Well if Turkish airspace was violated, and especially if the Russians retaliate against the Turks for what they claim to be territorial defense, then yes article 5 can definitely be invoked and it most likely would be.I will give you a slight modified scenario. A Russian fighter briefly violates (or not, we are not sure about the first time yet) Turkish airspace again. A Turkish F-16 shoots at it from Turkish airspace. Moskva is watching and retaliates, taking down the F-16, inside Turkey. Is it an attack on Turkish (NATO) soil? Can Turkey invoke art.5?
If the US decided to fly fighters into Russia, and Russia shoots down a US aircraft (as happened many times during the Cold War), would the United States be justified in retaliating when Russia was defending its airspace? Should we just go shoot down some Russian bombers the next time they want to overfly a carrier? No, that would be stupid.
I remember when Russia shot down a South Korean KAL 747 with hundreds of civilian passengers on board for violating the airspace over the Kamchatka Peninsula. The US military doesn't fly converted 747's, especially with passenger windows and at cruising speed and altitude. Should South Korea have retaliated? Would they be justified?
You violate a countries airspace, don't act surprised when the country your flying over delivers on the public threats they made. I guess some red lines do exist.