If both the Leo 2 and T-90 deals are in negotiations, then perhaps the Indonesians are looking to see who's more willing to cut and haggle? That way, they play the two sellers off each other?
Anything is still possible. With the Min-Def try to cut as much as possible broker involvement in current procurement practices, the brokers now try to get as much as possible the leverages with the Parliament.
Corruption still a big problem in here, even though there's some progress in corruption eradication in Indonesia but one of the biggest problem are the most corrupt institutions in Indonesia is the
Democratically Elected Parliament
Democracy in Indonesia already show the ugly side effect which is the high cost for election and campaign that a Political Party must prepared. Thus since the Democracy restored in Indonesia, most of Politician and political party spend half of their elected time to find money to pay the
previous election and campaign cost, and spend the other half to find money to prepared for the
next campaign and election cost
.
When Soeharto (our Last Dictator) fell, the new system increased the power of Parliament so the power of Executive (Presidency) will not as big as the time of our two beloved dictator (Soekarno and Soeharto) have. But this being used by the political party in the Parliament to get as much as kick-back for projects approval.
Anyway, with the brokers know that their involvement being cut as much as possible by Mindef who preferred Govt to Govt (G to G) deal and not B to B (Broker to Broker) deal that used to be existed with previous defense procurement deal/projects, they know their last chance for big projects deal lies in the Parliament. In such parliaments can break any attempt for G to G deal, for more profitable B to B deal.
Off Course they will try to hide it with several 'pathetic' reasons, such as (one that now popularly circulated by some Parliaments members), for not to buy 'second hand' or surplus weapons but has to buy brand new one. It's pathetic and groundless, since those surplus ex-Nato weapons still in good shape conditions and not much different with a brand new ones.
That's why many Min-def and Armed Forces brass went out to media, try to gather public support for their effort to get surplus ex-Nato weapons, and try to deflect the Parliament (Brokerage influences) argument that those Surplus ex-Nato weapons is in 'crappy' conditions since it's second hand weapons.
In Short the executives (including Mindef and the Armed Forces) now conduct media campaign and public support gathering to fight Brokers that already have strong backing in Parliament.
What a price of democracy that we have to pay