project, by a shadowy local restaurateur named Evgeny Prigozhin.
- For background, I note the term ‘useful idiots’ has a long history. For Lenin, as founder of the USSR (aka Soviet empire), it wasn't enough merely to have a communist revolution in Russia. He wanted communism to take over the world, and he cultivated a special corps of ‘useful idiots.’ These were seen as ‘foot soldiers’ to push his revolution in every country — co-opting and subverting democratic processes, fomenting strikes, installing secret armies and, above all, propagandizing according to the Kremlin's dictates.
6. Trump’s problem of credibility with the liberal media is well documented. Like Fox News, Trump’s approach is the same since his 2016 election — speaking to his party faithful, scoring political points for partisan political goals and calling out Western main stream media sources as ‘fake news’ (which is very different in scale and scope vs Russian control of the media and its paid army of online trolls) when they disagree with him — a feature of American polarisation in their political divide. But the unlike Russian sources and the docile Russian press, the media in the US still serves as the fourth estate to ‘fact check’ Trump and embarrass him. In contrast no Russian media outlet can afford to offend Putin:
AP NEWS:
A glance at Russian journalists attacked or killed.
7. More importantly, the Western media are able to break the news on the 11 injured servicemen from the missile attack in Iraq; and the Watergate scandal showed the power of the fourth estate in the US. That is the crucial difference.