From first flight to serial production in five years and all flight testing completed in 2-2.5 years eh?
A lot of the systems and subsystems of the early PAK-FA are taken directly from upgraded Flanker variants, including the engines. Also, state trials can last for more then a year, and initial serial production can begin long before state trials end. The Su-34 for example began "serial production" in 2006, but state trials were only completed in September 2011. So beginning state trials may be a PR move, and no more then. What exactly state trials mean is also highly questionable. Especially given that a lot of the current PAK-FAs systems are meant to be replaced or upgraded in the near future, including the engines. And these upgrades would likely necessitate a second round of state trials, for the upgraded variant.From first flight to serial production in five years and all flight testing completed in 2-2.5 years eh?
Hmmm. Something sounds just a little off there...
Why is the MoD ordering so much passenger aircraft for the VVS?All in all that's a lot of passenger aircraft for the military.
Excellent question. The MoD does need a certain number of passenger aircraft for flights inside and between MDs. However the An-140 (replacing the An-24) and the Tu-154M (not the Tu-154B, my mistake) fill those needs quite nicely.Why is the MoD ordering so much passenger aircraft for the VVS?
A better sensor suite, AESA radar, and some LO features seem to be the main points. There is a set of next-gen weapons being developed, but it's likely they will work with both PAK-FA and Su-35S.I really wonder how much an increase in capability and performance the PAK-FA represents over the SU-35S given so much of the former apparently draws on the latter?
In theory yes (mainly the Su-35S and Su-30SM), in practice I doubt it will happen. It's unlikely that Su-24Ms or Su-25s could carry them.Regarding the EW pods being developed for the Su-34, is it possible for other aircraft such as the Su-24/25/30/35 to be equipped with them?
I don't recall comparing it to any program, that seems to be others hang-ups not mine...Whatever you do, pls do not compair the Pak-Fa with other program such as F-22 or F-35.
Cause they are very different in many ways.
No doubt this Pak-Fa program is very challanging for Sukhoi and Russian Aviation industry.
But the whole Pak-Fa program is no where as big and daunting as the above 5th gen programs is/was.
We will see compromises in the T-50, when its ready for serial production. And no doubt they figured out the penalty in making the jet too complex and expensive..
The requirements of VVS has always been slighty pragmatic and their jets have to have a certain robustnes in order to operate within their sphere of climat, infrastructure and other operational challanges.
After all they might have learned something from observation alone(see F-22).
I'm not claiming these dates will hold true.
But pls keep in mind the Pak-Fa program started back in 2002.
Large parts of the program has been done with Su-35(engine, FCS, Avionics etc)
And from the looks of it, they might go IOC with the current 117M engine.
It sounds about right, if you know the aviation history for Russia. Way not make this as cheap and time saving as possible.
The Pak-Fa program is also build upon the Su-35S program, which is a nice reminder of the Russian way of working.
With the current exchange rate, it's about 33 billion dollars, not 300.That's ~300 billion dollars worth of aircraft.
I hope they order more Il-78 tanker mods as opposed to 200+ transports, and can they even afford 30 billion on transport aircraft?Currently they have a 140 billion rouble order for 39 aircraft (giving us an average price of 3.59 bln rbls per aircraft. That means they expect total orders to the tune of 280 aircraft, with only 39 of them going to the MoD as of right now. Granted the use of the Il-76 is incredibly widespread, and if the government decided to replace all Il-76s in service everywhere will all federal structures, it would be a number not far from this. But I think their estimates include export orders.
Whoops. Typo. ~30 billion.With the current exchange rate, it's about 33 billion dollars, not 300.
Theoretically yes. These figures include tanker orders, and the VVS has said before that they intend to get new tankers. But they need more then just replacement for current tankers, they need to increase total numbers of tankers in service. As is they barely have enough to keep Long-Range Aviation flying, never mind the Su-34s, and other frontal aviation planes.I hope they order more Il-78 tanker mods as opposed to 200+ transports, and can they even afford 30 billion on transport aircraft?
Those 60 SU-30 SM, do they also include the 12 for Naval Aviation?Update, the VVS just ordered another 30 Su-30SM aircraft, possibly due to the very slow rates of Su-35S production.
bmpd -
This means there is a total of 60 Su-30SM to be handed over by 2016.
Also 4 Su-30M2.You can exlude those older Su-35 units. Don't think VVS ever recieved Su-30..
Sukhoi may have a few airframes flying around, i'm not sure.
Do not mistake older Su-27UB for Su-30.
The initiall deal was 30 Su-30SM.
Then another 30 was signed.
A total of 60 units. This include Naval Aviation.
64 in active use, possibly a few Su-30s from the 90s, but if there are any they're either in storage, or sitting around at Lipetsk.Those 60 SU-30 SM, do they also include the 12 for Naval Aviation?
So by 2016 there will be 71 SU30 in service? (60 contracted pöus around 11 build between 1995-2001?)